Sentences with phrase «great leading man»

From impressive physicality in Marvel's Avengers universe to solid dramatic chops in a film like Rush, Hemsworth is a great leading man in the right role - but here he seems miscast (because most hackers have NFL physiques), off - balance (what accent are we going for?)

He turned out to be a great leading man.

Peele works well with actors too, drawing a great leading man turn from Kaluuya, letting Williams essentially riff on her «Girls» persona, and knowing exactly what to do with Whitford & Keener, both of whom have always had that dangerous edge to their amiability.

The small reward is the cool, confident presence of DMX, who shows signs of being a great leading man.

Not exact matches

Sue warns that, if these hormones do have a profound effect on the immune system, then «men may not be exaggerating symptoms, but have weaker immune responses to viral respiratory viruses, leading to greater morbidity and mortality than seen in women.»

But the man who diverted beer money in college to subscribe to a leading libertarian journal said he had an even greater fear: the bailouts would put the nation on «the slippery slope to socialism.»

Upon Summers» departure from the White House, President Obama said, «I will always be grateful that at a time of great peril for our country, a man of Larry's brilliance, experience and judgment was willing to answer the call and lead our economic team.»

Hilkiah was the High Priest, and doing great — he is moving money from the treasury to the lead construction workers — they are called men so honest that they do not have to account for the funds!

More problematically, when we defend these false descriptions of man, we go against the clear teachings of the Church and lead others to embrace one of the great confusions of our age.

The other is the love that leads to loyalty and sacrifice: «greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.»

«The unification must be accomplished before a man undertakes some unusual work,» but any ordinary work that a man does with a united soul acts in the direction of new and greater unification and leads him, even if by many detours, to a steadier unity than he had before.

And so there live perhaps a great multitude of men who labor off and on to obscure their ethical and religious understanding which would lead them out into decisions and consequences which the lower nature does not love, extending meanwhile their aesthetic and metaphysical understanding, which ethically is a distraction.

Furthermore, these two men were always journeying, led by God towards greater things.

This is why in the Bible, when Herod the Great hears the wise men talking about a star they will follow that will lead them to «the King of the Jews» he orders all the boys under the age of 2 in Bethlehem to be murdered.

I believe we were allowed to choose a dastardly, charismatic man to lead this great nation.

The more the disciples had become impressed by the unique caliber of Jesus during his ministry, and the more their study of the scriptures may have led them to believe that Jesus had been «allotted a portion with the great», 15 the more they would have made comparisons between Jesus and such men as Moses and Elijah.

[7] In the aftermath of the conquests of Alexander the Great, however, Greek dislike of circu - mcision (they regarded a man as truly «naked» only if his prepuce was retracted) led to a decline in its incidence among many peoples that had previously practiced it.

They are functionally identical with biblical visions of joy and hope — the eschatological sense that language and faith may indeed convert and convict and lead men and women to that great imaginative vision of the New Testament: a new heaven and a new earth in place of a crowded and tired planet.

But whatever the emphasis, theological students in classroom, study and chapel are introduced to the great historic reasoning of God with men and led to participate in it.

It exhibits a concern for every man as a companion in the great community, and it leads to ethical sensitivity and self - sacrificing devotion.

I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».

Uncle L is a soft - spoken, unassuming, older man, who has been to prison several times, and is quietly leading the greatest movement of Christians the world has ever seen.

Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..

But the problem is that these ontological ambitions lead directly to the great «incomprehensibles» proclaimed in the Athanasian creed and inseparable from Mouw's absolute ontological gap between God and man.

or rather you tell other atheists what they find inspiring, but when an atheist tells you actually inspirations to them, Hitchens showing that you can and should be unabashedly atheist and not apologize or Dawkins who's writings has led to many people having a greater understanding about the world they live in and how it doesn't need a creator and you wonder how these men aren't inspiring?

Thus, a reader is led from thinking about the patience of God as displayed in the Bible... to early Christian thought as displayed in Tertullian, Cyprian, and Augustine... to the characteristically medieval emphases of Gregory the Great, Aquinas, and Thomas Kempis... and finally to Calvin, Jeremiah Burroughs, and Kierkegaard - men who, though quite separated in time, represent perspectives shaped by the Reformation.

The religions themselves, even the most elevated ones, led women - and naturally men as well - into great depravity.

The Copernican revolution has thus led us by steps to the point where God (presuming for the moment that we can still use this word in a meaningful way) must be much greater than the pre-Copernicans ever imagined, while on the other hand man, in spite of the recent rapid expanse of his knowledge and technology, appears to have been reduced to an infinitesimal role in space.

Naturalism, therefore, leads to frustration and despair because man in his freedom (whereby he transcends nature) must commit himself to something greater than himself.

After the biblical degree came another, two - year course leading to the crown of the Theology programme; by this final degree a man was designated Sententiarius, qualified to lecture on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, the key theology text in all theology schools, a great compilation of texts made in the twelfth century, and very widely commentated since then.

Now the Church is being led by men educated during the Great Disruption that accompanied and followed Vatican II.

5 «The active or «dominating» approach to things we customarily call «manly», refers to many more situations than the sexual one, and though it would not be tenable to state that a woman could not display great courage and activity, the role of leading and mastering the world is nevertheless not as congenial to her as to the man.

Shameful, for a great man to loose his beliefs and compromise his faith and justify a cult for gain... A man that lead so many to the cross to compromise in this way is a slap to all Christians... Rev. Billy Graham and his son Franklin Graham are leading his flack to Hell by condoning and justifying this Mormon cult... I will never listen or support them again...

There were other groups among the Jewish people who belong with far greater right than the Essenes to the antecedents of the movement led by Jesus; such, for example, were those who were waiting for «the Man» who was to come from heaven, or Galilean adherents of the Messianic faith, or pietistic religionists of one sort or another.

A rag - tag group of Apache warriors, led by an elderly man in his late seventies, took on the U.S. Army's Ninth Cavalry in revenge for the death of the great Apache war chief Victorio.

McCarthy has been involved in ongoing contract talks with Everton though the former Wigan Athletic man is yet to be given an improved deal following his superb first season on Merseyside and this has led to a great deal of speculation as to his long term future at Goodison Park.

Lionel Messi's 50 greatest nutmegs Football Rich List: Top Ten Highest Earners REVEALED with Lionel Messi leading pack with Man United pair also featuring

For me Sanchez is better than Hazard, Sanchez had impact on whole team, Cazorla and Ozil are tracking and defending, he led team with example, every Arsenal player is better cuz of him, if you going to compare 2 players you need to look all contribution, yeah Hazard has great dribble stats, but considering this is Sanchezs first season and impact he had, my choice and any reasonble man would be Sanchez.

This weirdo manager who thinks he is still the man to lead us, has left our former great club WITHOUT EVEN ONE DEFENDER WHO CAN PROPERLY DEFEND.

Just cause you're a good business man doesn't mean you'll lead a great sports franchise.

Whatever the thinking behind the decision, the Frenchman will have been delighted with his choice as Walcott put in another great performance and scored a very good goal to open the scoring and lead Arsenal to a thumping win over Tim Sherwood's men.

podolski can not lead the line... fact... great player but not a central striker... he's had enough attempts under wenger... time to leave this one alone... come on danny welbeck... your chance to prove that man u is a shit club that didn't appreciate your talents.

Holland has done a great job of stockpiling picks, now it's time to prove that he's the right man to lead this rebuild, even if some of us think otherwise.

If that is the only area that Arsenal fans have to complain about then they should consider themselves lucky, they have a bright future and they have a great man leading them, that great man though now needs to «step up».

Well im not in a wonderland he has his failings as we all do and great teams find a way to win good teams sit where we are 6 -5-4 but thats besides the point and it would be nice if your aunty had bolocks cause then we d be second but ive watched the games were an offensive team most the time although were terrible in the pissing rain but for the most part the game plans have worked weve created chances quality scoring chances one after the other problem is for me the finishing unless we sit back with 9 man behind the ball or ten when you push forward you will give up a goal if you lousy forwards fail to finish the set ups have been there this year but our strikers have failed to kill the games if we create quality chances and grab leads in the first 60 minutes like we have for the most part and in those games those games should of been killed even if we give a goal or two alongside the strategy but we failed to hit multiple should be goals we tried laca we'll see abou auba although hes a bit lazy so far but we'll see but we've lacked that quality in front goal a player the chances have been there im looking at the failure of the strikers and maybe that is his fault but monreal has scored as many goals recently as our strikers and thats sad our defenders or a midfielder will score and our stikers cant tally one in th first 60 mins of a game alongside them then were tired for last 40 give them hope there still only down one and we rue our missed chances while they push thats where iv been frustrated with this season not the tactics but the finishing

The way they missed all these chances was just bad, don't tell me stoke goalie was doing great the way I saw it the shots on him were really soft and weak, and the chance that giroud missed in the 75th min just proves that he's not good enough to lead a top level football club offences, I've always supported giroud before but now enough is enough, I still support him though because it's not his fault for being our first man it's wenger's fault, who proved to be the most deluded man I've ever seen

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

Mark Hughes's Man City side showed great character to come from two goals down to take the lead against Burnley but a late goal from Kevin McDonald salvaged a well deserved point for the Clarets.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Sam «Ichiro» Harmelech played a great left field and was a great lead off man for the Bulwaers.