Sentences with phrase «government in the second case»

Not exact matches

Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein has been taunting the U.K. government over Twitter in recent weeks about how he's getting ready to spend more time in Frankfurt after Brexit, as well as gently nudging the country to have a second referendum in case it wanted to change its mind.

Europe's second - highest court has rejected a request from the U.S. government to intervene in Apple's challenge against an EU order to pay back taxes of up to 13 billion euros ($ 15.3 billion) because it failed to prove a direct interest in the outcome of the case.

On insider trading, see also «Second Circuit Overturns Newman and Chiasson Convictions, Raising Government's Burden of Proof in Tippee Liability Insider Trading Cases,» The Hedge Fund Law Report, Vol.

This man» a former official of the Second Republic (the previous civilian government, overthrown by the military in 1983) who was once imprisoned by the current regime» told me that in many places in the north, where he often tries cases, Nigerian civil law has become a dead letter: judges regularly turn cases over to the sharia courts even if only one party to the case is a Muslim.

But the case around «elective dictatorship» set out by Lord Halisham in 1976 is rather different if one introduces measures like devolution, an entrenched bill of rights, a legitimate second chamber with revising powers, stronger and legitimate local government.

(Give me benevolent dictator powers, and I might go for an AV / AMS 50 - 50 hybrid rather than AV + or AMS, though I would see straight AV, with PR second chamber and STV in local government as a very good advance in the real world; and think there is a coherent case).

In a classic case of divide and rule, the government recently chose not to slash fees for Crown Court advocacy, while at the same time imposing a second tranche of 8.75 % cuts on solicitors» criminal legal aid fees.

Cuomo, in the second day of attacks on the Collins amendment, said Republican leaders in Congress are trying to «buy votes» in exchange for support on the repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act, and he said if that's the case, then the federal government should «pay for it.»

It's not the only trial in the case, which is so sprawling it's been divided in two: A second trial, over allegations of bid - rigging in government development projects in Buffalo and Syracuse, is slated to begin in June, just before the governor's reelection campaign will start in earnest.

A 13 - page confidential document by Lord Goldsmith of March 7th 2003, released to the public in April 2005, said the government could make a «reasonable case» for invasion without a second UN resolution but said a court «might well conclude» it was in fact illegal.

The Lizzas and their company face among the most serious charges in the case, with husband and wife each charged with 19 felony counts of bribery, 18 felony counts of rewarding official misconduct in the second degree, and two felony counts of defrauding the government in addition to one count each of a misdemeanor conspiracy charge.

Cuomo, in the second day of attacks on the Collins amendment, says Republican leaders in Congress are trying to «buy votes» in exchange for support on the repeal and replacement of Obamacare, and he says if that's the case, then the federal government should «pay for it.»

This is the second court defeat for the UK government on this issue: its clean air plan was drawn up after it lost a long - running case in 2015.

In the second, about games and «The Need for Rockstars», Callaghan says that «The business case is easily made, and has been made repeatedly in the past, but to really capture the eye of government and balance the arguments of established cultural crusaders, we need more than the business case — we need rockstars of our own.&raquIn the second, about games and «The Need for Rockstars», Callaghan says that «The business case is easily made, and has been made repeatedly in the past, but to really capture the eye of government and balance the arguments of established cultural crusaders, we need more than the business case — we need rockstars of our own.&raquin the past, but to really capture the eye of government and balance the arguments of established cultural crusaders, we need more than the business case — we need rockstars of our own.»

We've completed an analytic report that supports that approach in two ways: first, attaching actual projections to Andy Grove's «strategic inflection» idea, and second, in a timely response to the increasing support for a national «cash for clunkers» bill, showing that in many cases, retrofitting may be a better option in terms of energy to spending government funds to crush cars.

In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ of mandamus was rejected in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People.In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ of mandamus was rejected in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People.in favor of the children plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People.in the Juliana case, and in The People.in The People...

The reality is that the summit in Copenhagen and it's attendees are providing a platform, and in some cases actively pushing for a policy enforced by a dictatorship that actively hunts down mothers who become pregnant with their second child, abducts them off the street and takes them to government controlled hospitals where they are drugged and their baby is killed — all in the name of saving the planet.

Once Aboriginal title is declared, as it was in this case, what remains of the Crown's underlying title is two things: first, a fiduciary duty owed to the Aboriginal title holders when the Crown is dealing with the Aboriginal land, and, second, the right to encroach on the Aboriginal title if the government can justify the encroachment (paras 71, 85).

This is why I am going to do a rather detailed summary of the applicants» arguments, of the government's opinion and the court decision first and only comment on the case in the second part of this entry.

In the second week of the new financial year the main story is wins and deals as Clyde & Co selects HighQ Publisher; Brown Rudnick opts for BigHand Create as its document production solution; Marshall, Gerstein & Borun chooses Nikec Binder; LeCorpio's IP management solution is selected by Hyperloop; LawBase's case management system is implemented by three government departments in North America; and business standards company BSI acquires EspioIn the second week of the new financial year the main story is wins and deals as Clyde & Co selects HighQ Publisher; Brown Rudnick opts for BigHand Create as its document production solution; Marshall, Gerstein & Borun chooses Nikec Binder; LeCorpio's IP management solution is selected by Hyperloop; LawBase's case management system is implemented by three government departments in North America; and business standards company BSI acquires Espioin North America; and business standards company BSI acquires Espion.

Second, even if the guidelines are deemed non-severable only in cases with Blakely factors, Martha's lawyers might claim now that her case involves a Blakely factor so she can argue for a lower sentence under the government's non-severability theory.

Second, TMX is not a case in which the Government of Canada seeks to rely solely on the NEB process to discharge its obligations to consult and accommodate.

Over the past year I've written about the Emoluments Clause; the No Religious Tests clause; limits on presidential power as defined in the steel seizure case; the meaning of the oath of office; how the Appropriations Clause constrains lawsuit settlements involving the federal government; how and whether gerrymandering by race and for partisan advantage affects constitutional rights; judicial independence; the decline and fall of the Contracts Clause; the application of Obergefell to issues of public employees and birth certificates; Article V procedure for calling a new constitutional convention; and too many First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment controversies to list.

In the second case, Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, decided May 27, the court removed a legal obstacle for property owners seeking compensation when the value of their land is reduced as a result of government regulation.