Sentences with phrase «granted summary judgment for»

The court granted summary judgment for the town, as it found that the «housing for older persons» exemption precluded a claim of familial - status discrimination.

The district court granted summary judgment for WDA, and Vande Zande appealed.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the broker, finding that the broker had no notice of any defect on the diving board.

Because the relationship fell within the affiliated business relationship exception, the court granted summary judgment for Borders & Borders.

Thus, the court granted summary judgment for AMCH.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the sellers and sellers» representative, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal.

After truncated discovery, the District Court granted summary judgment for Kodak.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario reversed the decision of the motion judge and granted summary judgment for rescission in favour of the franchisee purchaser, Mendoza, based on the disclosure deficiencies in AGR's disclosure document.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.

The District Court granted summary judgment for 2 Live Crew, holding that its song was a parody that made fair use of the original song.

The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, holding that the memorial crosses did not violate the federal or state constitution.

The Court granted summary judgment for the Defendants as to all Counts of Plaintiff's Complaint.

The Richmond U.S. District Court grants summary judgment for grocery store against a customer who allegedly slipped on a smashed grape on Saturday morning; customer could not prove actual or constructive knowledge of an unsafe condition when the employee responsible...

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's order granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs, and denying summary judgment for the defendants, in a dispute over insurance coverage.

Not exact matches

«Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Sulyma had actual knowledge of the facts comprising claims I and III, as well as knowledge of the disclosures he alleges were unlawfully inadequate in claims II and IV, the Court grants defendants» motion for summary judgment on those claims, finding them time - barred,» Cousins wrote in his opinion.

For instance, the judge granted summary judgment against the NCAA on its argument that scholarship rules «improve [e] the quality of the collegiate experience for student - athletes, other students, and alumni by maintaining the unique heritage and traditions of college athletics and preserving amateurism as a foundational principle, thereby distinguishing amateur college athletics from professional sports, allowing the former to exist as a distinct form of athletic rivalry and as an essential component of a comprehensive college education.&raqFor instance, the judge granted summary judgment against the NCAA on its argument that scholarship rules «improve [e] the quality of the collegiate experience for student - athletes, other students, and alumni by maintaining the unique heritage and traditions of college athletics and preserving amateurism as a foundational principle, thereby distinguishing amateur college athletics from professional sports, allowing the former to exist as a distinct form of athletic rivalry and as an essential component of a comprehensive college education.&raqfor student - athletes, other students, and alumni by maintaining the unique heritage and traditions of college athletics and preserving amateurism as a foundational principle, thereby distinguishing amateur college athletics from professional sports, allowing the former to exist as a distinct form of athletic rivalry and as an essential component of a comprehensive college education.»

Judge Elaine Slobod, of Orange County Supreme Court in upstate New York, granted partial summary judgment March 12 for Wah - chung Hsu, who once lived in the hamlet of Highland Mills, saying in court documents that Wyckoff was in breach of contract when it did not pay him severance after firing him.

In one case, Denenberg allegedly prepared a «fake order» in which the court granted his client a motion for summary judgment, dismissing a claim against it with prejudice, the suit said.

«The state Supreme Court had already granted our request for summary judgment determining that Trump and his University are liable for operating illegally in New York as an unlicensed educational institution.»

(d) Intentional infliction of emotional distress The court granted the district's motion but denied the individual defendants» motion for summary judgment for this claim because of the boundaries of the state's governmental immunity legislation.

(c) Violation of 14th Amendment procedural due process The court granted the defendants» motion for summary judgment for this claim, finding that Ms. I did not meet the applicable precedent, which requires at the threshold an allegation that the reason for the forced discharge was to avoid a pre-termination hearing.

It granted the DOE's motion for summary judgment.

After expedited discovery, the court granted the issuer's motion for summary judgment in all respects, permitting the bond issuance to proceed.

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc., Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., Ubisoft Inc., and Nintendo of America Inc.'s (collectively «Defendants») on Plaintiff Richard J. Baker's («Baker») claims for infringement pursuant to the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS» MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 20for infringement pursuant to the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS» MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 20FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 2017.

Causing heartburn for project applicants developing on tribal land, the Tenth Circuit reversed the District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma's grant of summary judgment and determined that the defendants» large - scale excavation project, involving site modification and the use of excavated rock and soil in the installation of wind turbines, constituted «mining» under federal regulations addressing mineral development on Native... Complete story»

It examines activity for five judges over the past five years, showing the percentage of cases in which each judge granted or denied summary judgment motions and the average days it takes each judge to decide a case.

Thus, regarding the claim for negligent breach of fiduciary duty, the Superior Court grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants was reversed.

Represented Braintree Laboratories at the Federal Circuit to reverse a district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement for Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, following a patent dispute concerning Breckenridge's planned generic version of Braintree's SUPREP laxative drug.

Arden Engineering filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial level judge granted.

Ms. Deluhery persuaded the court to overturn summary judgment for a law firm and grant summary judgment to her client which had sued for legal malpractice.

After filing the second case, the family asked the court to grant a motion for partial summary judgment against State Farm.

CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, and because no issue of material fact exists for determination by a jury, it is axiomatic that summary judgment for Defendant should be grantFor the reasons set forth above, and because no issue of material fact exists for determination by a jury, it is axiomatic that summary judgment for Defendant should be grantfor determination by a jury, it is axiomatic that summary judgment for Defendant should be grantfor Defendant should be granted.

The trial court granted the University's request for summary judgment and dismissed the professor's claims.

In the absence of expert testimony, there was no triable issue of material fact as to whether a defect in the speed control deactivation switch installed on a pickup truck was the proximate cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions for summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.).

The Court of Appeal held that Warkentin, J., in granting summary judgment to the second lawyer, erred in failing to consider whether he had owed the plaintiffs a duty to advise them about the limitation period for suing the first lawyer, even though the written retainer between the plaintiffs and the second lawyer was restricted to an assessment of the first lawyer's account.

By order dated July 14, 2014, the motion judge, the Honourable Justice Martin S. James of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, granted Mr. Arnone's motion for summary judgment and ordered Best Theratronics to pay (i) damages equal to the gross amount of the salary Arnone would have earned until he qualified for an unreduced pension, less payments made to him to satisfy the statutory obligations of the employer, (ii) $ 65,000 representing the present value of the loss of an unreduced pension, (iii) a retirement allowance equal to 30 weeks» pay, and (iv) costs totaling $ 52,280.09.

For example, if some of the claims against some of the parties will proceed to trial in any event, it may not be in the interest of justice to use the new fact - finding powers to grant summary judgment against a single defendant.

17 As a result of this asymmetry, the court that makes the most authoritative pronouncements on the standard for granting summary judgment — the Court of Appeal — tends to do so in cases where the motions court has denied the complainant her day in court.

Finding that Veoh qualifies for protection under the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz granted summary judgment dismissing Universal's suit.

Judge Reiss granted the defendants» motion for summary judgment, finding that «the only reasonable interpretation of that language is that it requires Killington Ltd. to provide the designated passholder free use of all ski lifts operated by Killington Ltd. at the Killington Ski Area so long as it operates in that area... «The term corporation, she wrote, «clearly refers to the named corporations, Sherburne and Killington Ltd.» and «reveals no intention to bind Killington Ltd's successors... To the contrary, Killington Ltd.'s obligations under the passes clearly terminate with its cessation of operations in the area.»

A Superior Court judge granted the defendants» motion for summary judgment ruling that plaintiff's claims were preempted by Federal statute and safety regulations promulgated thereunder.

In this slip and fall action, the trial court granted Appellee Wal - Mart's motion for summary judgment based on the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact that Wal - Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition.In this slip and fall action, the trial court granted Appellee Wal - Mart's motion for summary judgment based on the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact that Wal - Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition.

As a result, the court reversed the granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, explaining that the plaintiff would need to file a personal injury lawsuit to establish the insurance company's liability for her future medical expenses.

On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that it was an error for the court to dismiss their defect and negligence claims because the only grounds to grant the motion for summary judgment relied on the trial court granting the defendant's request to exclude the expert's testimony.

Answer: Judge Carton says your motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

The trial court ultimately granted summary judgment in Defendants» favor as to all claims resulting in a complete defense for the clients.

21st Century then moved for summary judgment because its policy contained a «Named Driver Exclusion Endorsement» that excluded Roberson from all coverage under the policy; the trial court agreed and granted 21st Century's motion.

Subsequently summary judgment was granted for our client.

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which the court granted in full.