That would mean they need to give over $ 4,000 through
government wealth transfer to be higher than average.
Sauvé says a lot of the shift is due to
government wealth transfers.
Not exact matches
This may involve using privatization proceeds to pay down debt, higher corporate taxes, and even higher income taxes if other forms of
wealth transfer are robust enough to support them, but one way or another total
government debt must be reduced, or at least its growth must be contained to les than real GDP growth.
But closing down unnecessary capacity can pay for itself, even if unemployed workers are temporarily put on the
government payroll (causing debt to rise, but usually by less than it had before), but only temporarily as Beijing takes other measures to boost household income through
wealth transfers from the state and so to boost consumption, a form of demand which is likely to be more labor intensive than the demand created in the process of over-capacity.
According to this model, a small amount of deceleration in credit growth can occur as additional credit efficiency is squeezed out of the system, but without a sharp decline in GDP growth, substantial and sustainable credit growth deceleration can not occur except after a major transformation of China's growth model, one condition of which is net
wealth transfers from local
governments to median households of at least one to two percentage points of GDP annually.
Most people in BC don't realize that the BC
Government introduced the PTT (property
transfer tax) in 1987 as a
wealth tax.
Wealth is being
transferred from some of the most vulnerable in society to the
government.
Howard Gardner covers a great deal of territory in this interview, from the role of the federal
government in education to teacher education to charter schools, but what stands out most to me is his statement: ``... education in the arts needs no justification in terms of «
transfer» to other subjects or to its generation of
wealth; it is a «good» in itself.»
Such a shift in tax policy would help to redress the massive
transfer of
wealth from ordinary people to the
government that has taken place over the past two decades.
The associated and unnecessary capital gains taxes are just a
wealth transfer from individuals to the
government.
The
government exempts all
transfers of
wealth between a husband and wife from federal estate and gift taxes, regardless of the size of the estate.
Good point — the
government is definitely not an efficient
transfer of
wealth.
Negative interest rate policy, or NIRP, is the most recently deployed weapon of central bankers in their long campaign of financial repression — a deliberate policy of depressing interest rates in order to
transfer wealth from savers (private citizens) to debtors (largely
governments).
His motives about one world
government and massive
transfers of
wealth and power from the west through the UN and various NGO's to the victims of greedy capitalists are well documented.
Y2K wasted some money by companies and
government and generated some temporary jobs... Climate Change requires a huge
transfer of
wealth from some nations to 3rd world countries run by dictators and pushed re-newable energy ahead of prime time and created very few jobs.
This senseless name calling of the scientists on both sides of the political fence, and infighting over the details of the amount of the sensitivity of the climate will soon come to an end, as the experiment on the Earth is continued with out any possible controls by the IPCC policy makers, who only want it to proceed as is, with ADDITIONAL FUNDS taken from taxes paid by the developed world, to hasten to
transfer of
wealth to the third world, while weakening the Western
government systems through self imposed bankruptcy.
These forms of
wealth transfers benefit the
government immediately and have a delayed effect on the people.
If it's not truly as serious a problem as some would have us believe, then we don't need to radically restructure the global economy, expand
government at the expense of freedom, or
transfer more
wealth to other countries.
In no particular order, there are the Leftist economists for whom global warming represents a supreme example of market failure (as well as a wonderful opportunity to suggest correctives), UN apparatchiks for whom global warming is the route to global governance, Third world dictators who see guilt over global warming as providing a convenient claim on aid (ie, the
transfer of
wealth from the poor in rich countries to the wealthy in poor countries), Environmental activists who love any issue that has the capacity to frighten the gullible into making hefty contributions to their numerous NGOs, Crony capitalists who see the immense sums being made available for «sustainable» energy,
Government regulators for whom the control of a natural product of breathing is a dream come true, Newly minted billionaires who find the issue of «saving the planet» appropriately suitable to their grandiose pretensions, Politicians who can fasten on to CAGW as a signature issue where they can act as demagogues without fear of contradiction from reality or complaint from the purported beneficiaries of their actions.
The ASR says Realtors are relieved the
government chose to avoid a new tax on land
transfers, «because taxes on assets destroy
wealth, and property remains the largest single asset for most Saskatchewan families».