The
evidence,
evidence that it has not happened in the case
of physical climatology, is the unanimous support
of (practically if not literally) all the various scientific professional groups, national honorary societies, and international panels... which constitutes «the
great bulk of the scientific community»... which in turn speaks for «almost all scientists worldwide» in practice.
Carried as far as blind logic may compel some to go, the notion that statements from the mouth
of the defendant should not be used in
evidence would have a severe and unfortunate impact upon the
great bulk of criminal cases.