Although there is still some disagreement in the preliminary results (eg the description of polar ice caps), a lot of things appear to be quite robust as the climate models for instance indicate consistent patterns of surface warming and rainfall trends: the models tend to agree on a stronger warming in the Arctic and stronger precipitation changes in the Topics (see crude examples for the SRES A1b scenarios given in Figures 1 & 2; Note, the degrees of freedom varies with latitude, so that the uncertainty of these estimates are
greater near the poles).
Not exact matches
The authors noted that the transmission
poles are taller than any other object in the study area and that nesting in or
near them may afford the raven myriad advantages including a wider range of vision,
greater attack speed and easier take - off.
And if the warming over the rest of the world is not attributable to greenhouse gases or «solar output», then «the
greater climate change
near the
pole compared to the rest of the hemisphere or globe» is not attributable to them.
The RealClimate post on Polar Amplification... http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/01/polar-amplification/... begins with the statement, «' Polar amplification» usually refers to
greater climate change
near the
pole compared to the rest of the hemisphere or globe in response to a change in global climate forcing, such as the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) or solar output (see e.g. Moritz et al 2002).»
How about this one, ««Polar amplification» usually refers to
greater climate change
near the
pole compared to the rest of the hemisphere or globe in response to a change in global climate forcing, such as the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) or solar output (see e.g. Moritz et al 2002).
This snowpack accumulation
near the
poles, which gets its water via the Arctic and Antarctic oceans, that in turn rob it from equatorial latitudes of our oceans, also results in a reduction in the earth's spin axis moment of inertia and causes the spin rate to increase as evidenced in the recent history of the rate at which Leap Seconds are added to our calendar (see Wysmuller's Toucan Equation for more on this evidence that during this warm time with much
greater polar humidity, earlier seasonal, later seasonal and heavier snows are beginning to move water vapor from the oceans to the
poles to re-build the polar ice caps and lead us into a global cooling, while man - made CO2 continues to increase http://www.colderside.com/faq.htm).
Secondly, midwinter ice at either of the
poles is not a measure of
great value because even with significant warming, it is still way below freezing when the sun is gone for months, and the entire area at or
near the
pole is going to freeze.
«Polar amplification» usually refers to
greater climate change
near the
pole compared to the rest of the hemisphere or globe in response to a change in global climate forcing, such as the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) or solar output (see e.g. Moritz et al 2002).
The study also notes that global warming is
greatest at higher latitudes
near the
poles.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/01/polar-amplification/ «Polar amplification» usually refers to
greater climate change
near the
pole compared to the rest of the hemisphere or globe»