Sentences with phrase «graph above says»

The graph above says it all: In 2002, for every employee laid off from a company with employee stock ownership, 3.1 employees were laid off from conventionally - owned companies.

Not exact matches

The new three - cylinder engine uses the single mono - scroll turbo; BMW says that the torque response of a mono - scroll turbo on the new engine closely matches the response of a four - cylinder twin scroll turbo, in fact bettering it very slightly, as you can see in the graph above.

As I said above, I don't anticipate that the eBook graph line will spike again, as it did a few years ago, until we see a truly unique, high - level enhancement hit the market.

Lets say they take the premiums in the above graph for a period of 5 years.

Hello I'm trying to rebuild my credit and I have my online school that I paid off and on both experian and equifax it states paid and then on transunion it says «automated accounts» I didn't see this on the above graph so I'd thought I'll ask you.

With the above said, the earnings and price correlated graph on Silver Wheaton reveals some fascinating correlations and relationships.

Also I wanted to say, King Art, thank you for your transparency in showing things like the Steam Greenlight graphs, and the results of the poll above.

All this was shared by Satoru Iwata at Nintendo's finacial meeting (which you can see the graph for above) he had this to say:

If you fix it at say 0.25 degrees below the 1951 — 1980 mean, that would be a «best estimate» of pre-industrial temperature and will standardise the graphs, improve communication and reduce confusion, eg «Scientist estimate the world's temperature in 2016 was 1.2 °C above per - industrial times.

Before someone is going to say something like Hadley is different than GISStemp etc, My work agrees indirectly with GISStemp, and above all other reasons, a Density Weighted Temperature of the entire atmosphere would make such surface temperature graphs or projections eventually obsolete.

If you look at more recent data since 2010, say this Colorado graph, you will see the blue wiggles start mainly below the linear trend line and by 2006 have become above the trend line.

Look at the data for 1987 in the first graph produced by SteveMc above, how can you say the upward trend was well established in 1987?

As the graph reappeared in the above updated form in the new Royal Society climate updates report we thought we should take another good look at it, and this time asked Mark Urban if during the busy end of the academic semester he could spare some time to personally help us better understand what it says and what it means.

Okay: http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ — Also if you want to argue that it says «catastrophic» — that also says that scientists believe in global warming and the word «catastrophic» is relative — that means this point is completely subjective to whatever — it just says that 3 % believes in catastrophic change — and i said above that «catastrophic» is relative 8) https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm — you can say it produces more but it absorbs the co2 back through photosynthesis — our industrial system doesn't reclaim the co2 it produces so it results in a buildup in co2 9) http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ — look at the graph 10) I mean kind of but how do they profit?

All I can say to them is look at that graph above.

Girma March 17, 2012 at 5:37 am said: Vaughan Pratt, Are they CLIMATE TURNING POINTS that we see in the above graph in the 1880s and 1910s?

izen says: July 21, 2013 at 9:34 am «Checking just one of the graphs above with the data shows a conflict with UAH.

The amplitude of temperature in the first half of the graph otherwise (1850 - 2000, say 1925)-- let us call it «status quo» for now — never rises above -02.

It says China's peak emissions are likely to «lie far above a two degrees consistent emission pathway», as this graph shows:

Lets say they take the premiums in the above graph for a period of 5 years.

New homes are priced above average resales, as you say (and as the 2nd graph shows), and so you're right to point out that this logically equates to higher incomes for buyers of new homes.