Not exact matches
Incredible as it may seem, heat
radiation is the
greatest source of uncertainty when projecting which asteroids could hit Earth in the far future.
There have been a host of efforts to describe Japan's earthquake and nuclear emergency, ranging from volumes of helpful graphics generated by The Times and other media to freelance efforts, including the «sonification» of a month of earthquake activity surrounding the
great quake off Japan by Paul May and a chart by Randall Munroe comparing human
radiation exposure from an array of
sources — ranging from a banana to a mammogram to a leaking nuclear plant and «A Layman's Intro to
Radiation» by Ellen McManis, who operates a research reactor at Reed College.
Now, add a
source at
greater than 15C (like a warm earth surface) and ad long as the rate of incoming 15 um
radiation is
greater than the 15 um
radiation rate you already measured from your hohlraum there will be disequilibrium and the temperature of the hohlraum (not just the CO2 but all of the gas) will increase until the hohlraum is again emitting the same amount of 15 um
radiation as is coming in.
This is a factor of 1.9 times
greater than the incoming Sun's
radiation without any additional energy
source required.
As the Chief tells us, clouds have changed from the late 20thC to the early 21stC, resulting in a
greater reflection of incoming SW
radiation (the prime
source of our planet's warming).
However, my main point was not so much about the «make up» of ozone but more about the possibility that as long as oxygen atoms and molecules absorb enough energy from UV
radiation to alter their structure it may be that they also produce an increase in their heat content, which should be
greater at any points nearest to the
source — i.e..
Tim may have been forced into this revision since he has commented several times that
radiation can not heat an object to a temperature
greater than the temperature of the radiating
source.