Granted, you only have to figure it out once, and
owners will learn their cars, but the division
of labor between the two menu
systems doesn't make total sense.
«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples
of the types
of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement
of the decisions
of adjudicators under the Housing
Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development
of land or the construction
of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation
of computers, computer software and related network
systems; (f) claims relating to the quality
of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach
of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours,
owners and occupiers
of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out
of fires; (k) claims involving taking
of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions
of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»
Time and attention needs to be given to ensuring traditional
owners understand their rights and interests within the native title
system, such as procedural rights to comment on or object to future act processes under the future act regime, the right to negotiate in relation to the
grant of mining permits, the exercise
of native title rights, and the right to protect such rights from breach through common law remedies.