Sentences with phrase «greater absolute loads»

Wretenberg et al. (1996) found that peak knee extensor moments were lower during powerlifting squats than during Olympic weightlifting - style squats, even though the powerlifting squats involved the use of greater absolute loads; Swinton et al. (2012) reported that peak knee extensor moments were greater in the box squat variation than in either the traditional or powerlifting squat variations, but there was no difference between traditional and powerlifting squats.

This would then explain why eccentric training tends to produce greater gains in strength overall, because eccentric training typically involves greater absolute loads (as well as more muscle damage).

They reported no difference in erector spinae muscle activity between the two squat variations despite a greater absolute load being lifted during the back squat.

Not exact matches

Comparing the power clean with the jump squat using the same absolute loads, MacKenzie et al. (2014) reported that peak GRF was greater in the power clean.

Similarly, Gorsuch et al. (2013) reported that the absolute load was greater during squats to above parallel than during squats to parallel, when using the same relative loads.

Comparing the back and overhead squats, Aspe and Swinton (2014) found that the back squat displayed greater ground reaction forces to the overhead squat with the same relative load but similar ground reaction forces when using the same absolute load.

Additionally, while Comfort et al. (2011) found that muscle activity was greater in the superman exercise than in the back squat, this involved a low absolute load and therefore it is unsurprising that Hamlyn et al. (2007) reported greater muscle activity in the back squat than in the superman when using a heavy relative load (80 % of 1RM).

Comparing the box squat and back squat, McBride et al. (2010) reported that the box squat displayed greater ground reaction forces than the traditional squat with 70 % of 1RM (but not 60 % or 80 % of 1RM), when using the same absolute load.

Heavier loads, faster bar speeds, greater depth (with the same absolute and relative loads), and using running shoes rather than no footwear all lead to increased quadriceps muscle activity during back squats.

Faster bar speeds and greater depth with the same absolute loads (but not the same relative loads), lead to increased hamstrings muscle activity during back squats.

In contrast, with the same absolute load (load lifted in both movements equal to 90 % of overhead squat), there was no difference in gastrocnemius muscle activity during the concentric phase yet greater muscle activity during the eccentric phase when performing the overhead squat.

Comparing front and back squats, Comfort et al. (2011) reported greater muscle activity in the front squat than in the back squat (using the same absolute load) but Gullett et al. (2009) and Yavuz et al. (2015) found no differences between front and back squats when using the same relative load.

They report that absolute load was greater during the partial squat compared to the parallel squat.

Rectus abdominis muscle activity tended to be greater in the standing barbell overhead press compared to the front and back squat with the same absolute load.

Finally, with a similar absolute load, greater depth during squats leads to a greater hip extension moment, at least as far as parallel (Bryanton et al. 2012; Yoshioka et al. 2014).

It is expected that performing deadlifts with the same absolute load would produce greatest EMG amplitude in the gluteus maximus when deadlifts are pulled from the lower starting points because external hip extension moment arm lengths and hip extension moments are greatest at lift - off in comparison with knee - passing and lock - out (Escamilla et al. 2000; Escamilla et al. 2002).

Although performing back squats with the same absolute load but to a greater depth has been found to lead to increased gluteus maximus EMG amplitude (Caterisano et al. 2002), this is likely because greater depth leads to greater hip extension moments for the same absolute external load (Bryanton et al. 2012; Clark et al. 2012).

I don't love the fact that it loads from the top, so it doesn't make my cut as the absolute best backpack for business travel, but other than that it has some great security features.