Sentences with phrase «graph above does»

Now, the debt - to - GDP graph above doesn't take into account pension and entitlement underfunding / non-funding.

Not exact matches

It does this by giving us an answer in the form of an «Information Card» taken from its Knowledge Graph and displaying it right at the top of the results page either above or to the right (sometimes both).

The phrase «long tail» is a visual metaphor for the shape of a distribution graph (we promised a dragon above and don't worry, it's coming):

As the graph above shows, despite everything they have done so far, we are on a clear course to extreme global warming.

Studies of bariatric surgery show that metabolism does not drop as you can in the graph above..

In addition to all of the above, there is also a survey for students to take home and do with their families so they can include numeracy into this unit with data and graphing of results.

Yes, that «What Advantages Do Traditional Publishers Offer Authors» title on the graph of that MB / GC article I linked to above apparently came directly from DBW / WD's survey.

As I said above, I don't anticipate that the eBook graph line will spike again, as it did a few years ago, until we see a truly unique, high - level enhancement hit the market.

In the graph above, showing the truth of author earnings, not publishers, we see the reality of what going Indie can do for you.

I did the second graph in order to make the point that nations with fertility below 1.76 in 2010 tended to increase their fertility, while those above 1.76 tended to decrease it.

On reflection, i suspect then that the above graph doesn't just capture mean - reversion in CAPE, but also mean reversion in the other factors contributing to total return — inflation, dividends, and growth rates.

Hello I'm trying to rebuild my credit and I have my online school that I paid off and on both experian and equifax it states paid and then on transunion it says «automated accounts» I didn't see this on the above graph so I'd thought I'll ask you.

Not only does the calculator have a graph that updates dynamically, but it also includes advanced reports branded with your photo, company, name, and contact info from your Zillow profile (see screenshot, above).

Whenever the green graph is above the orange one, like in the example above, you simply just have to stop micro-managing your trades and believe in yoru first analysis and let price do its thing.

But since that did not actually happen (as evidenced by the graph above), her conclusion does not logically follow.

A strange temperature graph Veizer publishes the above graph to suggest that temperature and CO2 concentration do not look alike, hence CO2 has not caused the warming.

Note above how all of the NASA graphs show renewed warming starting around 1967, yet that warming does not appear in the NCAR graph.

Okay: http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ — Also if you want to argue that it says «catastrophic» — that also says that scientists believe in global warming and the word «catastrophic» is relative — that means this point is completely subjective to whatever — it just says that 3 % believes in catastrophic change — and i said above that «catastrophic» is relative 8) https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm — you can say it produces more but it absorbs the co2 back through photosynthesis — our industrial system doesn't reclaim the co2 it produces so it results in a buildup in co2 9) http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ — look at the graph 10) I mean kind of but how do they profit?

Does the graph displayed by maksimovich1 above display differently colored distinct «regimes» or differently colored distinct «excursions»?

As suggested in the above graph (which the reader is very encouraged to click on and click to enlarge if it does not display full size at first):

That 1999 graph pictured above for the cover of the WMO 50th anniversary report is «absolutely nothing to do with Dr Mann».

Doomsday predictions that do not comport with any known climate reality on Earth (again, view above graphs).

Edim, just because it can't be seen above the background noise on those graphs doesn't mean it wasn't there earlier.

oceanic temperatures in the summer were as high as +.37 c (often) above normal on this graph which does not go back that far.

According to the Global Land - Ocean Temperature Index graph that you showed above that is not true, perhaps you don't know what «unabated» means?

The original Usoskin graph did not have the green line or green filled areas, but suggested Grand Minima only occurred under the blue line, the area above the red line is considered grand maxima by Usoskin.

I did a numerical integration of the graph above, and found that they have 2.8 times as much area with 2010 warmer than they do with 2010 cooler.

You'll notice when you do so that his rule has really roused the wrath of the skeptics, not surprising given the evident differences between the above two graphs.

Note the graph linked above has the phases labelled «PDO phases» because that is what they appeared to map to when I did the graph in late 2009, but their line segments are derived purely from the phases in the temperatures and not from any PDO data.

The Senator does not mention what we should do to combat climate change and ocean acidification if we were to drop wind power, nor does he mention that wind power in Australia has been very effective in reducing carbon dioxide emissions intensity (see the graph on the right above).

A little ammendment to my explanation above: the x axis in these graphs does not represent 0.

Sadly, Prof. Salby's presentation did not include nearly enough information to reproduce the graphs shown above, so I will explain the flaw in his reasoning first via a simple thought experiment, and then illustrate the mainstream understanding of this issue, that is based on the correlation between the annual growth rate and the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which was first mentioned in the peer reviewed literature way back in 1979.

As noted above, the language is straightforward, and though the graphs and charts are both apt and informative, they do not attempt to excite.

The second graph would reflect the plan that does not include the severe deprivations over and above the technology upgrades.

The graph in the post above does indeed show the trend 1979 - 97 of 0.13 °C / decade.

Bitcoin price action aside, the above graphs confirms that looking at the number of daily transactions alone does not give the full picture of the extent to which bitcoin is being used.

Did you notice in the above graph I mentioned, «Physically and temperamentally fit ``.

Looking at the graph above, the number of homes sold peaked in 2005 and then started to tank, but nationally prices didn't start to fall until 2 years later.