The Supreme Court came up with a hackneyed opinion in Citizens United that
grants free speech rights to non-human beings.
For precisely the same reasons that I found your statement to be laughable, the government must insure that mechanisms are put in place to insure that the actual persons
granted free speech rights by the Supreme Court (the owners of the corporations) are the ones actually exercising their new rights instead of having those rights stolen by fat - cat executives and self - appointed boards.
Not exact matches
The We the People Amendment is the only amendment that deals with both Supreme Court doctrines that
grant constitutional
rights to artificial entities and that define spending money as
free speech.
«What we are witnessing in New York is Huxley's [sic] «Big Brother» in the flesh...
Free political
speech and association lies at the heart of the American experiment; the state must not be
granted the
right to monitor routine political activities and associations that pose no security threat.»
Legal Simon Jones has commentary on the defeat this week of a controversial bill in the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly to tighten regulations on the sexual depictions of minors in manga, anime and video games: «This is a social battle waged in legislature, and the ultimate goal is to once again push adult content back into the darkest recesses of society, by getting people accustomed to the idea of
granting rights to fictional characters, and eroding the
rights of real people to have
free and unpleasant
speech.
On Wednesday, the FDA campaign may have died out altogether, as U.S. District Judge Richard Leon
granted summary judgment in favor of five tobacco companies who objected that the proposed warnings would violate their
free speech rights, cost millions of dollars to print and require them to feature anti-smoking advocacy more prominently than their own brands.