So, the correlation
graphs presented here cover many different time periods and are generally biased towards more recent history.
The graphs presented here (except for the» Number of titles») are based on the subset that selles more than 1 book a day (rank 100 000 or better), and on that subset, there are more than 45 000 samples (or 45 % has been «polled»).
Not exact matches
(NOTE: The
graph originally in the book is
here converted to a table, with the same data - picture
presented)
I appreciate the information you
present here but can you please modify the color choices to make the
graphs easier to interpret for colorblind people?
Here is a
graph presenting an analysis like the one in Article 8, but with regular spending withdrawals added into the mix.
Here is a copy of the CVS
graph as
presented in the article.
Here are some reactions, including a
graph from my lectures showing what global C emissions would look like if all countries per capita emissions were shared globally, along the lines
presented by Andy:
I'm not sure where our stat guys fetched the data but it came from NOAA and it matches the
graphed anomalies that are
presented here.
The Gregory et al (2013) Fig 1 data used by L&C 2014
presents an intriguing result (
graphed two clicks down
here.)
Here's the logarithm of the wavelet power (using the WWZ, or «weighted wavelet Z - transform») as a function of time and frequency (NOTE: in this
graph, unlike those preceding, time goes from right to left so the
present day is at the far left):
«How can you say «All of the satellite data
presented here end in 2000 ″ when we clearly have UAH plot lines extending to 2008 on several
graphs?
REPLY: How can you say «All of the satellite data
presented here end in 2000» when we clearly have UAH plot lines extending to 2008 on several
graphs?
Mr. Watts, while you are
presenting this new study by Melvin et al. as something that provides results which allegedly refute Mann's hockey stick you do not tell your audience
here that the temperature reconstruction shown in the
graph, explicitly mentioned by you
here, in the Melvin et al paper is done only for a region of Northern Scandinavia, unlike the temperature reconstruction in Mann et al., (1999), doi: 10.1029 / 1999GL900070, which was a reconstruction of the Northern Hemispheric temperature.
``...
here is a
graph that shows in blue the data and trend for 1975 - mid 1997...» «Then in red is the data from mid-1997 to the
present with the red line just being the blue trend line extrapolated to the
present.»
I'd like to consolidate my earlier comment by appending your
graph and
presenting again
here and over at RealClimate and Tamino.
From
here, you'll be able to see a summary of your exercise over the weeks and tapping on each will
present more information, including time active within heart - rate zones, a heart - rate
graph and calories burned, as well as the impact that activity had on your day in terms of steps taken, calories burned and active minutes.