Anti-strike reforms in last budget bill see Harper
government brought to court by public sector union, The National Post
Not exact matches
The difference with the tariffs that this
government is
bringing in — $ 330 million or more on tariffs and interestingly enough they're taking Sony
to court for hesitating
to pay tariffs that this
government on the other side says doesn't actually exist, but if it doesn't exist how can they be taking them
to court for not paying them?
It should certainly be interesting, if the RECBC does decide
to carry this thru
to the nth degree with this example of
government meddling, when some buyer, (that can't use his licensee Sister) decides it is a draconian measure for the Government of BC to dictate whom said buyer may choose to write his contract to purchase a property in The Province and brings the matter before t
government meddling, when some buyer, (that can't use his licensee Sister) decides it is a draconian measure for the
Government of BC to dictate whom said buyer may choose to write his contract to purchase a property in The Province and brings the matter before t
Government of BC
to dictate whom said buyer may choose
to write his contract
to purchase a property in The Province and
brings the matter before the
courts.
It may do so either by its own prosecutions or by stimulating prosecutions in national
courts,
brought by
governments reluctant
to see their officials and soldiers hauled off
to The Hague for trial.
Four days after a 72 - year - old retired
government worker was
brought to a southern California hospital's emergency ward by his 12 - year - old «companion,» a county welfare worker dropped in on the pair and initiated legal action
to have the child made a dependent of the
court.
In papers submitted by the UK
Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the
Government attempted
to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher
brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the
court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider context.
If a new report truly is a false statement of fact that causes harm
to someone's reputation, and if the news reporter has no actual factual basis for the factual claim, the First Amendment does permit the
courts to impose both civil and criminal liability for the false statements, with civil suits
brought by someone who is harmed and criminal liability enforced by the
government.
In a fresh motion on notice
brought to the
court on wednesday, the
government prayed the
court for an order
to shield the identities of the witnesses and that the record of proceedings not
to be made accessible
to the public.
Jacqui Smith: As the hon. Gentleman knows, there is a period of time during which, quite rightly and reasonably — not least given that the
Government's approach
to the retention of data was upheld in the UK
courts — there is consideration and proposals are
brought forward.
The Federal
Government had on April 30 filled the new 32 amended count charges
to replace the initial 18 count charges
brought against 5 defendants in 2015 before the same
court.
The
court had on Thursday compelled the Federal
Government to produce Dasuki
to answer criminal charges
brought against him.
Socio - Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on President Muhammadu Buhari
to urgently «seek from the International Criminal
Court an arrest warrant to bring Mrs Diezani Alison - Madueke before the court on allegations of corruption against her, which the government should consider as crimes against humanity and serious enough for it to sanction her prosecution before the court.&r
Court an arrest warrant
to bring Mrs Diezani Alison - Madueke before the
court on allegations of corruption against her, which the government should consider as crimes against humanity and serious enough for it to sanction her prosecution before the court.&r
court on allegations of corruption against her, which the
government should consider as crimes against humanity and serious enough for it
to sanction her prosecution before the
court.&r
court.»
The Federal
Government failed on Tuesday to produce former National Security Adviser, Colonel Sambo Dasuki (rtd) before a Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja for trial in relation to corruption charges brought against him by the g
Government failed on Tuesday
to produce former National Security Adviser, Colonel Sambo Dasuki (rtd) before a Federal Capital Territory High
Court in Abuja for trial in relation
to corruption charges
brought against him by the
governmentgovernment.
The fate of former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Dasuki is set
to be decided upon as an Abuja High
Court will on Monday February 8, 2016 rule on whether
to discharge him or not from the criminal charges
brought against him by the Federal
Government.
The committee also warns there is no
government target for how many prisoners who break their curfew are
brought to court, and says assessments of whether someone is eligible for the scheme are often lost when they are transferred between prisons.
A High
Court sitting in Kaduna, Thursday in Kaduna, granted stringent bail conditions
to a former Bureau Chief with Vanguard Newspapers, Mr. Luka Binniyat, who is standing trial over alleged false publication
brought against him by the Kaduna State
government.
An Abuja High
Court has knocked off an operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Michael Adariku who was billed
to testify against the former National Security Adviser Colonel Sambo Dasuki (rtd) in the charges
brought against him by the Federal
government.
*** Says he is not scared of trial The former National Security Adviser, Colonel Mohammed Sambo Dasuki has asked an Abuja High
Court to consolidate the two criminal charges bordering on alleged corruption and breach of trust
brought against him by the Federal
Government in -LSB-...]
The former National Security Adviser, Colonel Mohammed Sambo Dasuki has asked an Abuja High
Court to consolidate the two criminal charges bordering on alleged corruption and breach of trust
brought against him by the Federal
Government in the course of his official duties.
A panel from the Second Judicial Department of the state Supreme
Court's Appellate Division released the opinion Thursday, upholding the challenge
brought by state Sen. Dean Skelos (R - Rockville Centre) against Paterson after the governor appointed Ravitch, a long - time
government adviser,
to the position last month.
The case,
brought by ClientEarth, will now go the UK supreme
court which is likely
to rule that the
government should impose dramatic measures
to finally make our air safe
to breathe.
«I shall in the coming week write
to each and every agency of
government concerned and demand that the regulations be
brought to Parliament within 30 days otherwise I will proceed
to the Supreme
Court to seek an injunction against all that they are doing in violation of the law.»
As the federal
government seeks a place
to shelter children detained at the border as they await appearances in immigration
court, some have been
brought to New York
to be placed in the care of relatives or sponsors here, according
to The New York Times.
«I shall in the coming week write
to each and every agency of
government concerned and demand that the regulations be
brought to Parliament within 30 days otherwise I will proceed
to the Supreme
Court to seek an injunction against all that they are doing in violation of the law,» he said
to Citi News at the time.
«Nigerians are aware that of all the people who have been facing the predicament of having worked for either the PDP or the previous federal
government, our son has been the only one that was
brought to court in handcuffs, paraded as a common criminal and treated without any dignity whatsoever,» the statement read.
In earlier civil and criminal suits
brought by the US
government and the state of Alaska, Exxon settled out of
court and agreed
to pay fines and restitution of nearly $ 1 billion, plus cleanup costs totalling about $ 2.5 billion.
In a case
brought by environmentalists against Tehri Dam, the Supreme
Court of India sided with
government scientists
to dismiss safety concerns.
Ghost Recon: Wildlands» depiction of Bolivia has drawn a Bolivian
government complaint with the country ready
to bring the matter
to the
courts if needed.
India's environment
court has slammed the
government over the capital's horrendous air pollution, which it said was «getting worse» every day, and ordered a string of measures
to bring it down.
«Youth around the country and internationally are
bringing their
governments to court to secure their rights
to a healthy atmosphere and stable climate,» Olson said.
The lawsuit, which is
brought by a collective called Our Children's Trust and is often described as «kids versus climate change,» is built on an appeal
to the equal - protection clause, namely, that in failing
to take action on warming, the
government is violating it by imposing massive costs on future generations; it is scheduled
to be heard this winter in Oregon district
court.
It would be open
to the
Government to ask the House of Lords
to approve the Order,
bring the test into force and take their chances that shortly after its passage the
Court of Appeal takes a different view.
The
Government has said that leaving the European Union will «
bring about an end
to the direct jurisdiction of the
Court of Justice of the European Union.»
On the heels of three cases involving military members injured «off of the battlefield,» the United States Supreme
Court passed the Feres Doctrine in 1950, making these individuals and their families unable
to bring a claim against the federal
government for such.
A number of test cases were
brought in the High
Court to challenge the
Government's position.
Requesting an amicus brief from the Attorney General effectively allows the
court to determine the length and strength of arguments the Federal
Government might
bring.
The
government also argued that Fisher had no grounds
to bring an «illegal exaction» claim because his claim is based on the policies and procedures of the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts.
The recent decision of the Ontario
Court of Appeal in R v Nguyen, 2015 ONCA 278 [Nguyen] on the spousal incompetency rule has now been rendered largely moot as a result of changes
to the Canada Evidence Act [CEA]
brought in by the previous Harper
government.
While emphasizing that it did not approve of the soldier's statements, the
court, in an opinion written by Judge Margaret A. Ryan, ruled that the
government had not shown sufficient grounds
to bring charges against him.
[Unofficial translation: «In cases that are
brought before the
courts, the
courts have the right and duty
to verify whether laws and other decisions made state -
government conflicts with the Constitution.»]
Nadon's dissent in the 2009 Federal
Court of Appeal ruling in Khadr v. Canada, siding with the
government on the issue of
bringing Omar Khadr back
to Canada from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, has left some
to call him a «pro-Guantanamo» judge.
The High
Court has dismissed a legal challenge
brought by NGOs against the UK
government's licensing of arms sales
to Saudi Arabia, which has been involved in military conflict in Yemen since 2015.
a major energy consortium on claims, taxes and penalties
brought by a Kazakhstan
Government agency in the Kazakhstan
courts relating
to production from a large Kazakh oilfield and other contractual and investment treaty arbitration claims
They intended for all matters
brought to the
courts to be considered by a jury of independent, free individuals, who were not beholden
to the
courts or
government, and who would freely render a verdict based on justice even if in direct opposition
to the
courts and the law.
The thing I have been saying for years is this; If, the
government, at any level, refuses payment on account or fails
to exchange the original
court order / bill upon presenting payment then, what case can they
bring forward??
«I conclude that all the claims of Imperial [Tobacco] and the other tobacco companies
brought against the
government of Canada are bound
to fail,» Supreme
Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the long, complex, and unanimous 9 - 0 judgment.
Every state in the US may experience crimes that would be classified as federal crimes which would be
brought up
to the Federal
Court for trial.There are over 100 types of federal crimes which could be filed especially those related
to Federal
government property.
Having been awarded two oil exploration blocks by the DRC's
government in 2006, which were subsequently transferred
to two companies registered in the BVI, Tullow
brought both legal proceedings and a case before Paris» International
Court of Arbitration.the DRC really would be one of the last places you want
to get embroiled in a legal dispute
penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is
brought in the Supreme
Court or the Provincial
Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one
to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any
government body, in relation
to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are
to a) Establish a statutory right
to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals
to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access
to the
courts for all proceedings and claims that are not
brought or maintained for an improper purpose.
The Bar will, of course, adapt
to whatever changes the
government, the
courts, or the market may
bring about.