Sentences with phrase «government purpose rights»

Currently representing Aerospace and Defense company in a Contract Dispute before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals defending the company's claims of commercial and government purpose rights licenses in technical data and software related to aircraft purchased by the United States Air Force.

Not exact matches

The purpose of instituting governments, as the American framers noted, was not to enumerate human rights but «to secure these rights.»

The purpose of community, the purpose of our government, the purpose of our leaders should be to call us to pursue common values and common good, not simply in the moment of extreme crisis but every day in our lives, starting right now, today.»

At the very least, we must ensure the civil rights of children who may someday come into the world through cloning, by insisting that no child can be owned, bought, sold, or manipulated, that no government agency or group can sponsor the cloning of a child over which it will have guardianship (i.e., children will be cloned only in circumstances where they will be reared by a family), and that no child can be cloned solely for the purpose of procuring organs or for monetary gain.

In one sense the discovery of human individuality was necessary for the development of human rights, the economic individualism orientated to profit and free market produced the modern economy; the separation of human being from nature coupled with the autonomy of the world of science helped the development of technology; and the autonomy of different areas of life like the arts and the government, each to follow purposes and laws inherent in it, did make for unfettered creativity in the various fields.

More importantly, where does that statement imply we have a right to own weapons for the purpose of overthrowing the federal government, as widely believed by the N.R.A. and the numerous «militias» you can find here in Texas?

Today, concretely, it means that transnational corporations can invest freely where they will and for what purposes they will and that governments give up the right to regulate them.

The Act effectively gives the British government the right to «de-recognize» an embassy, and therefore dispense with the principle of inviolability, if it believes that premises are being misused for non-diplomatic purposes that undermine public safety or national security.

I forgive you for being so misinformed, it can be tough to see past stereotypes and oversimplifications perpetuated by a news media that knows very little about the true nature of the Bill of Rights and the purpose and intent of government as envisioned at the dawning of this great Republic.

«The Government not only needs to ensure that it is able to demonstrate that its funding reform proposals are fit for purpose, but it also needs to secure confidence from schools, teachers and the public that these are the right proposals in the circumstances.

David also worked on successful property rights legislation that ensured property owners got to see land appraisals possessed by the condemner and an opportunity to reclaim their propriety if is not used for the government's originally stated purpose.

The federal government long ago purchased easements — the right to flood the land — from the farmers who own it, precisely for this purpose.

It is interesting to note that Federal law was specifically altered in 1984 to strike reference to patent agreements between fellows and government funding agencies (35 USCS 212): «No scholarship, fellowship, training grant, or other funding agreement made by a Federal agency primarily to an awardee for educational purposes will contain any provision giving the Federal agency any rights to inventions made by the awardee.»

In Revenue Ruling 57 - 127, the IRS Commissioner determined that funds from a government foundation used by an individual for the purpose of conducting a research project free from direction and control of the institution were not to be considered a fellowship because the foundation reserved rights in patents resulting from the research, thereby establishing a quid pro quo.

In order to realise its goal of ramping up Canada's innovation capacity, the government must inject more resources into areas such as technology commercialization for the purpose of doing the job right.

There may be instances when we may disclose your information without providing you with a choice in order to protect the legal rights of Tubi or its affiliates, and each of their respective investors, directors, officers, employees, agents, and suppliers; to protect the safety and security of users of the Tubi Services or to enforce our Terms of Use; to protect against fraud or for risk management purposes; or to comply with or respond to the law or legal process or a request for cooperation by a government entity, whether or not legally required.

The overall purpose is to help young people gain better knowledge and understanding of their rights as EU citizens and to: enable young people to engage with an issue which will be foremost in the news for at least the next twelve months, and possibly longer; understand the choices facing the UK government, other EU governments and the EU institutions, on this issue; think critically about the issue of citizens» rights in the context of Brexit, coming to their own opinion about the best way forward, and gaining a better understanding of the impact upon themselves and their communities.

The websites are not up to the internet companies, instead publishers and rights holders have to make a case to the Federal government and demand sites whose «primary purpose» is the illegal sharing of copyrighted material be blocked.

Tags: agency, animal control, animal rights, animal welfare, animals, change, control, controlling, county, department, dog catcher, dog dragged, dog warden, dogs, duties, enforcement, government, hesperia, homeless, local, los angeles, mission, name, name change, office, pets, police, proposal, purpose, regulation, rescues, shelters, slapped, videos Comments: 2

When Santa Barbara Island became part of the Channel Islands National Monument in 1938, two parcels of land and right of entry were retained for by the government for lighthouse purposes.

Punksta is right — institutions (like government, the military, universities, etc) will always act in their own perceived interest first, and for their ostensible purpose after.

This time, the all - purpose right - wing rejoinder to any and all claims on the public purse, from single - payer health - care to decent public education to government - financed R&D to international climate - transition assistance to well - run national parks — «We're broke» — seems a whole hell of a lot less unassailable than it did just a few months ago.

Finally, it's important that communities have the right to compensation should the government choose to use their forests for other purposes.

[18] Governments can infringe Aboriginal rights conferred by Aboriginal title but only where they can justify the infringements on the basis of a compelling and substantial purpose and establish that they are consistent with the Crown's fiduciary duty to the group.

Its purpose is «to raise awareness about people's right to access government information while promoting freedom of information as essential to both democracy and good governance.»

And the thought that government authorities can be trusted to use that backdoor only for the «right» purposes, and to keep the backdoor out of the hands of others is wishful thinking.

The Supreme Court unanimously held the requirement in the Local Government Pension Scheme (Benefits, Membership and Contributions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2009 that unmarried co-habiting partners must be nominated in order to be eligible for a survivor's pension, was interference with the appellant's right to property under article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR that could not be «objectively justified» for the purposes of art 14.

penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.

In his opinion, s 4 may have two purposes: to draw the attention of Parliament, the government etc, to an inconsistency between a domestic law provision and a right arising under domestic law by virtue of the incorporation of Convention rights in HRA 1998; to draw the attention of the same constituencies to an inconsistency between domestic law and the UK's international law obligations which arise by virtue of being a signatory of the Convention.

The government's evidence of its purpose in creating the DCO designation (there are 42 countries in that class) was to «deter abuse of [Canada's] refugee system by people who come from countries generally considered safe and «non-refugee producing,» while preserving the right of every eligible refugee claimant to have a fair hearing before the IRB.»

Its express purpose is to «ensure that corporations engaged in mining, oil or gas activities and receiving support from the Government of Canada act in a manner consistent with international environmental best practices and with Canada's commitments to international human rights standards».

This violates the test laid out by the Supreme Court in the Firearms Reference: «if the effects of the law, considered with its purpose, go so far as to establish that it is mainly a law in relation to property and civil rights, then the law is ultra vires the federal government».

Her Majesty further agrees with her said Indians that they, the said Indians, shall have right to pursue their avocations of hunting and fishing throughout the tract surrendered and hereinbefore described, subject to such regulations as may from time to time be made by her Government of Her Dominion of Canada, and saving and excepting such tracts as may from time to time be required or taken up for settlement, mining, lumbering or other purposes, by her said Government of the Dominion of Canada, or by any of the subjects thereof duly authorized therefore by the said Government.31

In other words, the LCAC exists solely for the purpose of inducing governments in Canada to fulfill their lawful obligations as set out in the ratifying legislation and to honour the undertakings they have made pursuant to the affirmation and recognition of these rights in s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

The policy purpose of this rule is to allow «people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects» from government intrusions allowing them privacy, comfort and security as a basic human right.

Their effect, at the very least, and arguably even their purpose, is to prevent people from vindicating their legal rights whenever this vindication requires more time in court than a litigant can afford, which is contrary to the Rule of Law requirement that our relationships the government (and, to some considerable extent, with each other!)

The ruling prohibits government from enacting laws or imposing a labour - relations process «that substantially interferes with the right of employees to associate for the purpose of meaningfully pursuing collective workplace goals.»

# a new Securities Transfer Act will be enacted to provide a modern framework for the transfer of shares, bonds and other securities, and promote interprovincial and international harmonization of rules; # personal health information access and privacy legislation will be introduced to balance the individual's right to confidentiality with the need to get information for legitimate health purposes; # government will receive the report of the Task Force on Access to Family Justice, and respond to its recommendations accordingly; # a Building Code Act will be enacted that establishes a chief building inspector position, promotes consumer safety, and provides for province wide adoption of the National Building Code and mandatory inspections by qualified inspectors; # a Heritage Conservation Act will be introduced to improve heritage stewardship; # a new Pay Equity Act will be introduced to ensure that pay equity legislation applies to all parts of the public service.

The government must have a justifiable purpose and its means used to limit the Charter right must be proportional.

However, the Griffiths case makes it clear that the Northern Territory Government can acquire native title rights and interests for any purpose whatsoever, including for the private benefit of a third party.

In relation to the first point, the government's representative emphasised to the CERD Committee when he appeared before it in March 1999 that the government's purpose in enacting the validation, confirmation and primary production upgrade provisions as well as the amendments to the right to negotiate provisions was legitimate in that it sought to balance a range of interests affected by the legislation using proportionate means to do so.

The High Court in Griffiths, the third case, found that native title rights and interests can be compulsorily acquired for the benefit of private business, thus providing confirmation that the Northern Territory Government can acquire native title rights and interests for any purposes whatsoever, including for the private benefit of a third party.

The Australian Government support and resource the Australian Human Rights Commission to undertake, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, government and other stakeholders, a process to identify options for leveraging Indigenous property rights for economic developmentGovernment support and resource the Australian Human Rights Commission to undertake, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, government and other stakeholders, a process to identify options for leveraging Indigenous property rights for economic development purRights Commission to undertake, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, government and other stakeholders, a process to identify options for leveraging Indigenous property rights for economic developmentgovernment and other stakeholders, a process to identify options for leveraging Indigenous property rights for economic development purrights for economic development purposes.

I begin this Chapter with a reflection on the previous Government's approach to land rights and native title, including its 1998 amendments to the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)(Native Title Act); the 2006 amendments to the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth)(ALRA) and the 2007 compulsory acquisition of lands for the purposes of the Northern Territory Emergency Resrights and native title, including its 1998 amendments to the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)(Native Title Act); the 2006 amendments to the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth)(ALRA) and the 2007 compulsory acquisition of lands for the purposes of the Northern Territory Emergency ResRights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth)(ALRA) and the 2007 compulsory acquisition of lands for the purposes of the Northern Territory Emergency Response.

The Commission further recommends that the Government explore options, in consultation with state and territory governments, Indigenous groups and other interested persons, to enable native title holders to exercise their native title rights for a commercial purpose.

That the Government explore options, in consultation with state and territory governments, Indigenous groups and other interested persons, to enable native title holders to exercise native title rights for a commercial purpose.

The purpose of this section is to discuss the human rights implications of particular findings of extinguishment and some of the emerging implications for the administration of native title by agencies and governments following Miriuwung Gajerrong.

The preamble provides that governments have an obligation «(where appropriate) to facilitate negotiation on Indigenous economic land use».33 A grant of the native title right to fish for commercial purposes would allow traditional owner groups to use their land and waters for economic purposes and fulfil the objectives of the Native Title Act.

During 1998 and 1999 the Government amended the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld) and enacted the Land and Resources Tribunal Act 1999 (Qld) for the purpose of establishing alternative provisions [92] to the right to negotiate under the NTA (the «alternative provisions»).

While each budget paper on Indigenous policy notes the «record amount» that is allocated to Indigenous - specific programs and generally highlights the commitment of the Government to ensuring improved access to programs and services, at no stage do they specifically identify the reduction of the disparities in enjoyment of rights between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people as the purpose of the expenditure.