He has also served on
grant review panels for Florida State University, the Community Foundation of Middle TN and the New Jersey State Council on the Arts.
Witt - Enderby is on
the grant review panel for the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer charity, which is placing greater emphasis on translational research, and a corresponding increase in suitable bids.
Not exact matches
UPDATE, 4:25 pm EST: A different New York judge has
granted DraftKings and FanDuel an «emergency stay» of the injunction order; it means the companies can,
for now, continue to operate in New York until an appellate
panel reviews the injunction on January 4.
[BOX 5] Alliance of Third Class Non-Profit Mailers, 1981 - 1982 Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) files I, 1981 II, 1980 - 1981 III, 1978 - 1980 IV, 1979 - 1980 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1969 - 1981 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1981 - 1982 Department of Education, 1977 - 1978 Energy Research Advisory Board Multiprogram Laboratory
Panel, 10/15/81 -11 / 19/82 Institute of Medicine - I, 1982 - 1983 Institute of Medicine - II, 1979 - 1982 Roger W. Jones Award, 1979 - 1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1982 Mellon (Andrew W.) Project, 1978 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: I, 1981 - 1984 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: II, 1981 - 1982 National Committee on Public Employee Pension Systems (PEPS), July 1982 National Governors» Association Meeting - Task Force on Technological Innovation, 2/21/82 National Publication Act of 1979 Office of Technology Assessment, 1972 - 1973 Peace and Conflict Resolution, 1980 Pensions
for Professionals, 1971 - 1972 Saturday
Review of Science, 1972 - 1979 Scientists and Engineers Emigrant Fund, 1978 - 1979 SOHIO, Standard Oil of Ohio
Grant, 1982 - 1986 Technology in Science - Advisory Board, 1981 Tyler Prize, 1984 - 1985 White House Study of Science and Engineering Education, 1980 Znaiye (Soviet Scholarly Society), 1971 - 1977
In particular, the researchers want the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to reinstate face - to - face meetings of peer
review panels, which the agency has ended in favor of an on - line system
for evaluating
grant proposals.
In June 2011, the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) Center
for Scientific
Review (CSR) debuted a program aimed at leveling the playing field — somewhat — by giving young researchers experience on grant - review panels so that they could see what they look for in the grant applications they choose to
Review (CSR) debuted a program aimed at leveling the playing field — somewhat — by giving young researchers experience on
grant -
review panels so that they could see what they look for in the grant applications they choose to
review panels so that they could see what they look
for in the
grant applications they choose to fund.
Farajidavar secured priceless advice about
grant funding practices from his PI, who had served on
review panels for several national agencies.
«It's a bit nerve - wracking, not because there are no special
grants for it, but because there's no special expertise on the
review panels,» says Leonard Maler, a professor in the department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine at the University of Ottawa.
The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation,
for example, received more than four times its usual number of applications owing to cuts in NIH spending on breast cancer research, according to Paula Witt - Enderby, a researcher at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh and a member of the charity's
grant review panel.
In particular, the researchers want the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to reinstate face - to - face meetings of peer -
review panels, which the agency has ended in favor of an online system
for evaluating
grant proposals.
Annual or semiannual
grant deadlines lead to enormous spikes in submissions, which in turn cause headaches
for the program managers who have to organize merit
review panels.
Beaudet also indicated CIHR is postponing the deadline on a forthcoming
grant competition until after the working group meets, and Philpott said the results of the meeting will be expected to inform the findings of a recently launched Advisory
Panel for the
Review of Federal Support
for Fundamental Science.
[4] CIHR continues to work on issues regarding the size and membership of the expert
panels, the use of teleconferencing in early stage
review, and the algorithms used to match applications to reviewers, issues which will need to be resolved prior to the next competition
for both «Foundation» and «Project»
grants, scheduled
for fall 2016.
In managing RPB's extensive and highly regarded
Grants Program, Patricia Moran interfaces with more than 50 of the nation's top departments of ophthalmology and more than 120 active researchers, coordinates the activities of RPB's
grant review panels, and provides analytical support
for special projects.
She has served on federal
grant review panels, the NIH / NEI National Advisory Eye Council, and she is a fellow of the Association
for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (FARVO), American Academy of Optometry (FAAO) and a board member of the International Society
for the Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV).
In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the
panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs
for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The
panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer
review groups so that patient - oriented
grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the
grant applications involve patient - oriented research.
The Center
for Scientific
Review (CSR) manages the peer review process for approximately 70 % of the grant applications submitted to NIH; the remainder are reviewed in peer review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers a
Review (CSR) manages the peer
review process for approximately 70 % of the grant applications submitted to NIH; the remainder are reviewed in peer review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers a
review process
for approximately 70 % of the
grant applications submitted to NIH; the remainder are
reviewed in peer
review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers a
review panels managed by the various funding institutes and centers at NIH.
Grant applications are
reviewed for funding by a
panel of scientists from outside of California.
These issues, along with the fact that the Obama administration seems not to be paying attention to what is happening inside the states to which waivers have been
granted, and has generally ignored concerns raised by its own peer
review panels about waiver proposals, makes it hard
for centrist Democrat reformers to make the case that the School Reformer - in - Chief is doing a credible job advancing reform.
Susan currently Chairs the University Club of Boston's Scholarship Committee as well as serves on EDVestors»
Grant Review panel and is an Executive Advisor
for the Lynch Leadership Academy.
A
panel of judges from the San Francisco Bay Area book community will
review applications and the Scholarship
Grant recipient (s) will be publicly recognized at a Book Promotion Forum event and asked to contribute an article
for the e-Newsletter.
In late 2014, he was selected as an Evaluator
for Creative Capital's 2015 Visual Arts
Grant Award
review panel.
Bates has presented at national conferences on public art, juried numerous contemporary art exhibitions, and has served on public art
review committees and
grant selection
panels for the New York State Council on the Arts and the New York Foundation
for the Arts.
Grant Criteria All proposals
for the Kindling Fund are
reviewed by a
panel of artists and / or arts professionals.
In late 2014 he was an Evaluator
for Creative Capital's 2015 Visual Arts
grant award
review panel; most recently he was a visiting curator at the Joan Mitchell Center in New Orleans, and will be a guest lecturer at the University of Florida in Spring 2017.
Creative Capital's selection process
for awarding
grants has three phases: inquiry, application and
panel review.
• Speaker, National Pathways to Adulthood: A convening on Youth in Transition — 2011 • Centenary Methodist, Speaker, Homeless / Runaway Youth Awareness Workshops — 2011 • Speaker, Missouri SYAB Youth Empowerment Conference — 2011 • Federal
Grant Reviewer, Administration
for Children and Families: Improving Service Delivery to Youth in the Child Welfare System — 2011 • Federal
Grant Reviewer, Office of Family Assistance: Healthy Marriage Promotion and Responsible Father - Hood
Grants — 2011 • Federal
Grant Reviewer, Administration of Children and Families
Grant Review: Improving Outcomes
for Youth in Childwelfare — 2011 • Federal
Grant Reviewer, Administration of Children and Families
Grant Review: Community Centered Healthy Marriage and Fatherhood — 2011 • Federal
Panel Chair, Administration of Children and Families
Grant Review: Pathways to Responsible Fatherhood — 2011