Sentences with phrase «graphic health warnings»

The FDA told the court that the warnings were part of its effort to carry out the congressional mandate of the «The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act,» which requires larger and more visible graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and ads.
The FDA's campaign is the result of «The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act,» which requires larger and more visible graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and ads.
On its website, the FDA states that the new campaign is the result of «The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act,» which requires larger and more visible graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and ads.
The FDA previously explained that the new campaign is the result of «The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act,» which requires larger and more visible graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and ads.
It took three months for research agency GfK to find the right shade of awful to satisfy the Australian government, who wanted to start matching the color with graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging.
The government mandated that this color grace cigarette packs, along with grisly graphic health warnings — and the results have been impressive.
The US Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday unveiled proposals for new, larger graphic health warnings to appear on cigarette packs and advertisements, which once finalized will...
The nine graphic health warnings to appear on every pack of cigarettes in America, announced by the FDA, are fairly tame when compared to what some countries» authorities have introduced.
By then, tobacco companies will be required to display one of nine graphic health warnings on each pack, to comply with the Tobacco Control Act of 2009.
Those in favour of more stringent packaging laws are advocating not just for increased information on drinks labels, but also for toned - down packaging, similar to that of tobacco.As of 2016, tobacco products in the UK are required to have a standard, plain packaging with graphic health warnings and stripped of any strong branding.
Today, Australia's high court upheld a law requiring tobacco products, starting December 1, to have plain packaging without logos and bear graphic health warnings.
«Studies have shown that graphic antismoking media campaign advertisements can help encourage smokers to quit, though we found placing a single graphic health warning at the POS did not have the same effect.»
The addition of a single graphic health warning sign at the point of sale did not affect smokers» or recent quitters» urge to smoke or affect their tobacco purchases.
The study, published in the March issue of American Journal of Public Health, looked at the behaviors of more than 1,200 current adult smokers and recent quitters in a virtual convenience store in which tobacco products were openly visible, hidden behind a cabinet or hidden with a graphic health warning sign on display.
«Policies banning tobacco displays may deter adult smoking; graphic health warning sign at point of sale might not.»
Polices that ban tobacco product displays at point of sale may reduce adults smoking by deterring purchases, though a single graphic health warning sign at the POS may not, according to a study by researchers at RTI International and Tarheel Technologies.

Not exact matches

At the very least the government should wait until they are in a position to evaluate both the effect of plain packaging in Australia and the effects of British initiatives such as graphic tobacco health warnings and the imminent display ban.
«It is possible that at - risk adolescents responded to the graphic warning posters in a defensive manner, causing them to discount or downplay the health risks portrayed in the poster,» Shadel said.
This research supports another study reported by Medical News Today earlier this year, which found a combination of health warning graphics and text on cigarette packets increased knowledge about the dangers of smoking among young adults, compared with text - only warnings.
Overall, the researchers say their findings show graphic warnings are more effective than text - only warnings for getting consumers to consider the health risks of smoking.
Americans have been seeing health warnings on their cigarette packages since 1966; now many countries have full color, very graphic messages explaining the dangers of smoking.
Accordingly, the FDA has proposed «nine new textual warning statements accompanied by color graphics depicting the negative health consequences of smoking.»
Furthermore, at least 65 % of the pack must be covered with health warnings and the now familiar graphic images of the health consequences of smoking.
Its key messages were that, in similar numbers to non-Indigenous Australians, Indigenous Australians want to quit smoking, know about its harmful effects (via social marketing, graphic pack warnings, health advice etc), and most wish they had never started.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z