Sentences with phrase «graph posted at»

I'm not a climate scientist, just a lowly internal medicine physician, and I only saw the temperature / CO2 graph posted at an exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History in New York (in Nov. 2006) and I noticed that temperature led the CO2 increase and deduced that oceanic outgassing must be the cause.

Not exact matches

Dr. Pete at Moz wrote a fantastic post about the effect of SERP crowding for organic spots, due to features such as local listings, advertisements, the knowledge graph, rich snippets, etc..

Similarly, if we had written a blog post explaining the Google Knowledge Graph based off of just one news outlet's understanding of the change, we could easily pass along incorrect information, or at the very least not present the entire scope of the story.

As you can see in the results graph at the top of the post and the table below, this system has been consistently profitable over the past several years.

d) Graph showing higher frequency of γH2Ax foci / nuclei at 40 and 80 μM dose of Bleomycin post silencing in siTRF2 silenced cells compared to Scrambled transfected HCT - 116 cells (p < 0.05).

Take a look at the top results from the Hashimoto's Symptom Checklist I posted last fall on the graph down below.

Without re-working the math, I would guess that Dr. Fung adjusted the load data according to a constant weight of the items he graphed, instead of the «serving size» as reported on the site at the link you posted.

Falling test scores, and mediocre English Language performance have plagued Rockteship schools over the past year, as shown in graphs at the bottom of this post.

As of posting, the price per earning of the S&P 500 is standing at 20.57 compared to the mean of 15.57 as shown in the graph below.

The idea for these graphs came from similar ones posted at Jesse's Cafe Americain, though he was making a different point I don't necessarily agree with.)

They're aimed at folks in the pre-alpha, another weekend of which kick off earlier today — it's a nice chunk of backers, if the activity graph posted to Twitter earlier is any judge.

Take a good long look at the graph for this post.

Look at the graph in my post on what an «energy moon shot» would look like to see the effort and investment that went into the Apollo program and the war on cancer.

Rahmstorf added another RealClimate post today on a new graph created by his colleagues at the German KlimaLounge blog as a visual rebuttal to a graph created in 2009 by Anthony Watts, the online aggregator of anything questioning the significance of global warming:

Your chart shows the difference between the absolute temperature in 1895 as measured using the GISP2 ice core proxy, and the absolute temperature as measured at a nearby location using the thermometers in the 2000s, ie, the difference between the end of the GISP2 icecore and the higher of the two blue crosses in last graph in the original post.

But looking at the big picture shown in the graph I posted, I see quite few time periods where there were five or ten years of flat or declining temperatures (including several during the satellite era) very much like what we're seeing today.

The first two graphs at the start of this post are absolute proof that something is disturbing the Earth's external energy balance.

The graph on the right, which was from the data of the most recent full day available at the time I read the STT posting, shows that of the 27 wind farms logged by the Wind Farm Performance site, most were generating most of the day.

A graph we posted back in April shows the danger of looking at ENO to substantiate claims made about anthropogenic global warming.

When I look at the graph included in the posting, and visually remove 1998, it looks like a pretty consistent, and steady, upwards trend,

This graph was posted at realclimate along with the usual post hoc rationalisations.

You posted the NOAA tides and current graph for the entire record of the tide gauge at Marseille: 1.25 mm per yr.

But if you look at the reply to your original comment I've posted up a graph which agrees closely with his figure of 578 ppmv for CO2, under current trends, by the end of the century.

Look at my graphs (post # 33) do you really thing the last 1 000 years were like that?

In that respect, in my post to Roy (# 237) I meant to specifically reference the graph at the American Institute of Physics site (www.aip.org/history/climate).

The thing I find most interesting about your post, is that this is another way at looking at the same problem, namely where is the CO2 signal in the temperature / time graphs?

I'm looking at the graph at the top of this post which shows about 1 degree of change over the course of 130 + years.

My own theory, looking at the graph Hans posted, is that the closing of Panama took roughly 2 Myr (from 3 Myr to 1 Myr) to reach it's equilibrium climate response.

Rob Ellison, When one looks at the axis scales of the graphs you posted, it looks a lot more like the graphs were designed to manipulate a response than to inform thoughtful opinion.

From a brief examination of this graph and the post of Koonin at Curry's blog it appears that most of the similarity in speed of sea level rise Koonin claims is due to Koonin cherry picking the time period that was analized.

tallbloke (05:52:23): According to the Scotese et al graph posted by Anthony on the Hansen thread, the temperature was about 10C higher when the co2 level was at 8000ppm 550M years ago.

According to the Scotese et al graph posted by Anthony on the Hansen thread, the temperature was about 10C higher when the co2 level was at 8000ppm 550M years ago.

In several posts headed «Data tampering at USHCN / GISS», Goddard compares the currently published temperature graphs with those based only on temperatures measured at the time.

The graph was also posted by Joe Romm at Climate Progress and tweeted by Bill McKibben.

I was surprised at level of traffic at the non-subject from Dr. Rahmstorf; I posted a speculative graph on the 2nd day, despite being strongly disapproved of by dr. Steig, it had over 300 hits during following 2 - 3 days (many US and some European universities were well represented), sort of rate occasionally but not often, get at WUWT.

At 3.42 above I suggested that R Gates post an authoritative graph as it can't be cooling AND warming.

So I guess my response to where I found the graph is if it was still being posted at the GISS website I would have linked that;)

Seems to me that the anthropogenic warming indicated here depends on your confidence of the post 1950 warming as reported by Hadley, but if those results have been manipulated i.e. early 40's warming suppressed and post 1970 warming enhanced, as the graph would appear to show, then there has been no anthropogenic effect at all.

Is one answer for the USHCN to continuously publish a) the raw data, b) the filter algorythms used at different points in time so critics and supporters alike can replicate data being used in a particular graph, and c) post their latest and greatest «managed dataset» with graphics of their choosing.

As it turns out, however, if you look at the graph I posted above — despite imposing no restrictions on the profile — it turns out to have a relatively smooth shape.

I remember Spencers post at WUWT, at the time I thought the technique he used was rather «unique»; From memory, dividing population densitys into «buckets» and using a temperature avg within those buckets to produce some very regular (visually pleasing) graphs from some quite irregular data.

Looking at the error bars in the graph at the top of this post, you could even say that 2014 might have only been the 14th hottest in the last 17 years.

McKitrick assures readers at ClimateAudit.org that he was not informed by the newspaper that they were going to run with «Only by playing with data can scientists come up with the infamous «hockey stick» graph of global warming» I think we need to hear from the Financial Post that this was indeed the case.

Nick posts out of date graphs at Moyhu Wednesday, May 14, 2014 USHCN, adjustments, averages, getting it right.

A useful graph comparing the time series of different sea level rise analyses is provided by Klaus Bitterman in a post at RealClimate:

Try looking at the graphs of XRD in the Korttyjarva River post.

Last week I asked Bob Tisdale to take a hard look at potential correlations between the AMO and Arctic sea ice extent, and he rose to the challenge — Anthony Guest post by Bob Tisdale This post presents reference graphs and a discussion of the effects of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on Arctic sea ice...

Global Warming: NASA scientist Roy Spencer recently posted on his Web site some startling graphs produced by John Christy, his colleague at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

The Fasullo post at Climate Dialogue, on sensitivity and TCR includes a graph showing pentadal average ocean heat content, with a reference to a and b curves.

Using wood for trees, I posted the 120 month graph on the thread at Climate Etc..