Sentences with phrase «greater erector spinae»

Training with higher loads and faster speeds leads to greater erector spinae muscle activity.

Other studies have also shown consistently greater erector spinae muscle activity when performing the back squat with higher relative loads between 30 — 75 % of 1RM or 60 — 90 % of 3RM, respectively (Willardson et al. 2009; Li et al. 2013; Aspe et al. 2014).

Erector spinae muscle activity was superior in the front squat and the superman exercises compared to the other exercises, and the back squat produced greater erector spinae muscle activity compared to the standing barbell press.

No other exercise has been found to involve greater quadriceps muscle activity than the back squat but the barbell hip thrust involves greater gluteus maximus activity and the deadlift involves greater erector spinae muscle activity.

The deadlift produced the greatest erector spinae muscle activity compared to all other exercises.

Not exact matches

Heavier loads, faster bar speeds, and greater depth (with the same relative load), all lead to increased erector spinae muscle activity during back squats.

Transverse abdominis EMG amplitude is greatest when the barbell is at shoulder level, while erector spinae EMG amplitude and IAP are greatest when the barbell is at mid-shin level.

Most squat variations appear to lead to similar quadriceps, gluteus maximus and erector spinae muscle activity, but the back squat seems to display greater quadriceps muscle activity than either the split squat or overhead squat.

They found that the transverse abdominis was most active when the barbell was at or above shoulder level, while erector spinae EMG amplitude and IAP were greatest when the barbell was at mid-shin level.

In the horizontal back extension, erector spinae muscle activity was greater in maximal lumbar and hip extension than in neutral.

Willardson et al. (2009) reported that the erector spinae displayed significantly greater muscle activity compared to the back squat but this depended upon the exact region measured and this was unclear.

They reported that the erector spinae muscle was greater when the back squat was performed on the floor with loads of 90 and 100 % of 1RM but there were no significant differences between conditions at 70 or 80 % of 1RM.

However, upper erector spinae muscle activity seems to be greater using a barbell.

The erector spinae displays a greater proportion of type I muscle fibers than type II muscle fibers, with type I muscle fiber proportion ranging between 63 — 73 % and 62 — 74 % in the lumbar and thoracic regions, respectively.

Upper erector spinae displays greater muscle activity in the deadlift compared to the back squat.

They reported no difference in erector spinae muscle activity between the two squat variations despite a greater absolute load being lifted during the back squat.

Despite greater 10RM loads in the partial squat (78.4 ± 4.6 kg) compared to the parallel squat (51.2 ± 3.1 kg), erector spinae muscle activity was superior when performing the parallel squat condition.

They reported that erector spinae muscle activity was greater in the ascending phase compared to the descending phase but there was no difference between squat conditions.

The erector spinae muscle activity was significantly greater at all loads when performing the back squat compared with the overhead squat.

Therefore, it appears that the erector spinae displays greater muscle activity in the upper region in the deadlift compared to the back squat, but it is unclear whether a difference in muscle activity exists between the deadlift and the back squat in the lower erector spinae.