However, this method only reduces
government interest costs and can lead to hyperinflation.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance,
cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain
cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the
cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the
cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other
governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of
interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher
interest payments should
interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any
interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other
cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected
costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign
government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Standard and Poor's estimates the federal
government's partial paralysis
cost $ 24 billion, and consultancy IHS Global Insights said on Wednesday that the spike in short - term
interest yields witnessed in the week of Oct. 14 alone will add $ 114 million to the federal debt.
The Federal Reserve could raise short - term
interest rates, investors might charge the
government higher borrowing
costs and a stronger dollar could temper growth through exports, said Mark Doms, a senior economist at the bank Nomura.
These are the moments when
government should act swiftly to craft legislation that could stop abusive behavior in the private sector, especially if legislators are
interested in lowering the
cost of healthcare across the board.
Auditor general Bonnie Lysyk's report noted that the
government now spends more on debt
interest than it does on post-secondary education, and those
interest costs are growing.
A
government that is sovereign in its currency, has no foreign denominated debt and a central bank that can issue its own currency does not have to worry about someone else telling them that they need to raise their
interest costs.
This is because the province has accumulated a large public debt that given the prospects for an economic slowdown and / or rising
interest rates will potentially increase fiscal pressure via debt service
costs which in 2016 - 17 totaled $ 11.7 billion or just over 8 percent of total
government spending.
The amount of debt that is projected under the extended baseline would reduce national saving and income in the long term; increase the
government's
interest costs, putting more pressure on the rest of the budget; limit lawmakers» ability to respond to unforeseen events; and increase the likelihood of a fiscal crisis, an occurrence in which investors become unwilling to finance a
government's borrowing unless they are compensated with very high
interest rates.
At that point, assuming the bridge that lasts 50 years, the
government would charge the federal budget $ 100 million a year for 50 years, along with the annual
interest costs associated with the borrowing.
Once the federal
government achieved a balanced budget, that
interest rate risk premium quickly disappeared and all levels of
government benefited through lower borrowing
costs.
Unhedged foreign currency debt, as was prominent in 1997, means that a fall in the currency pushes up debt servicing
costs for the
government, local corporates and banks, but a rise in
interest rates to assist the exchange rate has the same adverse effect.
The congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that the mortgage
interest deduction will
cost the federal
government almost $ 80 billion in lost revenue in fiscal year 2016.
Consumer staples industries can be significantly affected by competitive pricing particularly with respect to the growth of low -
cost emerging market production,
government regulation, the performance of overall economy,
interest rates, and consumer confidence.
Governments in Canada maintain monopolies in certain sectors of the economy through regulations that advance private
interests at an unreasonable
cost to consumers, according to a report from the...
So what Singapore is doing, which I think is so
interesting and is a reminder that there are much more radical fusions of left wing and right wing ideas than people give credit for, is the
government is overwhelmingly regulating both supply and prices to keep
costs down.
Since U.S.
government debt is not long - term in nature, higher refinancing
costs are extremely vulnerable to rising
interest rates.
a municipal bond that is secured by an escrow fund; the escrow fund comes from the issuer floating a second bond issue and using the proceeds from that second bond issue to purchase
government obligations, typically U.S. Treasuries, proceeds from the second bond issue create an escrow fund to mature at the first call date of the first bond issue to pre-refund that issue; bond issuers will typically do this during times of lower
interest rates to lower their
interest costs
Fifth,
governments, industry and other
interested groups should strengthen their efforts to build a national ethic of energy conservation and a clearer public understanding of the
costs and benefits of various energy choices.
Other major tax expenditures include lower rates on income from capital gains, exemptions for retirement contributions, and the beloved mortgage
interest deduction, which
costs the
government nearly $ 64 billion a year.
It's called Tracking the Energy Revolution, and its 18 pages of maps, charts, and graphics tell the story of how plunging equipment
costs, strong investor
interest, and
government and business leadership are driving a global shift to renewable energy sources such as wind, sun, and water.
On its Web site, the VA warns consumers that just because VA mortgages are
government - backed doesn't mean the
government sets their
interest rates or
costs.
At the end of World War II, the Treasury pressured the Fed to keep
interest rates artificially low to minimize the
government's
interest costs on its ballooning debt.
For example, the
cost for the Indonesian
government to borrow money for a decade rose more than half a percentage point, to 4.8 percent; similarly eye - popping
interest rate increases occurred in countries including Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, Russia, and Poland.
The former is meant for those with demonstrated financial need, and the
government pays the
interest costs that would otherwise accrue while such borrowers are in school, and during their six - month grace period following graduation.
To me, it is
interesting to look at the model that's often held up as being remarkably successful since the end of WWII which is the mercantilist model that Japan followed which was to protect domestic industries at all
costs and then use
government money and power to boost your export sector.
If you are still able to lower your
interest rate, your total repayment
costs won't increase as much as they would if you stretched out your payments in a
government repayment plan.
Thanks to the
interest rate reduction, repayment
costs are in the same range as the
government's 10 - year graduated plan.
It is caused chiefly by kleptocratic
governments or private
interests in league with
governments that make market exchange unprofitable, that make investment in producing something to exchange silly, that encourage achieving private wealth at the
cost of other people's wealth instead of by working, saving and inventing (economists know this last by the odd term «rent seeking»).
The
government may be dysfunctional in some ways, but the marketplace is sociopathic,
interested only in profit at all
costs.
On top of rent supplements, each privately owned apartment
costs the
government from $ 4,000 to 6,000 per year in tax benefits and
interest subsidies.
«In addition, a sensible
interest rate should be introduced on student loans, set at the current
government cost of borrowing, to rectify the huge subsidy that the
government currently pays.»
«Let loose in
government on their own they would wreck the recovery —
costing jobs, driving up
interest rates and undermining the growth needed to cut tax bills and fund public services,» he will say.
But the
government also needs to support Britain's future energy needs through investment, rather than leaving it all to the energy companies which then pass the
cost of investment on to consumers with
interest.»
Ghana earns five percent of royalties, a carried
interest of 10 percent, an additional or paying
interest of 3.75 percent and, petroleum income tax of 35 percent, while additional oil entitlement and also comes to the
government, with the law allowing the International Oil Companies (IOCs) full
cost recovery.
A new study from the Campaign Finance Institute by Professor Michael Malbin concludes that the
cost of running a public financing system in New York State would be roughly $ 40 million, which works out to $ 2 per New Yorker — not a bad trade considering the millions more the state
government wastes in handouts to special
interests.
Few people talk about the
cost to the economy of these steps - and the party whose job it is to oppose the
government doesn't seem very
interested in doing so.
Cuomo may also be
interested in making some modifications to the freeze proposal, which is designed to push local
governments into capping property tax increases and then find
cost savings through shared services.
«I would bring local control back to town
government, take advantage of our local resources, especially our water system, fight for the taxpayer at every level, especially state and federal, and get water and sewer projects back on track to be in the best
interests of the town, not just a
cost burden directed by others.»
Warning that current Prime Minister Theresa May could be using the vote to attempt to win herself a «mandate for Brexit Means Brexit aka Brexit At Any
Cost», he urged voters consider whether their chosen candidates would be «prepared to hold the
Government properly to account in the
interests of the country».
Davis advocated for sharing other city and county services to eliminate redundant
costs, but said merging
governments was not in the best
interest of the city.
Before it improves the business climate in New York, the Cuomo administration needs businesses to pony up $ 21.25 per employee to cover the
cost of a $ 95 million
interest payment it owes the federal
government for its unemployment insurance program.
The National Association of Probation Officers (Napo) believes it is
costing # 5 million and that the
government will repay the investors with a significant amount of
interest if reoffending rates are reduced by at least seven per cent against the predicted score.
The Committee explained that GHc1.8 billion has been earmarked for
interest payments whilst grants to other
government units will
cost GHc 2.3 billion.
Do we want to send a message worldwide that any
government will take down the projects of national
interest as per their sweet will, in total disregard of the welfare of the people and without considering the
costs that this nation would face?
He said that the council approved the procurement of 50 units of tractors at the
cost N13.9 million per tractor, noting that
interested farmers will pay 40 per cent of the unit price of the tractor before collection and
government will pay 60 per cent subsidy per tractor.
These types of bonds significantly reduced the County's
cost of borrowing because of the high
interest subsidies provided by the federal
government.
The release further stated that «
government is satisfied that it is no longer in the public
interest to keep running these agencies, parastatals and departments with huge
cost on public revenue and no services to the public, under the present economic realities».
Meanwhile, the elimination or limits on federal tax exemptions for municipal bonds has received less attention, but could have
cost local
governments $ 45 billion in higher
interests costs if it had not been in place.
Cuomo has been studiously working to lock down the support of private sector unions while eschewing the public sector organizations that seem to be included when he discussions the amorphous «special
interests» that hold too much away over Albany and are driving the
cost of
government ever upwards.