Sentences with phrase «grant review study»
For the National Institutes of Health, he has served as an ad hoc and standing reviewer member for a number of grant review study sections.
http://www.KesslerFoundation.org/ Not exact matches
Federal student loans of all types are included in the FAFSA review, as well as work - study and grant opportunities.
See Ilona Babenko and Richard Sen, «Money Left on the Table: An Analysis of Participation in Employee Stock Purchase Plans, Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014): 3658 - 3698; 4) Stock held after the exercise of granted stock options or grants of restricted stock.
Approval for the study was granted by the University and Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
The governor's unusual effort — potentially granting mass clemency on a level rarely seen — comes as efforts to reform the state's juvenile justice laws have met resistance in the Legislature; most states have raised the age of criminal responsibility after reviewing studies that showed people are often not psychologically mature until early adulthood.
Times / Review Executive Editor Grant Parpan, who moderated the one - hour debate, asked the candidates if the district's legislator should be a member of the Shelter Island Ferry Study Group, a committee Mr. Romaine opted out of.
[BOX 5] Alliance of Third Class Non-Profit Mailers, 1981 - 1982 Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) files I, 1981 II, 1980 - 1981 III, 1978 - 1980 IV, 1979 - 1980 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1969 - 1981 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1981 - 1982 Department of Education, 1977 - 1978 Energy Research Advisory Board Multiprogram Laboratory Panel, 10/15/81 -11 / 19/82 Institute of Medicine - I, 1982 - 1983 Institute of Medicine - II, 1979 - 1982 Roger W. Jones Award, 1979 - 1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1982 Mellon (Andrew W.) Project, 1978 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: I, 1981 - 1984 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: II, 1981 - 1982 National Committee on Public Employee Pension Systems (PEPS), July 1982 National Governors» Association Meeting - Task Force on Technological Innovation, 2/21/82 National Publication Act of 1979 Office of Technology Assessment, 1972 - 1973 Peace and Conflict Resolution, 1980 Pensions for Professionals, 1971 - 1972 Saturday Review of Science, 1972 - 1979 Scientists and Engineers Emigrant Fund, 1978 - 1979 SOHIO, Standard Oil of Ohio Grant, 1982 - 1986 Technology in Science - Advisory Board, 1981 Tyler Prize, 1984 - 1985 White House Study of Science and Engineering Education, 1980 Znaiye (Soviet Scholarly Society), 1971 - 1977
Floyd Wormley Jr., a microbiologist at the University of Texas, San Antonio, serves as a standing member on NIH's AIDS - associated Opportunistic Infections and Cancer study section, which reviews grant proposals on that topic, scores them, and forwards the best ones to the appropriate NIH institutes for the final funding decision.
AHRQ shares the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant application and review processes, including those for research studies (e.g. R01, R03), training (K - series), and small business.
In the meantime, a spokesman for the National Institutes of Health says that no study has yet been funded and the institute's policy is «not to comment on whether such a grant was submitted or is under review.»
«Overall, this was a great opportunity to learn about this process as part of a graduate course before going out into the real world to review grants as PIs do on actual study sections,» she says.
But counselors like Peterson are looking to change that, by offering advice on how to review papers and grant proposals and how to effectively serve on grant panels and study sections.
«In fact,» LeDoux says with a smile, «my first grant on this topic in the early 1980s was turned down,» because scientists reviewing his application believed it was impossible to scientifically study emotions.
As a graduate student, Bankston participated in a grant - writing course that included a chance to review grant proposals in a simulated study section.
The panel found that the existing grant review process, in which NHP studies undergo extra scrutiny by NC3Rs, generally works: Most research was justified in its use of NHPs and led to peer - reviewed publications.
Each institute sends a representative program officer to observe the study section proceedings and take notes about what happens during the review of each grant.
NIH now requires a recipient of a grant in excess of $ 500,000 in any year to develop a data sharing plan that is reviewed by the study section that assesses the grant proposal, Liu said.
NIH program officers, or program directors as they are sometimes called, serve as scientific liaison between the study section that reviews your grant and the institute that will hopefully be funding your work.
Ask several colleagues who have study section experience to review your grant.
[BOX 3: Grants and Contracts] Financial Statements, 1957 - 1959 Financial Reports, 1957 - 1959 Financial Statements, 1958 Financial Reports 1960-1961 1962 1963 1964-1965 1966-1967 Report on Review of Source Data Preparation for Accounting Purposes, Oct. 1961 AAAS Budgets, 1968 - 1969 Financial Reports, 1968 - 1969 Financial Statements and Accountant's Opinion, 1969 Financial Statements and Accountant's Opinion, 1970 Financial Reports, 1970 - 1971 Financial Reports, 1972 Financial Reports from Operations, 1979 Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 1974 and Projections to 1963 Report for Examination of Financial Statements and Additional Information, 1983 - 1984 Closed out Funds and Stocks AAAS Grants Committee, 1955 AID Audit - Mexico City, 1974 Asia Foundation, 1955 - 1975 Boston Concerts Carnegie Corp. - Grant to AAAS for Science Teaching Improvement Program Graham Chedd - Contract [3 folders], 1973 - 1977 DOS - AID Irene Tinker, 1973 - 1977 RISM Research for the Study of Man, 1973 - 1977 Smithsonian, 1971 - 1977 Audit, 1973 - 1977 Close Out, 1976 - 1978 GE Grant - Regional Consultants on Science Teaching, 1956 Gordon Marshall, Exhibits Contract, 1952 National Endowment of the Arts, 1973 NSF Grant - Soviet Science, 1952 Training Talented Students, 1955 Travelling High School Library, 1956 Gordon Conference on Teacher Education, 1956 Junior Academies Workshop, 1957 Proposal to NSF for Development of Science Teaching Materials for Elementary and Junior High Schools, 1961 Progress Report to the NSF on the Holiday Science Lecture Program, 1963 Proposal to the NSF for 1964 Visiting Foreign Staff Project, 1963 NSF - US - Japan Comparative Science Program, 1963 NSF - US - Japan Cooperative Science Program, 1964 WGBH, 1972 Willis Shapley, Contract Agreement, Oct. 1978 DHEW - Barrier Free Meetings, Oct. 1977 CBS News - Conquest Program Series, 1959 MISCO Contract - original, 1972 Basic Books Publishing - New Roads to Yesterday, 1963 - 1966
Program in Engineering Studies, Stanford University IREX, International Research and Exchange Board Korea Science Foundation National Academy of Engineering National Academy of Science National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges OAS OECD Review of U.S. paper for OECD workshop, Fall 1981 Operation Crossroads Africa, Inc..
Institutional Review Board approval and written consent were obtained for the study, which was funded by an investigator - initiated grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ENDP).
To answer these questions, we invited panelists with experience reviewing NIH grant proposals and participating in study section to share their experiences and advice with us.
The study is one of two NIH - funded projects — the other strips previous applications of all identifying characteristics before subjecting them to a new round of reviews — now underway that were spawned by a 2011 finding that black scientists have a much lower chance of receiving an NIH grant than their white counterparts.
OCEAN SPRINGS, Miss. — A team of university and government scientists, selected by an expert review panel convened by the Mississippi - Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, will conduct an independent study to estimate the number of red snapper in the U.S. waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
Previously, Toliver had served as the executive secretary (scientific review administrator) of the biochemistry study section of the NIH Division of Research Grants (now called the Center for Scientific Rereview administrator) of the biochemistry study section of the NIH Division of Research Grants (now called the Center for Scientific ReviewReview).
This recommendation was rooted in an earlier observation by Williams et al, 19 based on both priority scores and funding rates, that clinical grant applications do not fare as well in the review process when evaluated by study sections reviewing relatively few clinical applications.
CSR organizes the peer review groups or study sections that evaluate the majority (70 %) of the research grant applications sent to NIH.
He also serves as a peer reviewer for various scientific journals in the field of cancer research and immunology and as reviewer for grants in scientific review study sections of the NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI).
In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented research.
The study was based on a single grant review cycle.
She has served on NIH Study Sections and EMSC grant review panels.
Using the tools described on that page, you can get an overview of similar funded projects, experts in your field, their publications and grants, and study sections that reviewed their applications.
She was a permanent member of several NIH grant review panels and chair of the NIH Skeletal Biology Development and Disease Study Section.
He has served as a visiting scholar at Harvard University, on the Chemical Reviews Editorial Advisory Board, the Governor's Mathematics and Science Advisory Board for South Carolina, the Defense Science Study Group through the Institute for Defense Analyses, the Defense Science Board Chem / Nano Study Section, the Department of Commerce Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee and the MD Anderson Cancer Research Center's Competitive Grant Renewal Board.
Quantitative methods involved descriptive statistical analyses of teachers» ratings of 37 different social studies lessons posted in the lesson archive of a grant - funded collection of lesson plans created through a process of development, field - testing, peer review, and evaluation.
Customers who are interested in their service can order essays, term and research papers, thesis papers, dissertations, reports, reviews, speeches, presentations, case studies, coursework, homework, creative writing, critical thinking papers, annotated bibliographies, capstone projects, grant proposals and research reports.
Federal student loans of all types are included in the FAFSA review, as well as work - study and grant opportunities.
The Foundation's Large Animal Scientific Advisory Board reviewed all submitted grant applications and selected, based on scientific merit and impact, the studies with the greatest potential to save lives, preserve health and advance veterinary care.
With the help of our expert review panel, grants are awarded twice yearly to fund groundbreaking studies.
The Foundation's Wildlife Scientific Advisory Board reviewed 168 submitted grant applications and selected, based on scientific merit and impact, the studies with the greatest potential to save lives and species, preserve health, and advance veterinary care.
The Foundation's Wildlife Scientific Advisory Board reviewed all submitted grant applications and selected, based on scientific merit and impact, the studies with the greatest potential to save lives, preserve health, and advance veterinary care.
Morris Animal Foundation's Large Animal Scientific Advisory Board reviewed all grant applications and selected, based on scientific merit and impact, the studies that had the greatest potential to advance equine veterinary care and wellness.
The Foundation's Small Animal Scientific Advisory Board reviewed all submitted grant applications and selected, based on scientific merit and impact, the studies with the greatest potential to save lives, preserve health, and advance veterinary care.
NIH NIAMS, Center for Scientific Review, Orthopedic and Musculoskeletal study sections (SBSR, SBDD), R01 grant review (AReview, Orthopedic and Musculoskeletal study sections (SBSR, SBDD), R01 grant review (Areview (Ad Hoc)
Review committees use this method because publications are the best measure of past and potential scientific output, but by potentially overvaluing «high impact» journal names, these committees and study sections effectively defer to journal editors to help them choose the best candidates for jobs and grants.
Landmark peer - reviewed study shows deforestation drops dramatically the same year land rights are granted to indigenous communities in Peru.
I suppose you could disagree with that statement, perhaps you and I can get a grant and study whether that statement is true of false and then submit our conclusion to a climate journal and get peer - reviewed so we could know if in fact climatologists consult with statisticians or not.
The findings of the study were 1 in 6 would discriminate in presentation or review, 1 in 4 for grant applications and 1 in 3 for for hiring.
Jennifer Farrell, who teaches income taxation and international tax law, has received a seed grant worth $ 21,292 for her project called «Blockchain and taxation: A case study on eliminating the sales tax gap» from the Western Social Sciences and Humanities Review Board.