In some, the empty squares of
graph paper show through; the obsessiveness of coloring in the grids, coupled with the unrefined material, has a lovely, humanizing effect.
Not exact matches
The game's success also
shows how much has changed in gaming technology: the first three Super Mario games were all designed by hand, on
graph paper.
The
graph's caption claims that it
shows a «dose - dependent» effect on cell growth — the
paper's linchpin result — but the data clearly
show the opposite.
However, Marcott et al. do note in their
paper that the «uptick»
shown in the
graph is not statistically robust, as the median resolution of all data is 120 years.
It is my impression from reading the original
paper (which is also the
graph that Dr. Greger
showed in the video) that meat / fish increased «insulin to glucose ratio» higher than fruits and other carbs, not the actual insulin level (which was the other way around).
2) Since I think of nutritional ketosis as a tool in a tool box, Is there any research /
papers that quantify the ranges of NT and the associated time cost for getting back into NT once you're no longer in NT (nice
graphs that
show time since in NT vs the time to get back into NT).
Rhee and Fornia make a valid point that not all teachers enter the profession at age 25, and their
paper also includes the
graph below
showing the actual distribution of California teachers by the age at which they began teaching.
The
graphs below, a modified version of Figure 1 from the
paper,
shows the total contributions that will be made into the pension plan over a teacher's working career (the solid black line) versus the actual benefit teachers would receive at a given stage of their career (the black dotted line).
Give children pieces of large - block
graph paper or have them draw boxes to
show the number of letters in their names.
The
graph below comes from a
paper by Josh McGee and Marcus Winters and
shows the percentage of New York City teachers who stay in the classroom over the years and their corresponding pension wealth.
And the end of the green curve, where the Kindle rank is 200,000 and the
paper rank is 1,000,000, is an approximation, since the Kindle line should be approach asymptotic by the time it gets to 700,000, but I'd need another decade on the
graph to
show that.
This
graph shows the difference between yields on A2 / P2 commercial
paper and the 2 - year Treasury.
Beyond revealing the impetus behind Star Fox's majestic gates, Shigeru Miyamoto and Takashi Tezuka
showed another notable artifact of game history: the
graph paper - based design documents for Super Mario Bros..
The
show is filled with references to contemporary race relations in America, and one of the first works on display is a small, poignant drawing on
graph paper entitled An Unarmed Black Man.
In everyday life, lines supposedly give us «safety» and «orientation», indicate or
show us a direction, create connections and provide a basis — at least, we assume this to be so... And yes, as a matter of fact, in notebooks or on
graph paper, the lines are already there, and our (western) culture then prescribes the direction (from top left to lower right).
Albers is having something of a revival at the moment ---- an excellent solo exhibition of her work at the Guggenheim Bilbao has just ended, she featured last year in a group
show at MOMA and in a dual
show at Yale and, finally, two books by her were published towards the end of last year: a monumental reprint of her essay On Weaving and this exquisitely produced set of around eighty sketches on
graph paper, entitled Notebook 1970 - 80.
The catalogue cover for «Robert Smithson,» at the Whitney Museum of American Art,
shows some
graph paper on which Smithson scribbled a diagram of his various ideas and plans.
I thought he might be unhappy to see: — the adjustment (in the new
paper) losing the 1998 RSS high temp
shown in Zeke Hausfather's older
graph, so the «cooling trend» argument gets hurt, or — the newer
graph having one more recent data point than the older, so the «cooling trend» argument gets hurt, or — the newer
graph showing a shorter time span and so not
showing the lower temps in earlier decades, so the «cooling trend» argument gets hurt, or — the newer
graph isn't directly comparable to an older
graph he prefers to look at without thinking about the numbers along the side, or — I du n no.
I have one purely academic question relating procedures for
showing graphs of data accross different latitudes, like the ones you copy from Sherwood's
paper showing trends for different latitudes and heigths in a colourful grid.
[UPDATE 9/09: Mark Lauer, an independent risk analyst, has done a fascinating critique of the data crunching in the
paper, including animated
graphs showing a marked lack of an uptick in fertility.
In figure 7 of the
paper, he
shows a blizzard of
graphs, in which he uses an additional variable (aerosol forcing) to «tune» each of his three climate response functions to the historical data.
The blog of Patrick Frank's
paper that spammed denial space
shows a
graph of the surface temperature anomaly from 1880 to 2010 with gray vertical bars behind it representing Frank's computed ± 0.46 C uncertainty at each point.
The key
graph showing this is not from Matt's
paper but / / www.slideshare.net/Revkin/six-americas-study-of-climate-views» > from the first Six Americas report.
There are literally hundreds of studies, reconstructions, research
papers and
graphs of solar cycles, and the vast majority
show an increase in solar activity early last century, and a flat cycle after about 1970.
shows another
graph NOT in the original
paper (Stefan attributes this one again to Klaus Bitterman)...
Yes, that plot of TSI
showing that solar activity was the higher during the last half of the 20th century than at any time in the previous 4 centuries IS published science, from Lean's peer reviewed
papers and from the World Radiation Center, as the
graph states.
The
paper featured an emblematic
graph known as the «hockey - stick» that
showed temperature rise in the twentieth century was unprecedented in recent history.
It should not have been used for this
paper because the authors were clearly decrying the practice of inserting instrumental data onto proxy
graphs to conceal declining temperatures... and correctly noting that most proxy data
shows cooling after 1980.
The
graph showed that in the first eight years of the 21st century the Earth had cooled:... Karl's
paper appears to repeal the laws of thermodynamics.
When someone plots a
graph showing future development as part of a «poster» or
paper, it can be called an «extrapolation», a «projection», a «forecast» or a «prediction».
Graphs and maps on pages 18 and 19 of this
paper show the actual effect of urban corrections in the US.
Graphs and scientific data from peer - reviewed
papers are used to
show that man - made influences are actually only a very small part of Earth's climate.
So your retort is irrelevant, because Loehle's corrected
paper from which you refer,
shows an even warmer MWP and colder LIA than his original
paper, from which the
graph I linked was from.
This
graph from AR4
shows a comparison of outgoing SW from the AOGCMs against the satellite data — you can follow the referenced
papers from there.
A resent
paper by Lovejoy 2014 (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00382-014-2128-2)
shows the forcing from CO2 and the corresponding aerosols over the last 100 years
shown in this
graph http://oi62.tinypic.com/ixv2m8.
Mr. Watts, while you are presenting this new study by Melvin et al. as something that provides results which allegedly refute Mann's hockey stick you do not tell your audience here that the temperature reconstruction
shown in the
graph, explicitly mentioned by you here, in the Melvin et al
paper is done only for a region of Northern Scandinavia, unlike the temperature reconstruction in Mann et al., (1999), doi: 10.1029 / 1999GL900070, which was a reconstruction of the Northern Hemispheric temperature.
The
graph in the
paper shows significantly more warming that the data it claims to be.
Earlier this year, a
paper by Michael Mann - for years a leading light in the IPCC, and the author of the infamous «hockey stick
graph»
showing flat temperatures for 2,000 years until the recent dizzying increase - made an extraordinary admission: that, as his critics had always claimed, there had indeed been a» medieval warm period» around 1000 AD, when the world may well have been hotter than it is now.
In this
graph from the new
paper, gray shading
shows pollution levels forecast by different models if there were no clean - energy investment.
Jose's
paper included a very rough solar radius
graph which
showed some modulation but was difficult to draw from.
The
paper includes four
graphs (figure 2), each of which
shows a curve of rising funding level over time for a particular NIH research institute, and a curve
showing death rates from the diseases that each institute focuses on.
Of note is Philip Clarke's fabrication that I have written that Greenland represents «the whole of the Arctic», or that I didn't include a link to the Alekseev
paper (I clearly did), or that I removed the plot from the Alekseev
graph (I didn't — the
graph of the 1900 - 2013 reconstruction
shown in red is found in Connolly et al., 2017).
Hansen
shows the adjustments for both Phoenix and Tokyo in the
graphs in the 1999
paper.
Here's the
graph of Northern Canada from the
paper that Philip Clarke apparently believes
shows clear evidence of anthropogenic influences (see that little uptick at the end — we did that!)
The
graph appears exactly as
shown in the Connolly et al. (2017)
paper, which is clearly described on the bottom line of the
graph itself:
Swetnam himself had published
papers showing southwest forest fires were far larger and far more frequent between 1700 and 1900 as seen in his published
graph (Fig. 5 below)
We shall revert to the question of synchronicity and climate severity later in this
paper, but it can be seen that even Lamb's
graph demonstrated modern «hockey stick» characteristics (albeit it appears this data was later added by Dr Mann using CET) More intriguingly, Lamb
shows another and much more dramatic «hockey stick» just before the start of the 18th century - a period which seems to have aroused limited curiosity - and is the intended subject of a future article.
Professor Michael Mann, of Penn State University in the US, who led research that produced the famous «hockey stick»
graph showing how humans were dramatically increasing the Earth's temperature, told The Independent the new
paper appeared «sound and the conclusions quite defensible».
The
paper concluded that «current climate models are still quite poor at modelling past sea ice trends» after including a
graph showing a decline in sea ice starting at the beginning of the «satellite era» in 1979.