Sentences with phrase «great returns on your money»

«The 20 per cent CESG grant alone is a great return on your money without having to do anything too aggressive,» says Kvick.

It's giving you peace of mind — and that's a great return on your money!

She gets a great return on her money, and the security of the building as collateral.

Borrowers receive the capital they need, while the lenders get a greater return on their money than they would if it sat stagnant in their personal accounts.

If you're looking for a truly great return on your money, to build wealth and to get some security for yourself now and in the future — then a syndication to buy an apartment complex is just what the doctor ordered!

They are a great product and all the investors I have worked with have gotten great returns on their money using the loan product.

Not exact matches

It's not a great three - year return on capital, but it's not the money - losing house of horrors it's made out to be, either.

You want your boss and the company to know that they're getting a great return on the time and money they're investing in you.

For instance, if you realize that you've been spending a great deal of money advertising on Facebook without getting good returns, seek out that expert in Facebook or paid advertising who can best guide and coach you in leveraging this medium (along with other options).

If you can keep your savings above the required minimum balance, a money market account can offer you greater returns on your savings over time.

After interviewing fifty of the world's greatest financial minds, and penning the # 1 New York Times best seller Money: Master the Game, Tony Robbins returns with a step - by - step playbook, taking you on a journey to transform your financial life and accelerate your path to financial freedom.

Thus, if we look at bonds from a historical perspective, interest rates are very low — which is great for those borrowing money — but not so great for those that wish to see higher rates of interest, and return, on their money.

As Poppe put it: «Valeant and the chief executive [Michael Pearson] had a good insight, which is that the U.S. pharmaceutical industry was spending a lot of money on [research and development] and not getting a great return on original research and development ideas.»

And for all the money that was spent on the wedding, the British got a great return on it from all the visitors from around the world and the publicity.

Yes well said.this season is ours.in attack we are fine.in midfield we need someone along side xhaka.in defence we will be fine after the return of kosc and mustafi.so people who want to spend 50M + on VVD, it will be a money wasting.with that money we can buy a great CDM.and we are fine for the season.

get yourself a state of the art stadium, get yourself best manager, get yourself the best players for all the positions money can buy, then have a great marketing team to sell your great team which is wining silverware almost every year that will bring in new and better sponsorship = more money future generation in return will buy your products and bring in bigger share of the TV rights or cable the more games you play in competitions the more gate money and TV and on and on,

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

On - line you will find a crazy amount of Russian women dating services and on most of them you will spend a great bunch of money for actually nothing in returOn - line you will find a crazy amount of Russian women dating services and on most of them you will spend a great bunch of money for actually nothing in returon most of them you will spend a great bunch of money for actually nothing in return.

Starting things off, there's an audio commentary from director Mark Hartley, joined by «Ozploitation Auteurs» Brian Trenchard - Smith, Antony I. Ginnane, John D. Lamond, David Hannay, Richard Brennan, Alan Finney, Vincent Monton, Grant Page, and Roger Ward; a set of 26 deleted and extended scenes, now with optional audio commentary from Hartley and editors Sara Edwards and Jamie Blanks; The Lost NQH Interview: Chris Lofven, the director of the film Oz; A Word with Bob Ellis (which was formerly an Easter Egg on DVD); a Quentin Tarantino and Brian Trenchard - Smith interview outtake; a Melbourne International Film Festival Ozploitation Panel discussion; Melbourne International Film Festival Red Carpet footage; 34 minutes of low tech behind the scenes moments which were shot mostly by Hartley; a UK interview with Hartley; The Bazura Project interview with Hartley; The Monthly Conversation interview with Hartley; The Business audio interview with Hartley; an extended Ozploitation trailer reel (3 hours worth), with an opening title card telling us that Brian Trenchard - Smith cut together most of the trailers (Outback, Walkabout, The Naked Bunyip, Stork, The Adventures of Barry McKenzie, three for Barry McKenzie Holds His Own, Libido, Alvin Purple, Alvin Rides Again, Petersen, The Box, The True Story of Eskimo Nell, Plugg, The Love Epidemic, The Great MacArthy, Don's Party, Oz, Eliza Fraser, Fantasm, Fantasm Comes Again, The FJ Holden, High Rolling, The ABC of Love and Sex: Australia Style, Felicity, Dimboola, The Last of the Knucklemen, Pacific Banana, Centrespread, Breakfast in Paris, Melvin, Son of Alvin, Night of Fear, The Cars That Ate Paris, Inn of the Damned, End Play, The Last Wave, Summerfield, Long Weekend, Patrick, The Night, The Prowler, Snapshot, Thirst, Harlequin, Nightmares (aka Stage Fright), The Survivor, Road Games, Dead Kids (aka Strange Behavior), Strange Behavior, A Dangerous Summer, Next of Kin, Heatwave, Razorback, Frog Dreaming, Dark Age, Howling III: The Marsupials, Bloodmoon, Stone, The Man from Hong Kong, Mad Dog Morgan, Raw Deal, Journey Among Women, Money Movers, Stunt Rock, Mad Max, The Chain Reaction, Race for the Yankee Zephyr, Attack Force Z, Freedom, Turkey Shoot, Midnite Spares, The Return of Captain Invincible, Fair Game, Sky Pirates, Dead End Drive - In, The Time Guardian, Danger Freaks); Confession of an R - Rated Movie Maker, an interview with director John D. Lamond; an interview with director Richard Franklin on the set of Patrick; Terry Bourke's Noon Sunday Reel; the Barry McKenzie: Ogre or Ocker vintage documentary; the Inside Alvin Purple vintage documentary; the To Shoot a Mad Dog vintage documentary; an Ozploitation stills and poster gallery; a production gallery; funding pitches; and the documentary's original theatrical trailer.

This study provides the strongest evidence available on the greater return on investment of targeted preschool interventions in contrast to universal programs in which money is spent on all children, with the limitations on external validity I've described.

Both of those sound great, but in reality they end up being little more than window dressing, and in most cases you'll find out that you wasted your money on a promotion that returned little in the way of finding new readers.

If you're serious about getting your book published, Publishers Marketplace will give you a great return on your investment of time and money.

Gideon's Loop is a science fiction adventure that has a great rating on Amazon and great reviews as well but all I get is people who want to take your money and run with no results and they won't return your emails, for instance pageonelit.com say that they will represent your book for 50 dollars at the BEA CONFERENCE.

Peer to peer loans can also be a great deal for investors, since they may be able to earn a much higher return on their money than through other common alternatives.

The debt used in buyouts has a relatively fixed cost, so if a private equity fund's return on assets (ROA) is greater than this cost, the fund's return on equity (ROE) is higher than if it hadn't borrowed money.

The greater amount of loans in trust that get paid, the better return investors will receive, but if borrowers are falling behind on their payments then investors lose money.

But I'd say the higher priority should be getting money into a tax - advantaged retirement account (a 401 (k) / 403 (b) / IRA), because the tax - advantaged growth of those accounts makes their long - term return far greater than whatever you're paying on your mortgage, and they provide more benefit (tax - advantaged growth) the earlier you invest in them, so doing that now instead of paying off the house quicker is probably going to be better for you financially, even if it doesn't provide the emotional payoff.

✓ You have money to invest for at least 3 years but want access to it within 10 years ✓ The money you're investing is earmarked for retirement or to be passed on to heirs ✓ You've already maxed out your IRA or 401 (k) contributions ✓ You want greater certainty and principal protection ✓ You have other assets in the market exposed to higher expected returns ✓ You want to preserve some liquidity

You specify the minimum annualized rate of return you want, say 24 % / year, and then it sorts all deep in the money covered call candidates that have a rate of return greater than 24 % by downside protection (so the ones with the most protection are on top).

If you think that this cash will most likely be returned to shareholders you have a great deal, if you think the company will find a new way to light money on fire it's not attractive.

These money market accounts are exclusively for younger members & provide greater returns on your deposited funds.

Although these funds claim great returns over a 5 year or 10 year period, it was always based on the assumption on how your money would have grown if you had invested «X» dollars at that start of the period.

Of course, saving money is great and so is investing well for the long haul, but don't miss out on the great monetary returns you can get by simply investing in yourself.

Sure, it's great that it still earned money, but based on the risk that you took on by investing in this fund, your return is much less than expected, which is why your alpha will display as − 4.0.

Because reserve cash requires limited liquidity, it can be invested over a horizon of 6 — 12 months, thereby capturing incrementally higher yields and returns than money market funds, while taking on only slightly greater risk and keeping a focus on preservation of principal.

Peer to peer lending can be a great deal for investors, since they may be able to earn a higher return on their money than through other common alternatives.

To get the most out of your money, select a savings account with a high rate of return like First IB's Money Market Savings account which earns a 0.90 % APY (annual percentage yield) on daily balances of $ 250,000 or less, and 1.16 % APY on balances greater than $ 250money, select a savings account with a high rate of return like First IB's Money Market Savings account which earns a 0.90 % APY (annual percentage yield) on daily balances of $ 250,000 or less, and 1.16 % APY on balances greater than $ 250Money Market Savings account which earns a 0.90 % APY (annual percentage yield) on daily balances of $ 250,000 or less, and 1.16 % APY on balances greater than $ 250,000.

For example, corporations borrow money to buy assets when they expect a return on those assets that is greater than the cost of borrowing.

Lenders (investors) get a return on their money far better than a savings or CD rate (though not without greater risk).

With consumers spending more money online, global electronic payment firms such as Mastercard and PayPal (PYPL) have a «great business model that has high margins, high returns on capital and as consumers change their shopping preferences, whether by channel or by category, they're still spending with the same means.

And if you owe money on your tax return, the urgency to file your return is even greater because the amount you owe is only going to grow the longer you delay.

It's not great that your money is growing at less than inflation but if you're saving for something like a downpayment on a house I would think that (nominal) capital preservation is probably more important than the potential for a higher return with the associated higher risk.

I am Mr Priscilla Gomez by name, i am a citizen of Texas USA, i have been looking forward for a genuine loan company for the past 5 months and all i got was group of scams who made me to trust them and at the end of the day, they duped me of $ 7000 without giving anything in return, all my hope was lost, i got confused and frustrated, i find it very difficult to feed my family, i never wanted to have anything to do with loan companies on net again, because i never trusted any loan company since i was scammed, so i went to borrow some money from a friend, i told him all that happened and he said he can help me, that he knows a loan company that can help me, that he just got a loan from them, he directed me on how to apply for the loan, i did as he told me, i applied, though i never believed but i tried and to my greatest surprise my loan was granted to me within 48 hours, i could not believe, i am happy and rich again and i am thanking God that upon this scams all over the places a genuine company like this still exist, please i advise everyone out there who are in need of loan and can be reliable, trusted and capable of paying back at the due time of funds to contact ([email protected]) and be free from scams on the internet.

JA: It's funny that international stocks outperformed the US, but there's this home bias that people have, and I think a lot of individuals might have missed out on some even greater returns because they might have just kept their money in the U.S.

It's a great way to get a solid return on your money, as well as make extra money over your purchase price.

Matt over at Mom and Dad Money wrote a great article about the effectiveness of cost on returns.

The decision of whether to pay off your student loans or use that money to invest for potentially greater overall returns could have an immense impact on your future financial state, and thus should not be taken lightly.

If Pimco abandons them (unlikely, but not impossible), Janus would get the chance to use them on much less money, which would make the excess returns greater.

With a money market fund, you generally won't get great returns, but you'll hopefully do better than sitting on cash in a savings account.

A thirty year mortgage is a great thing at these rates (I wish I could get a 50 year mortgage), especially if inflation returns to its historical averages of 3 — 4 % or higher, and if you can invest the difference between the monthly payments for the 15 and 30 year mortgage and earn more than 3.88 % on that money you will be much better off than if you'd gotten a 15 year mortgage.