So when it comes to seeking the ultimate Mind, the first and final cause of everything, we can not expect simply tofit the answer inside our heads and
grasp ultimate Reality with natural human reasoning, let alone within purely material categories of understanding.
It also
grasps an ultimate reality in the divine life — the emptying of each triune person in relation to the others.
Not exact matches
All of the stories from all of Man's scriptures are fully accounted for, and so revolutionarily superseded, by Pandeism, which demonstrates the logical probability of all of these nonuniversal propostions as simply reflecting the miscomprehensions of the limited human mind in attempting to
grasp an
ultimate underlying
reality.
For Heidegger, Being is the
ultimate reality, though not itself a thing or substance which can be
grasped with certainty by the mind or relied upon as a metaphysical ground.
In this way the ontological argument, by drawing out the presupposition of metaphysical understanding, indicates that the choice before us is between holding that there is a God and that «
reality» makes sense in some metaphysical manner, whether or not we can ever
grasp what that sense is, and holding that there is no God and that any apparent metaphysical understanding of
reality can only be an illusion which does not significantly correspond to the
ultimate nature of things — unless this «nihilism» be regarded as a kind of metaphysical understanding instead of its blank negation.
Cobb argues similarly that Buddhism
grasps some aspects of «
ultimate reality» which Christianity does not explicate as fully.
Buddhism
grasps some aspects of «
ultimate reality» which Christianity does not explicate as fully.