Conclusion Intervention by governments and central banks in the workings of a free market has been one of history's
great economic debates, and will certainly continue as such.
«Teachers and
the Great Economic Debate» was the subject of the forum, bringing together thousands to consider how to train, retain and support world class teachers in every classroom to secure North Carolina's future competitiveness.
Not exact matches
We cognicenti know that national debts are not of any
great economic consequence, but it's impossible to defend that position in public
debate.
But until or if the
economic trend flashes a warning sign, there's room for
debate about whether the
great bull market of recent vintage is history.
On Wintour and Watt, he writes that reports of Miliband's speech in yesterday's welfare
debate have missed «the most significant aspect of his speech — an apparent attempt to reframe Labour's
economic policy which is being run by his
great rival Ed Balls.»
«While globalization has created a
great deal of
debate in
economic, policy, and grassroots circles, many aspects of the phenomenon remain unexplored.
The
greater number of deaths in winter (in the UK) compared to the summer, better crops due to a longer season and increased «plant» food are two obvious areas of
debate, as are the
economic benefits by having lower priced energy than will be the case with renewables.
For instance, if the the US not only has
economic interests in the climate change policies in political
debate but also obligations and duties to poor vulnerable nations to not cause them
great harm from US ghg emissions, the United States may not justify failure to act to reduce its ghg emissions on the basis of
economic cost to the US.
The
economic equivalent is the
Great Depression and the boom of post WWII; both were radical swings for and against the larger trend of
greater trade and prosperity for the USA from founding to today (And if one substitutes public debt to CO2 emissions and switches arguments oddly similar
debates arise with the same amount of acrimony on solutions).
As you'll likely know, there's been a
great deal of concern expressed here and elsewhere lately about the
economic state of the profession, the most recent addition to the discussion being Mitch Kowalski's post Articling
Debate Exposes Convocation's Flaws and the comments it garnered.
«The equation * shows * that tokens that are «hot potatoes» will be near worthless, and (store of value) will have far
greater economic value,» he wrote during a short
debate.