Sentences with phrase «granted by a jury»

All works on display are eligible for various awards to be granted by a jury of art professionals.

However, the court found that the expert testimony upon which the jury award was based was too speculative to support the amount granted by the jury.

Not exact matches

That democracy can be made to work, that by the scientific method we can gain mastery over the latent resources of the universe, that trial by jury is practicable, that torture is a foolish method of seeking evidence in the courts, that chattel slavery is a failure — such things we take for granted, not because we individually are wiser than our forebears, who disbelieved them all, but because we share in a social tradition which we did not even help to create, but which has shaped and conformed our thinking with irresistible power.

The international OWA award will be granted for the fifth time by the organic food producer Rapunzel and IFOAM - Organics International.From the nominees a jury... more

He goes on to demonstrate how fundamental safeguards that I was brought up to take for granted - habeas corpus, trial by jury, the presumption of innocence - have been weakened.

By law, the judge pointed out, neither lawyer can be compelled to testify before a grand jury unless granted immunity from prosecution.

A state appeals court has granted a request by NYC Public Advocate Tish James and others to reconsider whether the grand jury proceedings in the case of Eric Garner should be made public.

The report chronicling Schneiderman's year - long investigation into the shooting death of Edson Thevenin, 37, highlighted the controversial decision by Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel E. Abelove to secretly grant immunity to Sgt. Randall French when the officer testified before a grand jury that cleared him of wrongdoing.

Hours after the I - Team reached out, a lawyer for Westchester county and its jail medical provider filed a letter with the court expressing concern the publicizing of Grant's deposition could taint the jury pool, and suggesting there had been a misunderstanding that would be cleared up by Wednesday.

Finally granted a hearing from the parole board, Frank pleads his innocence, but the parole board is headed by Grayce (Victor Jury), the man responsible for his imprisonment, and his parole is denied, and Frank becomes more hardened and embittered.

Hoping to complete the hat trick begun by Benh Zeitlin's «Beasts of the Southern Wild,» the recipient of two SFFS / KRF (Kenneth Rainin Foundation) postproduction grants that captured the U.S. dramatic Grand Jury Prize in 2012, and «Fruitvale Station,» writer - director Kat Candler's «Hellion» will vie for the Grand Jury Prize in the U.S. narrative competition.

Heidi Saman Writer / director Named one of Filmmaker Magazine's «25 New Faces to Watch,» Heidi Saman's first feature film, Namour, won the Jury Award at the 2016 Los Angeles Film Festival and was developed with the Sundance Institute and funded by the Panavision New Filmmaker Grant and a Knight Foundation Grant.

Institutions represented by The Ruth Toor Grant for Strong Public School Libraries jury can be eligible to apply, but committee members must recuse themselves from the discussion, voting or decline the nomination if they have a conflict of interest.

The nominated candidates» images were viewed for grant consideration through an anonymous process by a jury panel of artists and curators.

THE MOHN AWARD │ Jury award honoring artistic excellence Created in conjunction with the inaugural Made in L.A. exhibition in 2012, the $ 100,000 Mohn Award will be granted over two years to an artist from the exhibition and will be accompanied by the publication of a monograph on the artist's work, including essays and interviews, that will be distributed to key influential international curators, critics, gallerists, museums, and collectors.

The second winner of the Re Rebaudengo Serpentine Grant was Riccardo Paratore (b. 1990, Germany), who was selected on 10 October by the International Jury.

By submission for jurying, artists whose submissions are chosen for the exhibition grant The Center for Fine Art Photography the right to use their images for the purpose of promoting the artist, promoting the Center's programs, promoting exhibitions and subsequent display on the Center's website of current and past exhibitions.

The nominated candidates» images were viewed for grant consideration through an anonymous process by a jury panel.

By submission for jurying, artists whose submissions are chosen for the exhibition grant The Center for Fine Art Photography the right to use their images for the purpose of promoting exhibitions, promoting the Center's programs, promoting the artist and subsequent display on the Center's website of current and past exhibitions.

There are twelve exhibiting artists up for a solo show at PULSE New York and a cash grant awarded selected by a jury.

Since 2015, WaveMaker has awarded forty grants through a juried process supporting projects that are non-commercial, non-institutional, stimulate critical thinking and dialogue, and expose audiences to innovative artistic practices typically under - recognized by traditional venues.

The Hopper Prize The Hopper Prize is a grant - making institution and exhibition platform offering a series of individual artist grants totaling $ 5,000.00 USD administered through an open call juried by leading curators.

Juried by Toby Jurovics 2006, 5th Annual Joyce Elaine Grant Photography Exhibition, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX.

The New Museum's Rhizome and Tumblr have banded together to launch a new Internet Art Grant, to be doled out by a jury featuring very busy New Museum / Venice Biennale curator Massimiliano Gioni and artist Laurie Anderson, among others.

Young, Gifted, and Black: Transforming Visual Media Curated by Shanté Cozier and Dionne Lee November 8 — December 15, 2012 Vague Storytelling Curated by Leslie Grant & Grant Willing September 14 — October 27, 2012 The 2012 Annual Juried Exhibition Jurors: Elisabeth Biondi & Martine Fougeron August 16 — September 8, 2012

The Hopper Prize is a grant - making institution and exhibition platform offering a series of individual artist grants totaling $ 5,000.00 USD administered through an open call juried by leading curators.

Since 2015, WaveMaker has awarded more than forty grants to creatives across Miami - Dade County through a juried process supporting projects that are non-commercial, non-institutional, stimulate critical thinking and dialogue, and expose audiences to innovative artistic practices typically under - recognized by traditional venues.

In this case acceptance is granted by the Künstlerhaus Bethanien on the basis of a review by an in - house jury.

In texts and illustrations, CyberArts 2005 documents works selected by an international jury as the best entries in the categories of Computer Animation / Visual Effects, Digital Music, Interactive Art, Net Vision and Digital Communities, plus the winners of «u10: freestyle computing,» a national youth competition, and the Art and Technology grant program.

WORKS ON PAPER: SOUTHWEST 1978 INVITATIONAL CARLOTTA CORPRON DAN RIZZIE CAROLE SCHOLDER SELECTED BY ROBERT M. MURDOCK, CURATOR OF CONTEMPORARY ART JURIED WESTON NAEF, THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART, NEW YORK, JUROR DALLAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS OCTOBER 25 THROUGH NOVEMBER 26, 1978 Exhibition and tour organized by the Dallas Museum of Fine Arts with the aid of a grant from Mobil Foundation, IncBY ROBERT M. MURDOCK, CURATOR OF CONTEMPORARY ART JURIED WESTON NAEF, THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART, NEW YORK, JUROR DALLAS MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS OCTOBER 25 THROUGH NOVEMBER 26, 1978 Exhibition and tour organized by the Dallas Museum of Fine Arts with the aid of a grant from Mobil Foundation, Incby the Dallas Museum of Fine Arts with the aid of a grant from Mobil Foundation, Inc..

All awards were granted by the Festival jury, composed of guest curators and representatives of the residency programs.

Cuccinelli, who believes the jury is still out on whether climate change is caused by human activity, has said he is investigating whether Mann defrauded taxpayers when seeking state grant money for his research.

Finding that the defense would be unjustly prejudiced by allowing the case to proceed toward a jury trial without permitting the defendant's expert to examine the plaintiff as the plaintiff's own expert had, the appellate court granted the writ of mandamus, forcing the lower court to honor the defendant's request.

CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, and because no issue of material fact exists for determination by a jury, it is axiomatic that summary judgment for Defendant should be granted.

Though I won't credit all my whining about the need for the Supreme Court to start addressing all the important issues left unresolved by Blakely and Booker (see, e.g., here and here), I will celebrate the big news coming from Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog that the Court today granted cert in «a significant sequel to its series of rulings on the roles of judges and juries in criminal sentencing» by accepting for review «the issue of whether a violation of the jury's role in sentencing can ever be excused as «harmless error.»»

In the rules governing grand juries, the prosecutor is allowed to be present and to speak, but has no official controlling role, other than whatever leadership is granted by the foreman.

How this will be interpreted by the Ontario Courts is anyone's guess but likely it will be used to grant discretion to the Tribunal, Judge or Jury on whether two similar jobs are «substantially the same».

The substantial success of the plaintiff is clearly demonstrated by the large amount of damages awarded, the finding by the jury that the defendant acted maliciously and the total injunctive relief being granted.»

Following Harding's closing arguments to a jury in the 13 - day trial, the ICBC moved for a mistrial, which was granted on April 30 by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Peter Voith.

(Order, p. 2) As the court notes in its summary of the order, an acquittal can issue either when a jury returns a not - guilty verdict, or «when a trial court grants a defendant's new trial motion for evidentiary insufficiency... or dismisses a case... for evidentiary insufficiency» (Id., pp. 2 — 3) The essence of the court's decision is in two parts: (1) The new trial motion should not have been granted because there was sufficient evidence to convict Mr. Stern on counts of conspiracy; and (2) Because the trial court did not rule on the majority of the issues raised in Stern's motion for a new trial, those issues have yet to be decided, and should be addressed on remand by the court of appeals.

If this motion was granted the punishing effect would in essence leave the Plaintiff with $ 0 as the costs consequences would eat up almost the entire $ 52,700 awarded by the Jury.

A summary judgment motion, if granted by a judge, removes a case from the province of the jury.

BASF appealed on three questions: whether the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict to the plaintiff on a statute of limitations defense, whether the plaintiff showed sufficient proof that diacetyl provided by BASF caused his injuries, and whether the court improperly instructed the jury about BASF's duty to warn of diacetyl's hazards.

Mr. Grant was convicted by judge and jury of one count of second ‑ degree murder.

The following sections came into force on 8 January 2007 provided that committal, transfer or service of evidence in a sending case takes place on or after that date: (i) sections 17 to 21 (trial by jury of sample counts only); (ii) section 30 (prosecution appeals); and (iii) section 56 (grants for assisting victims, witnesses, etc).

● How Jury Nullification Is Typically Misunderstood by Lawyers and Judges by Paul Grant, Attorney at Law and FIJA Advisory Board member

And be it further enacted, That all the said courts of the United States shall have power to grant new trials, in cases where there has been a trial by jury for reasons for which new trials have usually been granted in the courts of law; and shall have power to impose and administer all necessary oaths or affirmations, and to punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all contempts of authority in any cause or hearing before the same; and to make and establish all necessary rules for the orderly conducting business in the said courts, provided such rules are not repugnant to the laws of the United States.

After evidence is presented and decisions rendered, jury decisions are reviewed by additional peers to grant rewards for good judgement, while potentially applying a penalty to those who vote against the winning decision, providing incentives for the entire system to push towards the fairest outcome.