Not exact matches
Performance metrics tied directly to student test - score growth are appealing because although schools and teachers differ dramatically in their effects on student achievement, researchers have had great difficulty linking these performance differences to characteristics that are easily observed an
Performance metrics tied directly to
student test - score growth are appealing because although schools and teachers differ dramatically
in their effects on
student achievement, researchers have had
great difficulty linking these
performance differences to characteristics that are easily observed an
performance differences to characteristics that are easily observed and measured.
«
In countries like France and the United States, perceived disadvantage is far greater than real disadvantage, and it makes a significant difference for student performance,» Schleicher wrote in the articl
In countries like France and the United States, perceived disadvantage is far
greater than real disadvantage, and it makes a significant
difference for
student performance,» Schleicher wrote
in the articl
in the article.
However, schools that select
students based on ability, show the
greatest differences in performance by socio - economic background.
The
difference in test scores produced by the incentive system was about the same as that detected
in earlier studies that measured
differences in student performance when kids were taught by
great teachers rather than average teachers.
Of the five states (Arizona, Florida, Ohio, California and Texas) that opened the
greatest number of charter schools
in the first 10 years of chartering, four posted negative
student achievement results while the fifth (California) showed no significant
difference between charter and traditional public school
performance.