Sentences with phrase «grant reviewers for»

She regularly attends local film festivals and has served as a grant reviewer for Austin Film Society.

The best decision I made in the last year is deciding to become a grant reviewer for the Pedigree Foundation, which is a charitable foundation dedicated to helping dogs in need.

She has served as a grant reviewer for the Getty and an advisor to the Terra Foundation for American Art, the Getty Conservation Institute and the Public Diplomacy Programs of the U.S. Department of State.

Not exact matches

Wagstaff, a chemist with a Ph.D. in STEM education research and an affinity for increasing diversity and inclusion in STEM, led an agency - wide effort to broaden NIJ's pool of peer reviewers, STEM graduate fellows, and R&D grant applicants.

After doing so, I can help investigators sharpen their logic by, for instance, suggesting information they should add to justify their proposed research activities more convincingly or identifying red herrings (arguments that are not centrally relevant to the grant topic and may confuse the reviewer).

This is especially true for grant proposals: If the first page doesn't compel the reviewer's interest in 3 minutes, the proposal is toast.

He said that DOE will need 300 to 400 reviewers in the next 6 months to handle the expected flood of grant applications triggered by DOE's share of the $ 787 billion stimulus package and the hike in its annual budget for 2009.

For the grants submitted by the «non-preferred» investigators, the three reviewers could reduce their scores by a little, a lot, or not at all.

That response is tiny compared with the 20,000 applications submitted for Challenge Grants, which 15,000 reviewers are now rushing to evaluate.

Experienced grant writers often encourage less experienced colleagues to do the reviewers» work for them.

Editors and granting agency program officers are always looking for new reviewers — they need fresh perspectives to provide high - quality reviews.

For now, young researchers have to rely on what Smith calls the open - mindedness of grant reviewers.

To convince administrators and grant reviewers of the worthiness of their work, scientists have to be cheerleaders for their research; they may not be as

While you may be viewing your grant application as the magnum opus of your life's ambitions and plans — for the next 5 years anyway — a reviewer sees it as one of six to 12 other «magnum opii» projects to evaluate.

The bill language is ambiguous, calling for disclosure of «[t] he employer, and either the name and title or a unique identifier, of each individual who served as a peer reviewer for the grant program» during the previous 6 months.

So the bill calls for greater reliance on preproposals, withholding the nonresearch components of a grant proposal until reviewers have given it a thumbs up, and creating a centralized database with the biosketches of applicants so that information doesn't have to be recreated for every agency.

A team of «seasoned» scientific reviewers and scientists provide grant - writing tips based on the PHS 398 application, the application form used for most NIH grants, including R01 research grants, fellowships, and career training grants.

[4] CIHR continues to work on issues regarding the size and membership of the expert panels, the use of teleconferencing in early stage review, and the algorithms used to match applications to reviewers, issues which will need to be resolved prior to the next competition for both «Foundation» and «Project» grants, scheduled for fall 2016.

NIMH will also work to improve communication and outreach by providing webinars and conference presentations for applicants about clinical trials, and will work to ensure a consistent understanding of this approach by grant reviewers.

Failure to disclose substantial financial or other conflicts of interest to internal or external monitoring bodies, organisations or publishers upon preparation, submission or publication of a manuscript or a grant application, or while acting as a reviewer for scholarly journals, funding agencies, or as a member of internal and external career advancement and recruitment committees or other professional duties.

Ad hoc reviewer for several grant agencies including: Wellcome Trust, European Commission, Medical Research Council of UK, Funding for Scientific Research of Belgium, National Research Agency of France, National Cancer Institute of France, the Broad Foundation for Scientific and Medical Research of USA, Health Research Board of Ireland, Italian Ministry of University and Research, Italian Ministry of Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Italian - German University, Italian National Research Council, Al Neelain University of the Islamic Republic of Sudan, Cancéropôle Grand Ouest of the French government, Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, Ministry of Science, Technology and Space State of the State of Israel, Cancer Research Wales, Kuwait University.

He also serves as a peer reviewer for various scientific journals in the field of cancer research and immunology and as reviewer for grants in scientific review study sections of the NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI).

I am an expert reviewer of AERES («Agence d'évaluation de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur», France), reviewer of grant proposals for the National Science Foundation (NSF), USA and Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), as well as reviewer of several scientific journals.

He is a peer reviewer for several prestigious journals, and has received numerous grants, prizes and awards.

For the National Institutes of Health, he has served as an ad hoc and standing reviewer member for a number of grant review study sectioFor the National Institutes of Health, he has served as an ad hoc and standing reviewer member for a number of grant review study sectiofor a number of grant review study sections.

In 2007, the last year for which figures are available, 19 percent of the grants awarded to individual scientists were made as exceptions, or given outside of rankings by scientific reviewers, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office provided to The New York Times.

Eight schools received launch grants to support their opening this fall, and, in a smart new category of grants, 30 schools intending to launch programs in the fall of 2014 received funds to help them in their planning process (full disclosure: I served as a reviewer for the launch grants).

I've written previously about its role in creating proof points capable of scaling for the field that help propel the education system more toward a fully competency - based, student - centric one, and now NGLC is at it again (full disclosure: I serve as a reviewer for their grants).

Over his career, Dr. Olsen has been awarded six U.S. and international patents, has served as the principal investigator for ten research projects, has published over seventeen peer reviewed papers, has been a reviewer for Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) grant proposals, and has presented numerous papers at statistical, polygraph, and training conferences.

The director of the institute, Edward A. Curran, has recommended that the nie expand its current list of grant - proposal reviewers to include at least 100 additional people — who would be paid by nie to evaluate unsolicited requests for a total of up to $ 1 million in grants for 15 to 20 federal projects.

Wood, who began his career as a social studies and history teacher in South Carolina, says he didn't really understand the impact of policy on what he did in the classroom until U.S. Secretary of Education Richard Riley invited him to Washington in 1993 to write the guidelines and serve as chief reviewer for the department's new Technology Innovation Challenge Grants program.

Support for competitive programs, even among reformers, is apt to plummet as it becomes clear that the vagaries of peer reviewers and the prowess of grant writers are what drive results in such competitions, not true policy change, political courage, leadership or public commitment to reform.

The U.S. Department of Education's Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) is seeking peer reviewers for the School Leadership Grant program.

The Office of Safe and Healthy Students (OSHS) is seeking peer reviewers to evaluate FY14 grant proposals for the Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Program, the Project Prevent Grant Program, Grants to SEAs for Emergency Management, and the School Climate Transformation Grant Progrant proposals for the Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Program, the Project Prevent Grant Program, Grants to SEAs for Emergency Management, and the School Climate Transformation Grant ProGrant Program, Grants to SEAs for Emergency Management, and the School Climate Transformation Grant ProGrant Program.

The Department of Education is seeking individuals from diverse backgrounds and professions — including preK — 12 and postsecondary educators, educational evaluators, social entrepreneurs, strategy consultants, and grant makers — to serve as peer reviewers for its 2012 Investing in Innovation (i3) Grant Competigrant makers — to serve as peer reviewers for its 2012 Investing in Innovation (i3) Grant CompetiGrant Competition.

Those interested in reviewing applications for the competitive grant program should register online as soon as possible, according to the department's call for peer reviewers.

Call For Peer Reviewers: Charter Schools Program Grant Competition The U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, is seeking individuals to serve as peer reviewers for the Fiscal Year 2018 Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grant competitioFor Peer Reviewers: Charter Schools Program Grant Competition The U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, is seeking individuals to serve as peer reviewers for the Fiscal Year 2018 Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grant compReviewers: Charter Schools Program Grant Competition The U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, is seeking individuals to serve as peer reviewers for the Fiscal Year 2018 Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grant compreviewers for the Fiscal Year 2018 Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grant competitiofor the Fiscal Year 2018 Charter Schools Program (CSP) Grant competitions.

Peer reviewers will independently read, score, and provide timely, well - written comments, as well as be available to discuss their scoring and comments, for the eligible grant applications submitted to the U.S. Department of Education under the CSP.

Sarah has worked in education for ten years as a special education teacher and in a variety of teacher leader roles including: Special Education and Disproportionality Grant Coordinator, WASC coordinator, member of the California State Network of Educators reviewing formative assessment and professional development material for the Smarter Balanced Consortium's Digital Library, and Race to the Top Peer Reviewer for the 2013 District Grant Competition.

Taking into account the comments of the peer reviewers, we will review requests for this flexibility and, if appropriate, grant waivers through the 2013 − 2014 school year, after which time an SEA may request an extension of the flexibility.

But to focus on Jack's tortured soul, as so many reviewers have done, is to duplicate an injury that Robinson condemns within the novel — that of overlooking and taking for granted the state of Glory's soul.

This is the company, elsevier, with spectacular profit rates, whch gets its material (papers, books) which have mostly been produced at public expense (university salaries, public research grants), do very little actual editorial work (one usually has to supply papers charts etc «print ready»), get academic reviewers to review the books and papers free of charge (well, paid for by universities or they do it in free time), depend on journal editors whose time is paid for by (generally publicly funded) universities, then sells the journals to the same universities, sometimes for subscription prices in the thousands of dollars.

Dr. Ricardo M. Stockler, an assistant professor in the Department of Clinical Sciences and head of the Food Animal Ambulatory Service, has been selected to serve as a peer - reviewer for the 2017 Veterinary Services Grant Program by U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Institute for Food & Agriculture.

With colleagues that can end up being reviewers for your papers, or for your grant applications, you'd better be collegial, at least in the open.

He was recently selected by the Massachusetts Life Sciences Center to serve as a peer reviewer for its Small Business Matching Grant (SBMG) Program, which promotes the life sciences within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Typical duties of a Grant Reviewer are processing applications, maintaining filing systems, collecting data, writing reports, forwarding their findings to supervisors, and providing advice to those who apply for a gGrant Reviewer are processing applications, maintaining filing systems, collecting data, writing reports, forwarding their findings to supervisors, and providing advice to those who apply for a grantgrant.

American Psychological Society Member, Western Psychological Association Member, American Psychological Society Grant Proposal Reviewer, Psi Chi International Honors Society for Psychology

• Speaker, National Pathways to Adulthood: A convening on Youth in Transition — 2011 • Centenary Methodist, Speaker, Homeless / Runaway Youth Awareness Workshops — 2011 • Speaker, Missouri SYAB Youth Empowerment Conference — 2011 • Federal Grant Reviewer, Administration for Children and Families: Improving Service Delivery to Youth in the Child Welfare System — 2011 • Federal Grant Reviewer, Office of Family Assistance: Healthy Marriage Promotion and Responsible Father - Hood Grants — 2011 • Federal Grant Reviewer, Administration of Children and Families Grant Review: Improving Outcomes for Youth in Childwelfare — 2011 • Federal Grant Reviewer, Administration of Children and Families Grant Review: Community Centered Healthy Marriage and Fatherhood — 2011 • Federal Panel Chair, Administration of Children and Families Grant Review: Pathways to Responsible Fatherhood — 2011

Reader and reviewer of HS / EHS grants for the Office of Head Start and the Office of Family Assistance.

Dr. Lanius is an ad hoc reviewer for numerous journals and granting agencies.