The main point of argumentative term paper topic should be supported by
the great number of arguments, which are able to draw a clear and proving evidence of the writer's ideas.
Not exact matches
In the 1800s, in Europe, the
argument for the liberalization
of bankruptcy law, and the introduction
of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing
number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a
great success.
The chief
argument of this book up to this point represents the thinking
of great numbers in the Western world and will presumably, therefore, be convincing to many readers who have given serious thought to the problem
of the reconstruction
of civilization in our time.
If we accept Jamison's
argument that the
greater community might derive an evolutionary benefit from containing a
number of mentally ill people, since such an illness is often accompanied by unusual creative talents, what does this say about the kind
of Creator who guides the evolutionary process?
There are a
number of strong, rational
arguments for the existence
of God proposed by professors in
great universities; there are none for fairies.
The
greatest outcry, however, came from survey organizations who produce the polls, social scientists who utilize poll findings to bolster
arguments about the vitality
of American religion, and a
number of Roman Catholic researchers who argued that we exaggerated the overreporting in their constituency.
Where systematic reviews or meta - analyses are available, allowing analysis
of findings from a
number of well - selected studies, these obviously provide a stronger evidence base on which it is possible to base
arguments with
greater conviction.
Indeed, it could be argued that the rapid expansion
of communication technologies in the decades leading up to the war, which made it easier for reformers to get their
arguments out, gave abolitionists a far
greater role in the sectional conflict than their
numbers would suggest.
Concomitant with the focus on
argument, the Common Core rightly speaks to the inclusion
of a
greater number of non-fiction texts and promotes the practice
of close reading
of complex texts.
Rather than describing a situation in which publishers withheld
great books from consumers (which is what it sounds like on the surface
of his
argument), Byng feels that publishers should cut their titles — and therefore the
number of authors they work with — and instead focus all
of their efforts and attention on a few titles that they deem worthy.
It's a
great discipline to have to put together a coherent
argument for or against a particular stock, and in language that non-finance people can understand, in a limited
number of words.
Cabral's
argument parallels the inverse moral logic that we see in several other aspects
of no - kill militancy ---- a whole different phenomenon from realizing no - kill as the goal
of a
great amount
of sustained targeted sterilization, so that unwanted dogs and cats are no longer born, entering shelters in huge
numbers.
Why put ourselves and our
arguments at the mercy
of those with superior
numbers, more money, and
greater power?
[Response: Your
argument misses the point in three different and important ways, not even considering whether or not the Black Hills data have any general applicability elsewhere, which they may or may not: (1) It ignores the point made in the post about the potential effect
of previous, seasonal warming on the magnitude
of an extreme event in mid summer to early fall, due to things like (especially) a depletion in soil moisture and consequent accumulation
of degree days, (2) it ignores that biological sensitivity is far FAR
greater during the warm season than the cold season for a whole
number of crucial variables ranging from respiration and photosynthesis to transpiration rates, and (3) it ignores the potential for derivative effects, particularly fire and smoke, in radically increasing the local temperature effects
of the heat wave.
While a substantially
greater number of claims can be expected to arise,
arguments about whether or not there can be a fair trial will remain.
Otteau: From our market perspective, the
arguments against higher density and more transportation - efficient zoning are twofold: Less development means fewer cars on the road (although in reality the opposite is true), and higher density equates to higher taxes to fund services for the
greater number of families in an area.