Not exact matches
This is
great, but if you really want to see what what God's love looks like, look to Jesus dying on a cross for the
sins of the world, including the
sins of those who are whipping his back and legs until his skin is gone and then laying that back on a rough and splintery wooden cross to crucify him, and continuing the torture until he's unrecognizable as a
human being.
While we do not claim that
human beings are enslaved by
sin, we are aware of the
great capacity that
humans have for evil as well as for good.
> His suffering for
sin, though He entered of His own will, The statement is true but there is an important angle that is missed as we see the
GREAT battle of WILLS between the
human Jesus and the Father!
For Kierkegaard there is no «solution» to this paradox, other than the
greater paradox of the God - man, who, without ever making the leap into
sin, became
sin for us, i.e., accepted his
human solidarity with us, so that in him we might be reconciled with God through the Atonement.
This law is made to curb
human sin, for it assumes that man will, if left alone, take
greater vengeance than was taken on him.
Although this is not the place to discuss at
greater length the nature of evil,
human sin, suffering, death and the relationship between them, they must find mention here for they constitute the chief problems which continually confront man and make him question whether there is any justice or meaning to be found in life.
It is one of the
great merits of Reinhold Niebuhr's thought that while he regards the doctrine of «original
sin» as a myth which is absurd to reason and necessary to faith, he has given us one of the most astute analyses of the source of
sin in
human nature which Christian thought has ever achieved.12 His account is this.
As Jesus» will was always centred on the Father and his mind was not clouded by the attractions of
sin, he was able to grasp the true tragedy of our
human condition in a way that only
great saints have understood.
Sin evokes, one mighteven say provokes, within the
human heart of Christ an even
greater outpouring of undeserved love, but it is never the author of that love nor the reason for the existence of that most Sacred Heart.
To be
human is a really
great thing —
sin is an aberration that lessens our humanity.
Jesus - fully
human and fully god, why do you think God would humble himself and be with his creation (total love), when
sin entered the world we were seperated from God forever, God pure, and
humans tainted, the only way was for God to send Jesus to pay the price of
sin, he took the sting out of death, and bridged the gap for
humans and heaven, there is no
greater sacrifice, God loves all of us, I was an unbeliever, but came to the truth - read the book of John and make up your own mind - so many people taint Gods word, but the Holy bible is the truth and it will set you free.
It isn't about
human rituals but about believing the Holy Messiah, Jesus Christ by name to the Christian community did bear the sufferings for our
sins, so that we, by repentance (turning away from our
sins) and following in the teachings of the Messiah to become the «new man in him» can be forgiven, and given the
great mercy and grace that we all need, in order to be saved, and not destroyed with all that is evil.
Rowling deals with
human sin in a realistic and very modern fashion: even figures of
great authority commit
sins and must learn wisdom in the wake of youthful folly.
For the
greatest possible
human misery,
greater even than
sin, is to be offended in Christ and remain offended.
Meanwhile, another sequence in which Talorel has to atone for the
sins he has committed as a
human is a
great opportunity to play on how people are inherently sinful, how we seemingly can't get through an entire day without committing some sort of
sin in the eyes of the Church or God, but that gets flown through quickly.
Evidently his mortal
sin against the Climate Cult was pointing out that
human - caused climate change is not inflicting
greater economic damage due to extreme weather, an empirical truth that cuts against one of the most sacred dogmas of politicized science.