We expect that human observers will be able to continue to perform this task for a few years to come, but eventually we will have to refine existing techniques and develop new computational methods that can detect fine -
grained image details that may not be identifiable by the human visual system.»
Not exact matches
ALMA can see through the fine dust
grains and can pick up where more of the mass is located: although the
images do not provide fine
details, they can tell us how the disk structure is oriented.
The
image is clear and possesses a noticeable layer of film
grain in many scenes, and the
image detail is better than expected.
The Hustler's 2.35:1, 1080p transfer is entirely too smooth; while not as severely airbrushed as DVNR poster children Predator and Patton, the
image lacks texture (fine
detail proves frustratingly elusive) and depth — and, needless to say,
grain, finally costing the gritty black - and - white picture some of its social - realist capital.
Disney's approach to restoration was witchcraft in those early days of the format: Regarding celluloid as a transitory delivery system for animation, Disney archivists (somehow) managed to leach the
image of film
grain without harming fine
detail.
The 1.33:1 monochromatic
image is rendered in fairly high contrast, with an appropriate level of
grain, decent dynamic range, and plenty of
detail in the frame, even in the abundant shadows.
Fine
detail is tempered by the use of Panavision anamorphic lenses, enhancing the cinematic quality of a notably
grain - free — and thankfully noise - free —
image.
The disc is gorgeous, mastered in 2k from a composite fine -
grain 35 mm print, with excellent
detail and depth of
image.
THE BLU - RAY DISC by Bill Chambers Disregard what I speculated about the BD release of 300: I didn't think it would look better, just more artificial — but what the added resolution actually does is clarify the
details beneath the sandstorm of
grain, giving the
image greater depth and a more persuasive celluloid texture.
We received the former for review, which contains a 2.35:1 transfer of the film in anamorphic video; the
image is quirky in accordance with John Seale's cinematography:
grain is overemphasized in several climactic shots, as if to ground the ludicrous plot machinations in some kind of hard - edged reality, while blacks are chalky throughout and
detail has a filtered quality — a Lawrence Kasdan trademark.
The
images are sharp and highly
detailed down to each
grain of sand and speck of dirt.
This Blu - Ray Dual Format edition from The Criterion Collection boasts a truly beautiful black and white
image, with authentic natural film
grain, surprisingly good fine object
detail, and very little scratches or other anomalies.
Shot on a combo of 35 mm and 16 mm, the black and white Academy cropped
image contains plenty of
detail and contrast, even showing an adequate amount of film
grain.
The
image quality definitely advances in terms of overall clarity and
detail as well as treating the film
grain with respect, but it's not a mind - blowing difference.
The
image looks like a great 35 mm print from the era should, boasting the right amount of film
grain and picture
detail.
The film has a little more
grain than you might expect of such a 2016 big budget behemoth, but everything looks as it should and the
images are sharp, crisp, and suitably
detailed.
Transferred at 1.82:1 and enhanced for 16x9 displays, the theatrical version looks sensational, although it wants for more
detailed shadows; perhaps blacks were crushed on purpose, as the
image in and of itself has enough surface clarity to betray substantial — if unobjectionable —
grain.
The
image here mostly just falls down in shadow
detail, which is a significant issue for a film with as many low - light scenes as this one; this is not going to be a disc to show off your home theater, but it's a natural transfer that looks pretty much as one would remember the film looking in 1990,
grain and all.
Every nuance of the filmic
image seems to make its way into the transfer, which gets top marks in every category: natural - looking film
grain, spot - on color and contrast, inky blacks, and fine
detail.
The first Blu - ray release is cause for great joy for the 2.35:1
image hits all the marks in terms of great colour saturation, impressive
image detail, appropriate
grain levels, and a dearth of digital manipulation.
The Super 35 capture format ensures excellent fine
detail and a steady but refined light - medium
grain texturing that results in a pleasingly cinematic
image.
Take every
image detail with a
grain of salt, but according to the information provided, the next remaster will arrive on April 30, 2018.
It could be the equivalent of somebody looking at an old film, and realizing that the film came from a projector, and discovering that there is an
image in the projector, and that it's made of molecules of
grains of film - and then trying to find the mystery of the story by looking at ever more
detailed molecules of film, thinking, If I finally get to the heart of that, will it tell me where my story comes from?
The color sensor provides much of the data you actually see in your final
image, however, the monochrome sensor provides extra fine
grained detail in areas where a traditional color sensor would lose data.
I find noise reduction almost always reduces the
detail in your
images, and I find
grain on modern iPhones fairly pleasant to look at.
Images taken in low - light areas have the
grain and
detail softness that you'd come to expect for a phone of this price, but what struck me the most was just how slow the camera gets when trying to take a photo even when you're indoors during the daytime.
We captured
images in both day and night, the daylight
images come with vibrant colors and
details, however, a little bit
grains can be seen with low light
images.