Sentences with phrase «greater during squats»

Similarly, Gorsuch et al. (2013) reported that the absolute load was greater during squats to above parallel than during squats to parallel, when using the same relative loads.

Comparing different stance widths, both McCaw and Melrose (1999) and Paoli et al. (2009) found that muscle activity was greater during squats with a wide stance width compared to those with a narrower stance width.

Not exact matches

What's especially great about the curtsy lunge is that most traditional exercises move you forward or back, but this one moves you laterally, requiring you to work muscles you might not be working during regular squats and lunges, Klika says.

Based on a great number of scientific studies and the expertise of many strength coaches, the majority of people will have most benefit from taking a wider stance and turning their feet slightly out (at 15 - 40 degrees) during the squat.

Created by David Weck, the inventor of BOSU, WeckMethod training improves essential ground based movement (walking, running, squatting, jumping, agility) by setting correct tension within the body and generating greater force production and efficiency during athletic activity.

The reason is, that the higher bar position forces the body to stay more upright during the squatting movement and also allows to achieve greater depth, than a lower bar position.

It was great because I don't think that I had pushed myself that hard during squats in a long time.

Heavier loads, faster bar speeds, and greater depth (with the same relative load), all lead to increased erector spinae muscle activity during back squats.

Comparing the back squat and box squat, Swinton et al. (2012) found that rate of force development was 3 — 4 times greater during the box squat variation than during the traditional and powerlifting squat variations.

Comparing squat variations, Russell and Phillips (1989) reported that peak hip extensor moments were greater during the back squat than in the front squat, even when each variation was performed to a standardized depth and with the same relative load.

Heavier loads are lifted during partial rather than parallel squats, by individuals with greater levels of resistance - training experience, and by athletes using a powerlifting - style of squat compared to an Olympic weightlifting - style of squat.

They are greater using a traditional squat than when using a powerlifting - style squat but similar during back and front squats.

They report that the partial squat produced greater medial gastrocnemius muscle activity compared to the parallel squat, despite a greater range of ankle motion during the parallel squat.

Comparing the back squat with sled pulling, Okkonen and Häkkinen (2013) reported that peak ground reaction forces with 70 % of half squat 1RM were greater than during either block starts or sled pulling with loads of 10 % or 20 % of bodyweight.

Heavier loads, faster bar speeds, greater depth (with the same absolute and relative loads), and using running shoes rather than no footwear all lead to increased quadriceps muscle activity during back squats.

They report that the medial gastrocnemius muscle activity was no different between the squat, split squat and rear foot elevated split squat (278, 281, 380 mV), albeit a trend towards greater gastrocnemius muscle activity during the rear foot elevated split squat.

Faster bar speeds and greater depth with the same absolute loads (but not the same relative loads), lead to increased hamstrings muscle activity during back squats.

In contrast, with the same absolute load (load lifted in both movements equal to 90 % of overhead squat), there was no difference in gastrocnemius muscle activity during the concentric phase yet greater muscle activity during the eccentric phase when performing the overhead squat.

Both Wretenberg et al. (1996) and Pick and Becque (2000) found that stronger individuals displayed greater muscle activity than weaker individuals during the back squat.

Wretenberg et al. (1996) found that peak knee extensor moments were lower during powerlifting squats than during Olympic weightlifting - style squats, even though the powerlifting squats involved the use of greater absolute loads; Swinton et al. (2012) reported that peak knee extensor moments were greater in the box squat variation than in either the traditional or powerlifting squat variations, but there was no difference between traditional and powerlifting squats.

During the back squat, greater relative load, a narrow stance and free weight variations appear beneficial.

Wretenberg et al. (1996) found that peak knee extensor moments were greater during both powerlifting squats and during Olympic weightlifting - style squats when performed with greater depth (deep = maximal knee flexion vs. parallel = posterior of the hamstrings parallel to the ground).

Comparing the back squat with knee extensions, Signorile et al. (1994) found that muscle activity was greater during back squats than during knee extensions but Andersen et al. (2006) found the opposite results and Escamilla et al. (1998) found that muscle activity differences depended upon knee angle.

They report that absolute load was greater during the partial squat compared to the parallel squat.

It's a great way to improve hip mobility and to learn how to push the knees outward during the squat.

During the squat, increasing relative load leads to greater external oblique muscle activity but does not alter rectus abdominis or transverse abdominis muscle activity.

Similarly, Shields et al. (2005) also reported that although hamstrings EMG amplitude increased with increasing load during 1 - leg squats, the quadriceps displayed much greater EMG amplitude than the hamstrings at all loads, with the quadriceps - to - hamstrings ratio of EMG amplitude ranging from 2.3 — 3.0.

For example, Youdas et al. (2007) found that males but not females displayed greater hamstrings EMG amplitude than quadriceps EMG amplitude during the split squat.

They reported that peak force was significantly greater during the split squat than during the standard back squat (19.10 ± 3.25 N / kg vs. 14.88 ± 2.22 N / kg).

Moreover, the hip extension moment measured during deadlifts appears to be slightly greater than that measured in the traditional back squat and this may be a result of the greater peak external moment arm at the hip, (c.f. Escamilla et al. 2000; Escamilla et al. 2001b).

They reported no difference in erector spinae muscle activity between the two squat variations despite a greater absolute load being lifted during the back squat.

Finally, with a similar absolute load, greater depth during squats leads to a greater hip extension moment, at least as far as parallel (Bryanton et al. 2012; Yoshioka et al. 2014).

A load position that allows individuals to sit back further during the squat also appears to lead to a greater hip extension moment (Fry et al. 2003; Biscarini et al. 2011; Lorenzetti et al. 2012; Gillette & Stevermer, 2012).

Another common assumption is that strength training with heavy loads produces greater gains in maximum strength during multi-joint, dynamic exercises (like deadlifts, bench presses, and squats) because of larger increases in coordination.