In many cases such contracts can actually provided for
a greater division of assets or rights than the common law, even more than our family law system in Ontario.
Not exact matches
The Scots lawyer would counter that by emphasising the primacy
of equal
division of matrimonial
assets in Scots law (rather than a lesser sum being awarded to satisfy the claimant's perceived needs); the possibility
of a
greater award
of capital to the claimant by utilising s. 9 (1)(b) and (c)
of the 1985 Act; and the generous view
of pensions.
A married couple has often accrued a
great number
of assets over the term
of the marriage, and the
division of these
assets can be a complex situation.
For example, the spouse who proposes a
division of assets would appear to have
greater power, yet the spouse who says «No» to that proposal may also hold a significant degree
of power.
With a summary dissolution, a joint petition is filed when 1) either spouse meets the standard residency requirement, 2) the marriage is irretrievably broken down due to irreconcilable differences, 3) the marriage is childless, 4) the wife is not pregnant, 5) neither spouse owns real estate, 6) there are no unpaid debts
greater than $ 4,000, 7) the total value
of community property is less than $ 25,000, 8) neither spouse has separate property (excluding cars and loans)
of greater than $ 25,000, 9) the spouses have reached an agreement regarding the
division and distributions
of assets and liabilities, 10) both waive their rights to maintenance and appeal; 11) both have read a brochure about summary dissolution and 12) both desire to end the marriage.
It also offers spouses the
greatest degree
of control over their own decision making (with regard to
asset division, issues surrounding the children, what happens to the house, etc.) and it has an added benefit in that agreements reached through mediation are more likely to be adhered to than those obtained through other processes.