Yet despite huge delays on projects for the Child Support Agency and the MoD, and even having to pay compensation to
the government over their tax credits system, the company founded in 1962 by eccentric Texan (and 1990s presidential candidate) Ross Perot remains the UK government's largest IT contractor.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in
tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
tax law, such as the effect of The
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our
credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other
governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our
credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving
credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign
government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Statistics Canada reports that spending on home repairs and maintenance increased 22 % in 2009
over the previous year, «likely due to the federal
government home renovation
tax credit program.»
The
credit has been extended 16 times since 1981, but it would cost the federal
government more than $ 22 billion
over the next 10 years, and it is the most expensive of the
tax provisions being considered for renewal, says Rosenberg.
With regard to the challenge of improving Canada's long - term productivity growth, the
government's response was to reduce the
tax benefit of the Scientific Research and Experimental Tax credit and to reallocate the savings of only about $ 1 billion over five years to a number of small government programs, for which no details were provid
tax benefit of the Scientific Research and Experimental
Tax credit and to reallocate the savings of only about $ 1 billion over five years to a number of small government programs, for which no details were provid
Tax credit and to reallocate the savings of only about $ 1 billion
over five years to a number of small
government programs, for which no details were provided.
Tax credits also have a history of growing out of control — and means
governments are continuously making the kinds of adjustments that could give them sway
over the news industry.
Over at the Wall Street Journal, Kimberly Strassel compared an expanded child
credit that could be applied to a parent's payroll
tax liability to
government subsidies to Solyndra.
Only by writing off # 3.5 billion of
tax credit debts, which HM Revenue and Customs has declared «uncollectable», has it succeeded in reducing the total amount of debt owed to the
government over the last # 5.5 billion.
«Successive
governments deserve
credit for the improvements they have made to pre-legislative consultation on
tax matters
over recent years.
Following the spat between the
government and the House of Lords
over tax credits, Lord Strathclyde was asked to review the relationships between the two Houses of Parliament.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been arguing that the draft clauses do not provide «a general power to create new benefits in devolved areas as was promised by the Smith Commission and gives the UK
government effective veto
over changes to universal
credit, including bedroom
tax.»
There's been scandal - the suspension of MP Michelle Thomson
over allegations about property deals, the award of a # 150,000
government grant to the organisers of the profitable T in the Park music festival after a meeting brokered by a former SNP adviser - and there's been political ineptitude, most notably when the nationalists were put on the back foot by a Labour pledge to use Holyrood's powers to overturn
tax credit cuts.
5) Corbyn claims a number of policy victories as his own, including the
government's defeats
over tax credits and proposed disability cuts.
But his version of property
tax relief - tying local
government consolidation to individual homeowners»
tax credits - hasn't won
over some state lawmakers and local
government officials throughout the state.
Rolling coverage of all the day's political developments as they happen, including reaction to last night's double
government defeat in the Lords
over tax credits
Despite the upturn in growth that is now finally forecast
government figures published alongside last month's Autumn Statement show: - spending on Housing Benefit for people in work set to rise by
over # 1bn
over the next three years; - and downgraded projections for wage growth between 2015 and 2018 adding # 500m to the
tax credit bill.
That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the
Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the
Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal
credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults
over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting
tax relief on pension contributions for people earning
over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income
tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning
over a million pounds per year receiving an average
tax cut of
over # 100,000 a year.
The
Government is currently in conflict with the House of Lords
over reform of
Tax Credits, with at one point the possibility of a Lords «shutdown» being inflicted by the
Government.
Following the House of Lords» refusal to allow the
government to enact secondary legislation during the row
over tax credits cuts last year, the
government set up the Strathclyde Review, which suggested reforms which could alter the balance between the
government and the two houses of parliament.
Public anger
over cuts to
tax credits, disability benefits, and changes to national insurance contributions for self - employed workers have driven the most significant
government welfare policy U-turns in recent years.
Meanwhile in Washington, the federal
government's version of the historic
tax credit will now be spread
over five years, as the result of recently passed
tax code reform.
Among Freeman's specific recommendations are a «20 percent federal
tax credit to electricity and natural gas utilities that gives highest priority to the efficient use of the energy they supply,» and ban on new coal or nuclear plants and retirement of the existing plants within the next 30 years,
government - funded demonstration plants for Big Solar and hydrogen, increasing federal fuel economy standards one mile - per - gallon a year
over the next 24 years,
tax credits for plug - in hybrids or flex - fuel vehicles, and an excess - profits
tax on oil to fund the
tax credits.
Guide to SWOT Analysis Dream Builder: the Women's Business Center
GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS: Medicare add - on
tax for income
over $ 200,000, Affordable Health Care
tax credit (< 25 employees) 1095C — Health Coverage...
If you have no cap, you could, in theory, preside
over the greatest federalization of education finance in the history of the United States, because the federal
government would be the one taking in less revenue as a result of offering these
tax credits.
Over 18 million taxpayers are projected to receive the Earned Income
Tax Credit (EITC) in tax year 1997, at a total cost to the federal government of about 25 billion dolla
Tax Credit (EITC) in
tax year 1997, at a total cost to the federal government of about 25 billion dolla
tax year 1997, at a total cost to the federal
government of about 25 billion dollars.
Over time,
tax credits are becoming the bipartisan «third way» on school choice, and citizens increasingly are calling for more options and accountability to them rather than
government bureaucrats.
The Federal
Government estimates $ 430 million will be handed out to families
over the next five fiscal years through the Children's Arts
Tax Credit.
(PhysOrg.com)-- Solar power manufacturers in the US are cutting prices to shift their stock, the
government is chipping in with
tax credits, and innovative leasing or financing arrangements spreading payments
over up to...
Over the next five years, the Indian
government is planning to spend $ 475 billion in energy investments, with $ 120 billion to $ 130 billion intended for
tax credits, but it could be difficult to promote geothermal energy.
It is, as the briefing notes affirm, a reference to the
Government's desire — following the row
over the House of Lords» refusal to approve secondary legislation on
tax credits last year — to limit the Lords» role in this sphere.
If you go
over that cap, you've lost eligibility for the Premium
Tax Credit and will have to pay the full credit back to the gover
Credit and will have to pay the full
credit back to the gover
credit back to the
government.
The combination of a
government tax credit for first - time buyers and historically low mortgage rates contributed to increased demand for residential housing
over 2009.
«With
over half a million Canadians potentially affected, I think it's time for the
government to step in and make this right with a
tax credit for those forced to pay for repairs.»
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate the repeal of the individual mandate will result in
over ten million additional uninsured individuals by 2027 and save the
government over $ 300 billion
over a ten - year period, as fewer people are insured and no longer qualify for the ACA's premium
tax credits.