This income seeking behavior caused dividend stocks as a group to go from being unloved and undervalued to overvalued relative to the broader market, as shown in
this graph presented by Meb Faber.
From
the graph presented by Scripps Institute CO2 measured from ice cores had risen 20ppm by 1900 or 16 % of the CO2 rise to date.
My comment that we see what we want to see and hear what we want to hear was based on the graph i presented http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:1971/mean:4/every:4/to:2010/plot/gistemp/from:1971/to:1980/trend/plot/gistemp/from:1981/to:1990/trend/plot/gistemp/from:1991/to:2000/trend/plot/gistemp/from:2001/to:2010/trend which shows a flattening trend in the last quarter, though a steeper trend in the previous three quarters compared to
the graph presented by Vaughan http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:1970/mean:4/every:4/to:2010/plot/gistemp/from:1970/to:1980/trend/plot/gistemp/from:1980/to:1990/trend/plot/gistemp/from:1990/to:2000/trend/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2010/trend Not in any of my past short exchanges with Vaughan have I purposely «jerked him around» or accused him of anything untoward.
Not exact matches
A year ago I wrote about a
graph prepared
by EU economists and
presented by them at my Peking University central bank seminar.
One frequently cited bar
graph has been used to suggest, for the decade 1965 - 75, a severe diminution of seven mainline Protestant bodies
by contrast both with their gains in the preceding ten years and with the continuing growth of selected conservative churches (see Jackson W. Carroll et al., Religion in America, 1950 to the
Present [Harper & Row, 19791, p. 15) The gap in growth rates for 1965 - 75, as shown on that
graph, is more than 29 percentage points (an average loss in the oldline denominations of 8.9 per cent against average gains among the conservatives of 20.5 per cent) This is indeed a substantial difference, but it does not approach the difference in growth rates recorded for the same religious groups in the 1930s, when the discrepancy amounted to 62 percentage points.
«With this tool we have reached the same conclusions as those
presented in Nature
by researchers working on the modENCODE, but the enormous difference is that instead of seeing the information in hundreds of
graphs and figures like in modENCODE, we have achieved a single map,» explains Azorín.
The climate change «hockey stick» is a
graph first published in 1998
by Michael Mann et al. that attempted to reconstruct the mean surface temperature on the planet during the period A. D. 900 to the
present, using multiple proxies, such as tree rings, to measure temperatures before formal instrumentation was in use.
Pobst promised that
by release, an annotated version of the bar
graph would be
presented to the player after each level.
In order to avoid identifying individual school districts, we
present the ten school districts in the order of their average high - low - SES gap in the relevant
graph (denoted
by the orange circles); the school districts are consequently in different orders in each
graph.
Each proposition is followed
by a mini-essay, then
by a few well selected and nicely
presented charts,
graphs, tables, and maps that supply the supporting data.
Just to set the record straight, in Figure 2 we
present the correct
graph for Ohio — reproduced from our EFP article — and let the reader decide if «mountain» or «molehill» is an apt metaphor, and whether «peculiar» is an appropriate adjective for the incentives represented
by this
graph.
For the students to learn
by seeing / visualizing, they realized the need to
present social studies using maps,
graphs, and charts.
Judging
by the lack of STFT variation (in contrast to the first
graph where it does change), I'd guess that the DTC was
present but can't be sure.
Meb Faber supports this point
by presenting the historical performance of portfolios based on the «value» factor as compared to an example dividend investing portfolio, as shown in this
graph.
Tables are good at
presenting large amounts of data, but
graphs make the points more easily understandable and memorable, so let's bring this to life
by rearranging the data and
presenting it in Chart 2 in graphical form and continuing from our example.
Second,
present the
graph with a log scale so the hockey - stick effect is hidden and the portfolios» growth rates are represented
by the lines» slopes.
Although I've not yet completed the necessary due diligence that would make me comfortable enough to invest in any of these selections, based on the preliminary essential fundamentals at a glance
presented by each respective F.A.S.T.
Graph ™, they all appear to be fairly valued candidates worthy of the time and effort to do so.
The 60 hand - drawn charts,
graphs, and maps
presented as a part of his «Exhibit of American Negroes» at the World's Fair in Paris in 1900 have been digitized
by the Library of Congress.
Here are some reactions, including a
graph from my lectures showing what global C emissions would look like if all countries per capita emissions were shared globally, along the lines
presented by Andy:
I'd say hold up a GISS
graph by way of summary is emminently suitable for the medium in which it was
presented.
The problem with your statement is that 1) 1998 was a rather large outlier caused
by the strongest El Nino on record, meaning the underlying trend continued unperturbed right past 1998 until ~ 2002 in that
graph (the Mark I eyeball at work again), and 2) 2002 to
present (and even 1998 to
present) does not constitute the long term trend as 12 (or 17) years is far short of the ~ 30 * years needed to detect the underlying trend from the year to year noise of natural variability.
This was in response to a
graph by Roger Pielke Jr.
presented in the New York Times Tierney Lab Blog that compared observations to IPCC projections over an 8 - year period.
The Gregory et al (2013) Fig 1 data used
by L&C 2014
presents an intriguing result (
graphed two clicks down here.)
You have seen the overlay of the Moberg proxy data over the Marohasy proxy data and should have noticed that both are identical, except that the Moberg data needs to be scaled
by 10 % and shifted / stretched to the
present by 35 years to correctly «match» their
graph.
This is a
graph often
presented by skeptics.
A
graph developed
by Breslow and
presented by Committee Co-chair Senator Mike Barrett, sponsor of S. 1821, showed that existing policies will leave Massachusetts far from achieving the internationally - recognized standard of an 80 percent emissions reduction.
You may check this post, and also the discussion where further issues are brought up, and also links to the
graphs used
by Hammer are
presented.
This
graph is a derivative of satellite data as
presented by Dr. Roy Spencer.
Mr. Watts, while you are
presenting this new study
by Melvin et al. as something that provides results which allegedly refute Mann's hockey stick you do not tell your audience here that the temperature reconstruction shown in the
graph, explicitly mentioned
by you here, in the Melvin et al paper is done only for a region of Northern Scandinavia, unlike the temperature reconstruction in Mann et al., (1999), doi: 10.1029 / 1999GL900070, which was a reconstruction of the Northern Hemispheric temperature.
Each side, mostly from the extreme edges of the field, sling factoids at one another in endless streams of numbers,
graphs, trend - lines, echo - chamber talking - points (prepared
by their own side's experts)-- spiced with an truly incredible number and variety of personal opinions
presented as if they were facts.
1) The
graph was targeted
by climate naysayers as a suitable target for doubt — after all, the image it
presented was compelling.
Complaints included a 180 + page document (PDF) assembled
by numerous writers, scientists, and two former chairs of the IPCC that accused the program of «displaying erroneous or artificially manipulated
graphs, and
presenting incorrect, misleading, or incomplete opinions and facts on the science of global warming and the related economics.»
After suggesting Climate Scientist Myles Allen
presented a misleading
graph about CO2, and after receiving an admission from Oceanographer Gary Griggs that ice ages and other violent climate shifts, far greater than today's mild warming, can be caused
by natural forcings, Judge Alsup turned to the centrepiece of the conspiracy charge, the «Smoking Gun» memo.
More seriously, a casual inspection of both
graphs (normalized and non-normalized damage over time)
presented by Pielke leads me to question the statistical significance of either.
Last week I asked Bob Tisdale to take a hard look at potential correlations between the AMO and Arctic sea ice extent, and he rose to the challenge — Anthony Guest post
by Bob Tisdale This post
presents reference
graphs and a discussion of the effects of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on Arctic sea ice...
«The
graph we
presented illustrating the temperature plateau was not constructed
by the Sunday Politics but taken from a website, produced
by Phil Jones, a leading figure at the Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia»
Nic Lewis
presents a
graph of error in cloud cover predicted
by GCM's and satellite measurements of same.
The
present controversy, caused
by the IPCC's changes in published
graphs, is serving the purposes of the IPCC.
This
graph appears similar to one
presented by Roy Spencer in his written testimony before the US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee last July.
Dr. John Christy who is the most respected expert on global temperature was a lead author of the 2001 IPCC report who fought hard to prevent the MBH 98 Hockey stick
graph from being included in the 2001 TAR but his scientific claims were overruled
by political necessity and the defunct hockey stick was
presented half a dozen times in the 2001 report in spite of his objections on scientific grounds.
Nothing in the
graphs you've
presented (some tens of thousands of times all over the internet), overcoming all refutation
by packing up like a carpetbagger and changing your colors but not your shams, touches more than mere denial of patently obvious observable trends
by obfuscation and improper methodology.
The basic thesis
presented by No Tricks Zone is that these
graphs, which are inferred records of things like temperature and precipitation from specific localities through time, show that the climatological changes happening right now are neither dramatic nor man made...
I'd like to consolidate my earlier comment
by appending your
graph and
presenting again here and over at RealClimate and Tamino.
Once the testing process is finished, you're
presented with a bar
graph that shows the difference between «enhanced» audio levels — i.e., those tuned
by the Bolt's custom software — and untouched levels.
Once the testing process finishes, you're
presented with a bar
graph that shows the difference between «enhanced» audio levels — i.e., those tuned
by the Bolt's custom software — and unadjusted levels.
All of this is backed up
by some beautiful presentation, with
graphs and data
presented in a gorgeous interface.
The Eve app
presents graphs by day, month and year, while the compatibility with HomeKit means users can ask Siri for the temperature or humidity of a room that Eve Room is in.
Scrutinized matured products and
presented results
by using functions such as vlookup, index match and pivot table to extract data and created
graph to illustrate results
Monitor and collect data on individual students regarding targeted behavior Maintain up to date
graphs and charts, organize and
present data to school officials Complete timely and through evaluations, reports, progress notes and correspondence Coordinated special events Apply all laws, rules and regulations regarding child advocacy mandated
by the state of Pennsylvania Generate solutions independently and in conjunction with the students case Manager and clinician.