This year, the District of Columbia and Mississippi had fourth -
grade score gains in mathematics, but the rest of Duncan's superstars had mathematics scores that dropped or were flat.
Not exact matches
Extensive research on the relationship between cognitive achievement (IQ
scores,
grades in school) and breastfeeding has shown the greatest
gains for those children breastfed the longest.
The FCAT writing exam, whose
scores range from 0 to 6, also shows larger
gains for schools earning an F
grade in 1999.
Finally, while exam - school students have considerably higher fluid cognitive skills (as would be expected of students who
gain admission via test
scores and
grades), attending one of these locally renowned schools in the company of other bright students confers no systematic advantage.
A compelling way to see this is to look at the relationship across schools between the average test -
score gain students make between the 4th and 8th
grade and our summary measure of their students» fluid cognitive ability at the end of that period (see Figure 2).
In 1998, Florida
scored about one
grade level below the national average on the 4th -
grade NAEP reading test, but it was
scoring above that average by 2003, and made further
gains in subsequent years (see Figure 1).
I first analyze changes over time in the FCAT test
scores of students in their initial 3rd -
grade year in order to discern the extent to which Florida's elementary - school students made true achievement
gains during the period in question.
To identify the policy's average impact, we compared the
gains in developmental - scale
scores made by students who first entered 3rd
grade in 2002 and
scored below the FCAT benchmark with
gains made by students who first entered 3rd
grade in 2001 and
scored below the FCAT benchmark.
We measure FCAT performance using developmental - scale
scores, which allow us to compare the test -
score gains of all the students in our study, even though they took tests designed for different
grade levels.
I find that the
gains among initial 3rd graders were not as dramatic as those shown on the 4th -
grade NAEP, thereby suggesting that the 4th -
grade scores did create the appearance of steeper achievement growth than actually took place.
benchmark with
gains made by students who first entered 3rd
grade in 2001 and
scored below the FCAT benchmark.
In particular, since 2001 (that is, since NCLB was passed), there have been sizable
gains in NAEP 4th - and 8th -
grade math tests, small improvements in 4th - and 8th -
grade reading tests, and very little change in 12th -
grade scores.
Thus, I also assume that the state made no meaningful
gains in 4th -
grade reading between 1998 and 2000 that would have shown up on NAEP, which squares with the
scores on the state's own reading assessment.
Figures 1a, 1b, and 1c compare the average number of absences, the share of students who were suspended, and the average test -
score gains between fourth and eighth
grade of students who ranked in the bottom - and top - quartile on each skill.
By looking at the individual test
scores of each student in Florida, Winters is able to identify
gains in performance at the 3rd
grade level that were not influenced by the «anti-social promotion» policy.
At the 4th
grade level in math and reading, D.C. students
gained 6 scale
score points between 2007 and 2009, while the average
gain in the other districts was only 1 point and 2.2 points, respectively.
Students in states with «report card» systems, where
scores are publicly reported but no consequences are attached to performance, fell in the middle: they could expect to
gain 1.2 percent in achievement between
grades 4 and 8, over and above what they would normally learn from
grade to
grade.
For example, during the Rhee years, 4th -
grade students, in both reading and math,
gained an average of 3 points each year relative to the
scores earned by students nationwide, a
gain twice that of Rhee's predecessors.
Eighth -
grade math
scores among the highest performers also improved substantially over the period,
gaining 14 points nationally and 17 points in Texas (Figure 10).
Each school will be given
grades in six areas: (i) pupil academic progress (
gain scores); (ii) pupil attainment (of particular academic goals); (iii) the narrowing of gaps of high and low pupils in particular categories (low SES, minority, gender); (iv) parent opinions of the school's quality; (v) teacher and staff opinions of the school quality; and (vi) pupil opinions of the school quality.
These new systems depend primarily on two types of measurements: student test
score gains on statewide assessments in math and reading in
grades 4 - 8 that can be uniquely associated with individual teachers; and systematic classroom observations of teachers by school leaders and central staff.
At the 4th -
grade level, D.C. students in math and reading
gained 6 scale
score points between 2007 and 2009, while the average
gain in the other 10 cities for which comparable data are available was only 1 point and 2.2 points, respectively.
He reports, «With respect to the distribution of DC's total
gains in NAEP
scores over
grades 4 and 8 between 2000 - 09, Vance accounted for a 46 % share of the total
gain, Janey 30 % and Rhee 24 %.»
Either could explain why 4th -
grade scores were up throughout the state, and student
gains in Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers were even more impressive than in Gotham (see Hanushek, «Pseudo-Science»).
Participation in afterschool programs is influencing academic performance in a number of ways, including better attitudes toward school and higher educational aspirations; higher school attendance rates and lower tardiness rates; less disciplinary action, such as suspension; lower dropout rates; better performance in school, as measured by achievement test
scores and
grades; significant
gains in academic achievement test
scores; greater on - time promotion; improved homework completion; and deeper engagement in learning.
The
gains are not an artifact of the elimination of social promotion in 3rd
grade or of the ease with which low test
scores can be lifted.
On the Nation's Report Card's main tests, 4th and 8th
grade reading and math
scored gains in 49 of 50 states.
In states that had genuine alternative certification, test -
score gains on the NAEP exceeded those in the other states by 4.8 points and 7.6 points in 4th - and 8th -
grade math, respectively.
Also, there is much information to be
gained from having individual conversations with students who have these contradictions between their standardized test
scores and their classroom
grades and performance.
Provided the movement of teachers in and out of a
grade has not changed the makeup of students enrolled in that
grade, this finding supports the conclusion that measured value - added of teachers is an unbiased predictor of future test -
score gains, as there appears to be no other explanation for the resulting improvement in test
scores.
Here it is important to note again that a school's
grades are based not on its overall average scale
score but rather on the percentage of students meeting levels of proficiency and the percentage of students making adequate
gains on the tests.
The first and most rigorous of the studies, by Dan Goldhaber and Emily Anthony of the Urban Institute, found that on average North Carolina students in
grades 3 - 5 whose teachers were board certified
scored 7 to 15 percent higher on tests than students whose teachers attempted but failed to
gain certification.
In addition, all Florida schools are
graded from A to F based on the share of their student bodies that
scores at high levels on the FCAT and experiences
gains in their test
scores from year to year.
We developed a measure of how unusual the fluctuations in test
scores are by ranking each classroom's average test -
score gains against all other classrooms in that same subject,
grade, and year.
Black and Hispanic 4th
grade math
scores leaped forward by 18 points; in reading these
gains were a laudable 13 points and 9 points.
The four - point scale
score gain in fourth
grade science is not statistically significant.
(Actually, his biggest claim is that Bush's fourth -
grade reading performance is «infinitely» better than Obama's, but that's because there's been no
gain under Obama, not because under Bush
scores were numerically much better.)
All schools with at least 30 students in
grades 3 — 10 in two or more consecutive years will have standardized test
score gains analyzed by state researchers.
The first a scatterplot of the 8th
grade reading 2017
scores by
gains (2017 minus 2009
scores) for all 50 states and all 16 state charter sectors with
scores in both 2017 and 2009.
In reading there have been
gains in fourth
grade, but the national
scores for eighth graders were essentially the same in 2009 as they were in 1998.
In 2008, Brookings Institution scholar Tom Loveless reported that, while the nation's lowest - achieving students made significant
gains in fourth -
grade reading and math
scores from 2000 to 2007, top students made anemic
gains.
Our data set enabled us to examine the test -
score gains of individual students from
grade to
grade across three school years.
As support for his position that teachers, generally, are motivated, Richard referred to
gains in the fourth
grade mathematics
scores on NAEP for African American youngsters.
Because Alachua County's
gain scores tend to be larger than the national average, these are more conservative estimates of years of
gain than are those based on national
grade equivalents.)
«For math between 2009 - 09, Vance accounted for 46 %, of the share of the total
gain in NAEP
scores for both
grades 4 and 8, Janey 30 %, and Rhee 24 %.....
They claim that value - added studies that measure
gains from one point in time to the next fail to account for the fact that «two students can have pretest
scores and similar schooling conditions during a
grade and still emerge with different posttest
scores influenced by different earlier schooling conditions.»
In each of the four areas assessed (reading and math in fourth and eighth
grades), DCPS made statistically significant
gains in scale
scores.
The nation's paper of record characterized NAEP results as «mixed,» despite the fact that 4th
grade reading
scores have climbed by 11 points since 2002, with 4 points of that
gain appearing since NAEP's last measurement in 2007.
First, high school
scores might appear to be stagnant because not enough time has passed for the
gains from earlier
grades to show up in the test
scores of students in later
grades.
For reading between 2003 - 09, Janey accounted for 65 % of the total
gain in NAEP
scores over
grades 4 and 8, and Rhee accounted for 35 %.»