Not exact matches
The
greatest threat to traditional marriage came with the Industrial
Revolution which made the collective workplace rather than the family farm or cottage industry the means of
economic support.
The Progressives that wanted the radical change in voting, and who wanted moral and
economic control of all Americans to bring about the
great social
revolution?
The fight for an eight hour workday led to a
greater social
revolution and a drastic change in
economic structure.
The result was a series of catastrophic policies (like the cultural
revolution) that caused
great harm (from purges of opponents,
economic dislocation and famine).
The human workings of Japan's
great economic machine are not explored here: the cooperative dynamics that have produced the Japanese industrial
revolution as well as a world - defying absence of street crime.
Even though Russia is still a strongly traditional society and a mother remains by far the dominant female archetype in Russian culture, historically women in Russia often have had to take on
greater responsibility for the family and learn to survive due to country numerous wars,
revolutions and
economic collapses.
K - 4.3 The History of the United States: Democratic Principles and Values and the People from Many Cultures Who Contributed to Its Cultural,
Economic, and Political Heritage GRADES 5 - 12 NSS - USH.5 - 12.1 Era 1: Three Worlds Meet (Beginnings to 1620) NSS - USH.5 - 12.2 Era 2: Colonization and Settlement (1585 - 1763) NSS - USH.5 - 12.3 Era 3:
Revolution and the New Nation (1754 - 1820s) NSS - USH.5 - 12.4 Era 4: Expansion and Reform (1801 - 1861) NSS - USH.5 - 12.5 Era 5: Civil War and Reconstruction (1850 - 1877) NSS - USH.5 - 12.6 Era 6: The Development of the Industrial United States (1870 - 1900) NSS - USH.5 - 12.7 Era 7: The Emergence of Modern America (1890 - 1930) NSS - USH.5 - 12.8 Era 8: The
Great Depression and World War II (1929 - 1945) NSS - USH.5 - 12.9 Era 9: Postwar United States (1945 to early 1970s) NSS - USH.5 - 12.10 Era 10: Contemporary United States (1968 to the Present)
I discuss these ideas in
greater detail in Money, Blood and
Revolution where I also explain how the circulatory growth model can be used to understand why the excessive use of monetary stimulus — both through low rates and quantitative easing — leads directly to: structurally low
economic growth, higher social inequality, deflationary pressures, high government deficits and an inevitable pressure for higher taxation.
As we say, a good development that ultimately could lead to more domestic oil and natural gas in support of America's ongoing energy
revolution,
greater U.S. energy security, the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs and positive
economic growth into the next two decades.
And even though one state premier called the interim report «one of the most sobering briefings in my 22 years in office,» and the new Prime Minister hinted at at a «global
economic transformation to a low carbon economy of an order of magnitude that we have not seen since the
great economic transformation of the Industrial
Revolution,» the impact of the report seems to have waned in the intervening period.
Throughout human history, money has fueled the rise and fall of empires, driven
great wars, and enabled the blossoming of social,
economic, and scientific
revolutions.
On the one hand, the Industrial
Revolution represented optimism and hope for the future in terms of
great advances in technology, agriculture and general
economic growth.