Not exact matches
Widely affirmed proposals call for the restructure of low - performing schools, more emphasis on the basics, safer classrooms, more rigorous graduation standards, periodic measurement of progress through some kind of standardized tests, longer days and year - round schooling, decentralization into smaller learning communities and
greater freedom for those smaller units, smaller classes, better - qualified
teachers and improved salaries, more parental
input and more equitable funding.
This is evident in the policy of the government, which pays
greater attention to trivial educational
inputs, such as common uniforms for pupils at the expense of regular payment of
teachers salaries.
Rather than today's system, which focuses on «
input regulations» such as textbook mandates; seat time rules; cumbersome, outdated certification requirements; and professional development units, public officials should place
greater emphasis on vastly improved data systems, better
teacher evaluations, curricular quality, and meaningful accountability.
The public is largely disenchanted with the way the federal No Child Left Behind Act measures student learning and
teacher quality, and it would like
greater input into the law's implementation, a report scheduled for release this week by the Public Education Network finds.
They also enable classroom
teachers to define where they need the
greatest input of training and professional development.
In sum, they amount to less than a full sentence vow to replace Common Core «with better standards and curriculum developed by New York educators, with feedback and
input from local
teachers and parents, and
greater control at the district level.»
That initial list has been revised with
input from hundreds of
teachers and scholars; today's Core Knowledge Sequence contains a
great diversity of people, events, and ideas.
Recent studies have also suggested that using a design - based research (DBR) approach, which affords
teachers greater input and agency in the design of PD and their own educational experience, may be a useful alternative to evaluative approaches to improvement of PD (Anderson & Shattuck, 2012).
With
input from
teachers and other experts, Public Impact has published numerous school models that offer different possibilities for time use and role flexibility, making the best use of
great teachers» valuable time and returning the respect you deserve by paying more for reaching more students with excellence.
Developed in collaboration and consultation with the Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Midwest Educator Effectiveness Research Alliance, REL Midwest, and the Center on
Great Teachers and Leaders (GTL Center), the tools are based on a review of the
teacher leadership literature and stakeholder
input.
Teachers are eager to give
input on how this evolving plan can invest more expansively in
great schools for all students.
You HAVE to get professionally edited ~ and not by your old Enlish
teacher, friend, spouse, or critique group (as
great as their
input can be).