filed by local
governments against the fossil fuel industry seeking compensation to help pay for the costs of dealing with local climate impacts.
Not exact matches
Fund managers are worried that some oil fields could become worthless as
governments try to reduce
fossil -
fuel consumption to fight
against climate change.
Without that, all he's got to sustain his opposition to
government intervention
against fossil fuels is the argument from consequences.
Each year,
governments and firms estimate and report CO2 emissions from the burning of
fossil fuels, and their efforts to slow climate change are measured
against these annual emissions.
[v] CCA should recommend the
government ban new
fossil -
fuelled electricity generators to guard
against this risk.
In the opinion of the Danish
government this is a reasonable insurance policy
against unexpected increases in
fossil fuel costs and a solid investment in Denmark's future energy security.
«Following the storms, a coalition of environmental NGO's brings a class - action sit
against the U.S.
government and
fossil -
fuel companies on the grounds of neglecting what scientists (including their own) have been saying for years: that something must be done,» the scenario states.
And he says that the problems caused by burning
fossil fuels are so serious that
governments might have to implement rationing
against the will of the people.
This has not prevented advocates from pursuing their campaigns
against the use of
fossil fuel, nuclear, and hydro power at all levels of American
government.
Others challenge
government authorizations of
fossil fuel development, such as a claim
against the Norwegian
government's approval of oil drilling and a South African NGO's recent successful challenge to the approval of a coal - fired power station.
A quarter of the world's oil refineries risk closure by 2035 if
governments meet targets to limit
fossil fuel burning in the fight
against global warming, a report released on Thursday said.
Closer to home, a lawsuit filed by 21 youth plaintiffs (including Kelsey Juliana) and world - renowned climate scientist James Hansen on behalf of future generations
against the U.S.
government cleared an important hurdle in November 2016 when federal judge Ann Aiken rejected the
government and
fossil fuel industries» motion to dismiss the case.
Today's UCG decision is the first time the Scottish
Government has said no to more
fossil fuel extraction and marks a hugely important turning point in the fight
against climate change.
In the days following Obama's State of the Union address, Stephen Chu took center stage in the energy arena to announce a «Sun shot» — a
government - funded effort to innovate the technology necessary to make solar power competitive
against fossil fuels.
Libertarian organizatons sponsored by the
fossil fuel interests crusade
against «big
government,» but people don't seem to realize that when we have a weak
government and lax regulations it means we are being ruled by politicians funded by big business.
That incentive alignment may not be the case for a
government - funded climate researcher whose career benefits from promulgating the shared political program of heavy intervention
against fossil fuels and would be very much hurt by not going along with that.
Such action would take the form of «climate accountability letters» sent by the local
governments, demanding
fossil companies to take responsibility for the harm their product are causing, but we are also asking the local
governments to consider bringing a class action lawsuit — a joint lawsuit on behalf of all BC local
governments —
against some of the world's largest
fossil fuel cartels.