It is manifest in the residential choices made by families... [and] when families, sometimes at
great financial sacrifice, decide to send their children to private schools....
Not exact matches
«There's a
greater urgency among women investors to use their growing
financial clout in support of other women and to invest in the future they want — rejecting outdated views about
sacrificing the potential for investment returns or forgoing their own goals in order to do so,» Krawcheck said in a statement.
It's the fans that keep
sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the
financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as
great as you say?
«Giving all veterans the ability to improve their retirement to assure a
greater financial security for themselves and their loved ones is a small price to pay for the
sacrifices they have made for their nation,» Larkin said.
They won before the tribunal (potentially at
great financial cost to the union), but then the EAT allowed the union's appeal by a whisker, holding that there was indeed indirect discrimination in the union
sacrificing certain (female) members» full legal rights for the
greater good of job protection and pay protection for other members but that it was justified — the union's «
greater good» argument was a legitimate aim and (more controversially) its means were proportionate, even though it had been distinctly «hard» in its treatment of the refusenik members.
It's also a
great financial (as well as personal)
sacrifice to pursue a master's or doctoral degree.