Sentences with phrase «graph for»

Click on the graph for additional [more]

See the graph for the most common mobile job search activities:

See the graph for the average incomes in the states with the most respondents.

Check out the nifty bar graph for your skills and language sections.

Use the artfully - crafted bar graph for your skills and language sections.

The Fitbit Today app now shows more information than ever, including your three most recent workouts, a 7 - day graph for your primary goal (such as steps, calories, etc.), and your resting heart - rate for the past week.

You can also tap on the new battery icon near the top of the page to view the classic graph for your battery usage, but there's currently no way for seeing this on the main Battery page or viewing a history of the graph like you could in Nougat.

Bitcoin Price graph for the past 6 months — impressive growth for this new Store of Value.

The graph for the Huawei Mate 9 tells a similar story to that of the other two, but with an additional twist, here the cyan and magenta lines actually curve!

A sunrise and sunset feature alerts you an hour before sun up or sun down, and a tide graph for fishermen and boaters will tell you what the water level will be at certain times, as well.

Texture graph for the Vivo X20 Plus shows excellent detail preservation for static scenes in most lighting conditions and for motion scenes in very bright light.

Nick Colas stated on Wednesday that he had been following the bitcoin price graph for the last four years and he feels that 2018 will experience greater volatility in the background of Bitcoin soaring past 1600 % in the current year.

Which is when they originally launched Facebook Platform, allowing third party developers to tap into the social graph for the first time.

Alexa is clearly using its own knowledge graph for «Commerce» and «Command» where it handily outperforms Cortana.

If you switch to Summary, you'll see an overview of your backlink stats: the number of your backlinks and referring domains, a progress graph for your link profile's growth, a map of your links, anchor text stats, and your most linked - to pages.

It tells you how many steps you've taken, how many feet of elevation you've gained, how many times you've stood up, how long you've spent standing, how much time you've spent in different heart rate zones, how many calories you've burned, and even your resting heart rate for the day (and a graph for viewing all the spikes and valleys over the last six hours).

You can view your heart rate graph for the last 6 hours.

Lets say they take the premiums in the above graph for a period of 5 years.

In the recent BBC «Horizon» tv programme, Jones explained quite matter - of - factly to Sir Paul Nurse how he changed the graph for the WMO99 report to suit the advocacy needs of the WMO.

Jan — thank you for producing an up - to - date OHC graph for relevant layers.

In answer to R. Gates, I did not state in my posting that the CO2 concentration graph for the past ten years was «linear»: merely that it was «very close to linear».

It might be fair to criticise the WMO graph for not making proper reference to the scientific literature, but there's a a gulf of difference between criticism and the base and ugly efforts to smear legitimate research and scientific endeavor in the public eye.

Look at this graph for some perspective on that, also here.

If you need a nice graph for explaining this to someone see: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-cosub2sub-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter.html

This also limits the utility of the attribution graph for explaining the NH - SH series a bit.

How could you talk about climate change and not show a temperature graph for OZ or the MDB.

The total number of 1990 - 2004 cat 4 - 5s in the table matches the number shown in the graph for the three five - year periods from 1990 - 2004.

Over at WUWT, Monckton has explained more clearly how he gets his predicted CO2 graph for the A2 scenario and one of the commenters there has identified the problem (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/14/monckton-why-current-trends-are-not-alarming/#comment-459457): Monckton basically fit the CO2 concentration to an exponential function, using the actual value for concentration in 2000 and the «central value» for the A2 scenario of 836ppm in 2100.

Just look at a graph for the Holocene period, where you can actually resolve a variation that is thicker than the sea level curve.

You can debate whether these causes are legitimate or not, but in a graph for policymakers it's not inappropriate to drop the data where you suspect it's contaminated and switch to data you think is more trustworthy.

«They were not falsifying data; they were trying to construct an understandable graph for those who were not experts in the field.

Therefore, the IPCC's practice in effect reserves the right to substitute any new graph for a published graph so long as the IPCC's statisticians find the change reasonable.

OK good old Wikipedia has a graph for water reflexivity.

However, let's have a look at the temperature graph for the US.

If you look at a graph for almost any day on Wind Farm Performance you will see a similar result; some days there will be more generation than others, but most wind farms generate some power most of the time.

Zeke posts an out of date weird baseline graph for the number with no number visible and gives gives a list of unnamed stations and says count them yourself.

Thats the old graph for USHCN version 1 that I was trying to update in my Figure 5.

The top graph is the GISS graph for the gridcell I used.

The top graph is the GISS graph for one gridcell to the east.

Figure 3 is from a 9 year period in the graph for example.

Why does the «battle of the graphs» show that old and outdated H.H. Lamb temperature graph for Europe, whereas the topic is on the incidence of bush fires in the west of the US (thus not even about temperature at all)?

I need to combine all the monthly, annual January, and June trends into one graph for both time periods and for anomalies and residuals.

Do you have a similar graph as the first graph for CET WINTER only.

Here's the graph for Central Canada from the Viau and Gajewski (2009) paper that I correctly referred to as a region with «no warming.»

Graph 2: For me, I would like to have an Earth velocity graph for just one single complete year.

4) Assuming Jones was referring to his graph for the WMO report, he did not do anything like what Mann did in his Nature article (MBH 98).

Looking at the bottom of the AR4 map, the graph for the entire globe shows a declining and then basically flat blue curve for natural forcings.

Because the graphs are not suitable for comparison of post 1990 changes in temperature, the original article included a graph for just that purpose:

Click graph for a full size view.

I noticed that you did not link the graph for La Jolla.