Why can we not speak the truth and admit that Islam is perhaps
the greatest evil the world has ever known, and act accordingly.
Unleashed after the Germans unearthed the mysterious «Element 115,» this next chapter in the Zombies legacy will explore the saga's origins as players reunite with an unlikely band of soldiers that come together to defeat
the greatest evil the world has ever seen, using a period - specific arsenal that includes Wonder Weapons that harness supernatural powers, a diesel - drone and Mark IV tank, as well a new perk machine and power - ups — and that's just the start.
Not exact matches
There are two
great evils in this
world... religion and politics.
An example of the comments they were referring to was a tweet sent on 1st March 2013 from Dawkins saying «I think Islam is the
greatest force for
evil in the
world today.
It is simply false, therefore, to claim that Plantinga must view all
evils in the actual
world as necessary for bringing about some
greater good or avoiding some
greater evil.
Rather than viewing conflict as the second
greatest evil, conflict is an opportunity to grow and give the
world something beautiful, a picture of the gospel, a picture of God.
Plantinga need only acknowledge that the possible
world containing Hitler's actions — i.e., the actual
world — contains the
greatest net amount of good over
evil of any possible
world containing free moral agents which God was free to actualize.
Another condition of us being in this life to experience a
world of both good and
evil is that we go through this life for a limited time only, and that for us to obtain the
greatest happiness that God can give us, it can't be done if were all dead without any means to overcome death.
I am of opinion this is not when we misjudge a charismatic event and call it
evil, for elsewhere, «Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the
world,» (1 John 4:1), and «For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform
great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.»
To be sure, the cracks in the realistic surface, the surrealism, are far
greater than in parables in the «Primary
World,» but the story is still parabolic, for the transcendent unfamiliar, both good and evil, operative in this tale works within the givens of this w
World,» but the story is still parabolic, for the transcendent unfamiliar, both good and
evil, operative in this tale works within the givens of this
worldworld.
But, there is of course a
great deal of
evil in the
world, and if God is indeed omnipotent, omni - competent, and omni - voluntarist, somehow God must be responsible for that
evil either directly or — as theologians have phrased it — permissively.
Want to know the single
greatest evil in the
world?
Some of us look forward with
great eagerness and expectation for when Jesus will come again to throw off the
evil governments and set up His own righteous rule, but not before He slays our enemies, kills the wicked, bathes the
world in bloodshed, burns away all those who did not follow Him, and banishes the unrighteous into pits of never - ending fire to suffer and burn for all eternity.
A long time for a
great evil — the religion of Paul which has spread across the
world encouraging persecution of dissenters, slavery, an inferior societal role for women, persecution of homosexuals and criminalization of ordinary sexual behaviors of both gay and straight people, quite a few wars, poverty and ignorance.
Whereas Pagels discusses second - century theologians who offer alternatives to Augustine's problematic freedom, she ignores the
great «heretic» Marcion, who finally concluded that the creator of a
world in which there is so much
evil is a deeply flawed deity, the very God from whom we must be redeemed.
Secondly, I do not believe that «the possible
world containing Hitler's actions — i.e., the actual
world — contains the
greatest net amount of good over
evil of any possible
world containing free moral agents which God was free to actualize.»
More importantly, I do not believe the actual
world «contains the
greatest net amount of good over
evil of any possible
world containing free agents» God could have actualized; I see no reason to think there is any such
world.
@ToddKincannon I think Islam is the
greatest force for
evil in the
world today.
Yet at the same time, by always insisting on the inadequacy of philosophy to explain
evil, they resist any tendency to «explain
evil away» or «neutralize» it by a
greater good, and thereby render
evil in our
world terribly real to us.
You can not be possessed by a demon, you can not be controlled by an
evil spirit, for
greater is He that is in you, than he that is in the
world (1 John 4:4).
He spoke of the
evils of «an economy of exclusion and inequality» and singled out for censure those who «continue to defend trickle - down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about
greater justice and inclusiveness in the
world.»
For him, it is not the systematic
world of the speculative philosopher that is of
greatest value, but the natural, chaotic process which lies hidden behind the falsifying face of reason, a process whose true nature can only be known on a purely aesthetic level through experience in its immediacy («Beyond Good and
Evil,» BWN Section 213; «Will to Power,» Section 794).
The celebrated «
greatest generation» of
World War II produced the architects of Cold War «containment,» who were vindicated almost a half century later with the end of «the
evil empire.»
He comments in Religion in the Making, «The fact of
evil, interwoven with the texture of the
world, shows that in the nature of things there remains effectiveness for degradation... the loss of the
greater reality.»
I believe, as do the adventists, that there is
great need of commitment to Christ and a personal religion that will give hope in troubled times and withstand the
evil, even demonic, forces abroad in our
world.
Moreover, they answer the
great philosophical challenges to believing in God, most notably the Problem of
Evil: how can a good, all - powerful, all - knowing God produce a world with so much evil in
Evil: how can a good, all - powerful, all - knowing God produce a
world with so much
evil in
evil in it?
Don't say, the power of
evil, of the wicked
world, is
great, but we, we are guiltless....
I do believe that there is a force of
evil in the
world that is
greater than the sum of its parts, and that in the normal course of life in the kingdom, real resistance will be encountered.
It is this: that the
greatest evils which harass the modern
world and which threaten it with destruction are the lineal descendants of the doctrine that man is naturally good.
Bad things happen to Christians; good things happen to those who not only are unbelievers, but who also do
great evil in this
world.
This is not in the least to suggest that human beings are not responsible for
great evil in the
world.
They uniformly maintain instead that God may have had to settle for far less than the best and thus that this
world may well contain a
great deal of genuine
evil (GFE 29 - 44).
The relationship of the cross to our salvation, the connection between the suffering of Christ and human suffering, the need for God to become physically entangled in the
world's
evil and pain — this is too
great a mystery for intellectual comprehension.
Cardinal Bourne noted that war was «one of the
greatest material
evils that the
world can see, but our Divine Master has warned us that it is an
evil for which we must be prepared».
That's
great but, and we're often challenged on this, if there is a God, and if He is so loving, then how come there is so much suffering and
evil in this
world?
Christian ethics starts from the position that God created the
world for good and that war involves
great evil, and calls us to a stewardship that enjoys much convergence based on agape as redeeming love, but also significant divergences over the best strategies to establish peace with justice.
Hard though it must have been to say it, the
Great Isaiah, facing Zoroastrianism's division of power between Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu, insisted that the one God alone was the responsible creator of the
world, with its light and its darkness, its good and its
evil.
(4) In the absence of an explanation why God does not use more coercive power and is not more effective in his persuasion we may as reasonably conclude that there is a
great evil persuasive power behind phenomena in the
world as that there is a
great power persuading toward the good.
Both are important in every person's life — even humanism / atheism is a set of beliefs and morals, both have been used for
great good and
great evil, thorough understanding and acceptance of both is essential to thriving in today's multicultural
world.
This view paints God as a helpless victim of
evil, and though He wishes the
world were otherwise, His only options are to choose between various
evils, and when confronted with the choice, He chooses the
greatest evil in a vain attempt to show how terrible
evil truly is.
But note that this
greater evil is variously identified — by some, as the spread of communism; by others, as the exploitation of the Third
World by the capitalist nations.
There was
great evil in the
world during the time of the flood, much worse than we see in the
world now.
The Eternal God, so they maintain, coming in weakness in Christ so provoked the
evil in man that the official representatives of as high a religion and of as good a government as the
world had known committed the
greatest crime in history, the crucifixion of the Son of God.
Although Hasker concludes this argument by pointing out that for it too «it is God who is responsible for the existence of creatures who have the freedom and power to bring about
great evils,» I had explicitly said that «God is responsible for [the distinctively human forms of
evil on our planet] in the sense of having encouraged the
world in the direction that made these
evils possible» (Process 75; cf. God 308 - 09).
But when we look at the
world around us, we find prevalent instances of apparently gratuitous
evil — pointless suffering from which no
greater purpose seems to result.
How can God «purpose» the
greatest evil in the
world?
When Marcion, the
greatest of the second - century Christian dualists, insisted that the
world was so fundamentally
evil that the Creator God of the Old Testament, who was responsible for so immense a debacle, could only be a morally defective being, he was not speaking as some disillusioned idealist: rather, he was reflecting the hard, unsentimental realism of his time.
Once we come to some such religious vision, however, those who share in a profound faith such as the
great religions make possible (and in our own part of the
world, that means the Christian faith) can have a deep confidence that from the ruination of existence, which is the result of those
evils just mentioned, the cosmic Love can extract genuine and abiding good.
Vintage charts are never perfect — the
world of wine is complex, and summaries and short - cuts are a necessary
evil, but those who trust in them will miss out on some
great wine.
While tribal loyalty towards your club and players is all too common and understandable in the
world of football, this episode really doesn't paint Reds fans in a
great light as they essentially hurled abuse at a player who'd been the victim of racism — an
evil that all fans in the game should be united in wanting to stamp out.