Sentences with phrase «grant review panels at»

Not exact matches

The AGIES panel's «perception was flavored by its public - health perspective on scientific arguments», says Grant McFadden, a poxvirus researcher at the University of Florida in Gainesville and a member of the scientific review panel.

In June 2011, the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) Center for Scientific Review (CSR) debuted a program aimed at leveling the playing field — somewhat — by giving young researchers experience on grant - review panels so that they could see what they look for in the grant applications they choose toReview (CSR) debuted a program aimed at leveling the playing field — somewhat — by giving young researchers experience on grant - review panels so that they could see what they look for in the grant applications they choose toreview panels so that they could see what they look for in the grant applications they choose to fund.

«It's a bit nerve - wracking, not because there are no special grants for it, but because there's no special expertise on the review panels,» says Leonard Maler, a professor in the department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine at the University of Ottawa.

The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, for example, received more than four times its usual number of applications owing to cuts in NIH spending on breast cancer research, according to Paula Witt - Enderby, a researcher at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh and a member of the charity's grant review panel.

At a commission event in Brussels on Tuesday, an attendee suggested that funding review panels might also be biased against grant proposals that include U.K. participants.

Bob Godt, a professor at the Medical College of Georgia in Augusta who also sits on NIH review panels, describes his grant - writing experience while doing research in Sweden.

In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented research.

The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) manages the peer review process for approximately 70 % of the grant applications submitted to NIH; the remainder are reviewed in peer review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers aReview (CSR) manages the peer review process for approximately 70 % of the grant applications submitted to NIH; the remainder are reviewed in peer review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers areview process for approximately 70 % of the grant applications submitted to NIH; the remainder are reviewed in peer review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers areview panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers at NIH.

The risk with these competitions when carried out by the Office of the Secretary is that they become politicized, that they are judged by review panels without methodological competence, and that they are overseen, once awarded, by career staff in program offices that do not have the background to monitor what is, at root, a program evaluation grant.

A panel of judges from the San Francisco Bay Area book community will review applications and the Scholarship Grant recipient (s) will be publicly recognized at a Book Promotion Forum event and asked to contribute an article for the e-Newsletter.

Bates has presented at national conferences on public art, juried numerous contemporary art exhibitions, and has served on public art review committees and grant selection panels for the New York State Council on the Arts and the New York Foundation for the Arts.

In late 2014 he was an Evaluator for Creative Capital's 2015 Visual Arts grant award review panel; most recently he was a visiting curator at the Joan Mitchell Center in New Orleans, and will be a guest lecturer at the University of Florida in Spring 2017.

Special programs are evaluated in panels (center grants, etc.) Panels, which tend to look at proposals over a large range of fields, will often receive written reviews from expanels (center grants, etc.) Panels, which tend to look at proposals over a large range of fields, will often receive written reviews from exPanels, which tend to look at proposals over a large range of fields, will often receive written reviews from experts.