The quest for private donations without public financing can not match the overwhelming power of the small amounts needed to qualify for huge
grants of taxpayer money.
Not exact matches
Hi Amy - I wish I could offer free services, but my small business is not supported by
taxpayers or
grant money of any kind.
Tenney says the $ 15 million gondola planned for the New York State Fair is an unnecessary waste
of taxpayers»
money, and she'll oppose
granting the federal approval needed for the project.
The governor has said he'd prefer to set up a separate source
of funding, not from
taxpayer money, to pay for a matching
grant system.
So, in 2005, Silver awarded Taub's research center a $ 250,000 research
grant from an $ 8.5 million pool
of taxpayer money established by the state Health Care Reform Act — which was disbursed at the speaker's sole discretion with no public disclosure, court papers state.
The Mayor also proposed a plan for City Council to
grant the city the power to sell Emergency Repair Program liens that exist on a property to a third party collector (see video above), who would then be in charge
of collecting on the debt — saving
taxpayer money from footing the bills for emergency repairs and possibly giving landlords more incentive to make repairs themselves.
Officials at local agencies receiving the
grant money said that the funds paid for crime - fighting activities that would otherwise come from local
taxpayers or, in this era
of tightening budgets, not be funded at all.
Kennedy, as did his opponent in 2014, signed a contract promising to limit campaign spending to a
grant of about $ 95,000 in
taxpayer money he received under the Citizen Election Program (CEP), the landmark Connecticut campaign finance reform that its supporters claim is a model for keeping special interest
money out
of elections.
That year the pool
of taxpayer money Silver used for the
grants was eliminated, according to papers.
Under the state's Citizens» Election Program, gubernatorial candidates need to raise a quarter
of a million dollars in donations
of $ 100 or less with 90 percent
of the
money coming from Connecticut residents to receive millions in
taxpayer - financed election
grants.
Campaigners fighting to get their MPs to resign immediately - and spare
taxpayers the cost
of the resettlement
grant - would not necessarily save
money though.
• The Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Select Committee in the House
of Commons should monitor and report on higher education funding and provision each year, assessing the impact
of changes on disadvantaged students, as well as mature and part - timers; • Better co-ordination between higher education ministers from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to rationalise student funding policies across the UK; • An investigation by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) into the impact
of the latest changes to
grants and loans, to ensure value for
money for students and
taxpayers; • Stronger evaluation
of university spending
of # 750m a year on outreach and access programmes to maximise their impact.
House Bill 1637 diverts
taxpayer money to private and religious schools with no accountability or oversight, a clear violation
of the New Hampshire Constitution, which states, `... no
money raised by taxation shall ever be
granted or applied for the use
of the schools
of institutions
of any religious sect or denomination.»
I had to file a Freedom
of Information request in order to get a copy
of the paperwork on the Gates
grant and what I received was only the partial information, because as Connecticut
taxpayers will have learned from the Jumoke / FUSE fiasco, while charter schools consistently argue they are «public» when it comes to accepting
money from the state, they are quick to claim that they are private institutions when it comes to transparency and accountability.
«Through government
grants,
taxpayers are footing a large part
of this scheme's annual # 4m [US$ 7m] budget and they have a right to know their
money isn't being spent greenwashing bad practice,» continued Picken.
The global warming pushers are well - funded because they have something to gain — billions
of illicit dollars in
grant money from the
taxpayers, sale
of «carbon credits,» book, TV and film deals and more.
The duplicity and hypocrisy
of environmental pressure groups seem to be matched only by their consummate skill at manipulating public opinion, amassing political power, securing
taxpayer - funded government
grants, and persuading people to send them
money and invest in «ethical» stock funds.
We know that an inordinate amount
of taxpayer and consumer
money has been poured into these industries and it would be quite sad if more
grants, subsidies, cheap loans or bail outs were given to them.
Ball, a long - retired geographer who is more famous for overstating his own credentials than for anything accomplished during his academic career, had accused Weaver (then a lead author for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
of bias and scientific incompetence — casting him as part
of a politicized campaign to fleece Canadian
taxpayers of grant money while overselling the dangers
of climate change.
The UK tried that earlier with the PV
grants system in the Low Carbon Building programme — but the level
of demand for
grants was such that it overwhelmed the relatively small scheme, and there were limits to how much more
taxpayers money the government felt it could provide.