That sounds good, but
the government gave no more money.
Not exact matches
Given that the
government is currently running a deficit and is $ 20 trillion in debt, scratching up the
money to redeem those bonds would require either higher taxes or
more government borrowing.
Remember, if the
government gives us a tax cut they'll still have to make up the budget shortfall somehow, chiefly by selling
more bonds to American citizens (who happen to be the same people getting the tax cut) or foreigners (who will raise the
money by selling us
more of their goods and services, or buying less of ours).
But I would rather pay the taxes now, and yes that means
giving more money to the
government now, than get taxed on it later in life.
If it does, the U.S.
government will have to pay
more interest on its debt, and that would be difficult,
given all the
money it's been printing.
«She is living in poverty because the B.C. Liberal
government is taking the
money her dad pays to support her, and using it to pay for their misguided priorities, like spending
more than a million dollars hiring failed B.C. Liberal candidates and
giving insiders cushy appointments after the last election.»
However when the
government gives you a break it doesn't matter how much it costs, you just keep spending
more to make
money faster.
Instead of the present system in the United States in which the federal
government collects most of the taxes and then returns
money to the states, the states would have
more power to tax and would
give some of their
money to the national
government.
I would never
give money to a religious organization that doesn't pay taxes — that is like
giving money to my kids — and they need it
more than the church... I think faith is a wonderful thing for a lot of people — including myself (I have faith in myself)-- I just wish others would keep their «faith» personal, and out of politics and
government.
Sow into the right local Church and the right Church / Ministry Organizations where the Holy Spirit leads you to because they are
more resposible with
money then the
government, and above all, God will bless you for your
giving!!!
I'm far
more comfortable
giving money to
government and then voting someone out of office if I don't like what they do with it.
This guy wants to
give more of his
money to charity that actually helps people then to
government that wastes half our
money and takes away our personal liberties.
One might assume that was because the
government,
giving more money to schools, wanted greater control.
We try as hard as we can to
give as much aid as we can, and I'm sure other churches do too, but if everyone put forth even
more effort, religion would once again become a key part of society and the
government would have a little bit
more money to work with.
But a few years ago a court ruled that eminent domain meant the
government could seize private land and
give it / sell it to another private concern who could show they would return
more tax
money.
Peers are to debate plans to
give the Welsh
Government more powers, including the ability to borrow
money and some control over taxes.
«I don't know about you,» Steele writes in the message, «but I don't believe there is anything patriotic about
giving more of your hard - earned
money to the
government to bankroll the liberal Democrats» agenda.»
Andrew Lansley, the health secretary in the coalition
government, recently called for the NHS to be
given # 5bn
more than the
money already planned.
More than half the people outside the
government who met with Clinton while she was secretary of state
gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation.
Hawkins» platform includes a call for a $ 15 hourly minimum wage rate, a ban on hydrofracking, using
government money to hire unemployed workers for public projects, a single - payer healthcare program, rejecting the Common Core teaching standards (and the federal
money that came with them), refiguring school aid to
give more help to poorer districts and raising taxes on the richest New Yorkers.
New York State is already the No. 1 donor state in the nation, meaning we
give the federal
government more money than we get back, and we get back a lower percentage than any other state.
Question topics included financial incentives
given by the City to Altronix (which hosted the Mayor for a visit just before the press conference), whether the mayor has concerns about offering such incentives, whether his jobs task force will work with local communities, whether his affordable housing plan conflicts with his plan to enable
more manufacturing in the city, what a base livable minimum wage is, whether the mayor is concerned about the possibility that Republicans may control the U.S. Senate next year, whether NY State has done enough to assist NYC in obtaining hazard mitigation
money from the federal
government, the Mayor's views on items sold at the September 11th Museum gift shop and what the first «tangible» product of the task force will be.
The debate about whether the federal
government should spend
money on basic research instead of
giving more to applied research is an old one, said Melinda Baldwin, a lecturer in the history of science at Harvard University.
The Federal
Government has said that
more money and resources will be spent to
give food and agriculture a
more prominent place in Australian Primary & Secondary schools.
Given that the
government has already announced an additional # 1.3 bn for the core schools budget between 2018 and 2020 and confirmed that the overall pot will be distributed
more transparently under a new national funding formula, it is unlikely that we will see any new
money being announced.
The
government's pupil premium scheme, which
gives more money to schools for each child on free school meals, should also be
more focused on aiding white working class children, he added.
Government is too big and too bureaucratic, and our goal as members is to promote ideas that rein in government overreach, give more money back to taxpayers and promote stable, growing
Government is too big and too bureaucratic, and our goal as members is to promote ideas that rein in
government overreach, give more money back to taxpayers and promote stable, growing
government overreach,
give more money back to taxpayers and promote stable, growing economies.
But Indiana State Teachers Association president Nate Schnellenberger says he fears
giving charters access to state
money will create
more entities dependent on
government support, meaning the state will shortchange failing public schools serving the same low - income populations.
A collaboration like this makes sense for the CIA,
given the U.S.
government's big «cloud first» initiative, which holds that the use of cloud computing technologies will save
money and make
government more responsive and flexible to its constituencies.
You
give your savings to someone to use (person, bank, business, or
government) and hope they will return your
money plus
more.
Never
give the
government more money that it rightfully is owed.
It seems great, but, really, you're
giving the
government an interest - free loan for most of the year, and you could get
more out of that
money if it was paid directly to you.
The audience member was certain that having enough deductions and exemptions to push your taxable income below $ 0 resulted in the
government «
giving you
more money.»
Therefore, borrowers who are in competition with the federal
government for your
money must pay you
more to
give you an incentive to lend to them instead of Uncle Sam.
That way, you'll avoid
giving the
government too much
money and can use it to cover
more pressing needs.
But after learning about the tax code, I realized I was just
giving up my present income so the
government could have some
more money during the year.
If an asset purchase price is high, they lend
more money to the
government, and
give less stock, in exchange shares in Aggbank.
This also has the benefit of
giving people the chance to make
more money therefore help the economy to recover which mean the
government will increase ss later on.
For example, ever since the 1990's Professor David Mills and Dr Mark Diesnedorf have been making statements like: — solar power is cost competitive with nuclear power now as a baseload generator, if the
government would just
give us some
more money to demonstrate it — wind power is cheaper than nuclear and because the wind is always blowing somewhere wind can provide baseload generation.
Information on payments will
give citizens
more power to track the
money being paid to
governments in resource - rich countries to combat oil and mineral sector corruption.
Global warming may make the world's inhabitants cranky and stressed, drive them crazy,
give them cancer and even worsen their suffering from sexual dysfunction, according to a new
government report on climate change — but the scientists say
more money is needed before they can be certain.
Still considering
giving a billion dollars of taxpayers»
money to Adani to open a new coal mine, pushing for keeping the Liddell coal - fired power station open five years
more than its owner, AGL, intended, and criticising the SA
Government's achievment of 52 % renewable electricity as «idiocy».
The «man - made hysteria» associated with the global - warming fraud is a real threat to mankind in the sense that it a) has the potential to, and in fact is, turning millions of gullible individuals into fanatical, anti-human ideologues, b) diverting precious time,
money and resources that could be
more usefully spent elsewhere into the ridiculous and unscientific attempts by environmental extremists to «control the climate» via enforced — through
government legislation and burdensome taxes — behaviour modification of supposedly free citizens, and c)
giving the practice of science a bad reputation amongst the general populace, which in turn has been a major contributing factor to the general decline in the understanding of basic scientific concepts, and reality in general, that we have been witnessing over the last 40 years or so (ex.
On the other hand, I believe some percentage of climate scientists are opportunists, in it for the
money, who will
give scientific support to almost any exaggeration to get
more government grants.
More money for legal aid, while a good idea, maybe, is unrealistic
given the crushing debt load this
government has heaped upon itself, and us.
Americans wouldn't tolerate the latter, and we shouldn't tolerate the
government using our tax
money to encourage us to
give it even
more of our
money (and freedom), meanwhile drowning out other voices with a tidal wave of statist shilling.»
In addition,
governments have no
more money to
give legal - aid, so any suggestion that legal aid funding must be increased is naïve and steeped in unreality.
It's often
more advantageous to pocket that
money throughout the year instead of
giving it to the
government.
With the Indigenous Advancement Strategy being mired in controversy and
giving money to non-Indigenous sporting organisations and
government departments, crowdfunding is a way of succeeding
more independently than this.
How long will it take taxpayers to teach
government simply to
give us the
money — or let us keep
more of the
money — and we'll decide what to do with it.