«The Northern Rockies have shown
the greatest response to warming in terms of snowpack decline,» said lead author Greg Pederson, a research scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey's Northern Rocky Mountain Research Center.
Not exact matches
The lethargic
response to previous
warm weather breaks (and my own recollection of the first day back in the office after a week at the beach) does not instil the
greatest confidence that today will see an up and at «em, all guns a-blazing display from the first whistle.
Emerging evidence for variability in the coral calcification
response to acidification, geographical variation in bleaching susceptibility and recovery,
responses to past climate change, and potential rates of adaptation
to rapid
warming supports an alternative scenario in which reef degradation occurs with
greater temporal and spatial heterogeneity than current projections suggest.
Therefore studies based on observed
warming have underestimated climate sensitivity as they did not account for the
greater response to aerosol forcing, and multiple lines of evidence are now consistent in showing that climate sensitivity is in fact very unlikely
to be at the low end of the range in recent estimates.
I thank Patrick Brown for his detailed
response (also here)
to statistical issues that I raised in my critique «Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global
warming will not be
greater than we thought» of his and Ken Caldeira's recent paper (BC17).
Evernote is also a
great app for journal writing — have students take a picture of their choice, then write about it in
response to a prompt for a daily
warm - up.
Explores natural beauty, spirituality, family diversity, peace, war, poverty, harmony with nature, Global
Warming,
responses to suffering, diversity of age, disability etc with some
great quotes.
:) The following concepts are covered in this DECEMBER CHRITSMAS Google Math Centers Pack: Wrap up
Warm (Addition) Hot Cocoa (Place Value) Icy Tallies (Tallies) Tinsel Trees (Measurement) Gift Store (Money) Sledding Fun (1 more / less) Sledding Fun (10 more / less) Santa's Sack (
Greater than Less than) Jingle Bells (Skip Counting) Snowman Subtraction (Subtraction) Included in this download are the following 9 Digital Google Math Centers already on Google Slides in Google Drive A «How
To» Guide 9 Response Sheets for Students 9 PPT math centers incase you would like these to be accessed on a classroom computer directly instead of google drive / slide
To» Guide 9
Response Sheets for Students 9 PPT math centers incase you would like these
to be accessed on a classroom computer directly instead of google drive / slide
to be accessed on a classroom computer directly instead of google drive / slides.
Indeed, snowfall is often predicted
to increase in many regions in
response to anthropogenic climate change, since
warmer air, all other things being equal, holds more moisture, and therefore, the potential for
greater amounts of precipitation whatever form that precipitation takes.
Therefore studies based on observed
warming have underestimated climate sensitivity as they did not account for the
greater response to aerosol forcing, and multiple lines of evidence are now consistent in showing that climate sensitivity is in fact very unlikely
to be at the low end of the range in recent estimates.
Re 9 wili — I know of a paper suggesting, as I recall, that enhanced «backradiation» (downward radiation reaching the surface emitted by the air / clouds) contributed more
to Arctic amplification specifically in the cold part of the year (just
to be clear, backradiation should generally increase with any
warming (aside from greenhouse feedbacks) and more so with a
warming due
to an increase in the greenhouse effect (including feedbacks like water vapor and, if positive, clouds, though regional changes in water vapor and clouds can go against the global trend); otherwise it was always my understanding that the albedo feedback was key (while sea ice decreases so far have been more a summer phenomenon (when it would be
warmer to begin with), the heat capacity of the sea prevents much temperature
response, but there is a
greater build up of heat from the albedo feedback, and this is released in the cold part of the year when ice forms later or would have formed or would have been thicker; the seasonal effect of reduced winter snow cover decreasing at those latitudes which still recieve sunlight in the winter would not be so delayed).
In
response to increased trace gases, all replicated the qualitative
response seen in other coupled ocean - atmosphere models:
greater warming over land than ocean and maximum
warming at high northern latitudes in winter.
Pt 4, «The Wunsch / RealClimate Thing»: In this instance, we are asked
to believe that a common citizen, Dave Rado, outraged over lies in «The
Great Global
Warming Swindle», somehow also knew one of the «seemingly skeptic» scientists in the video had been hoodwinked
to appear in it, and that the scientist this confirmed this via a direct email
response regarding the inquiry Rado sent mere hours after watching the video.
This was not the case when using the
response to solar forcing based on the alternative reconstruction of Lean et al. (1995), in which case they find a very small likelihood (less than 1 %, as opposed
to approximately 10 %) that solar
warming could be
greater than greenhouse
warming since 1950.
Hamish Mykura has done something quite impressive: he has managed
to pack almost as many distortions and misrepresentations into his
response (1)
to my article about Channel 4 as Martin Durkin crammed into The
Great Global
Warming Swindle.
This week's episode includes Marcus Brigstocke's comments on the Ofcom
response to the complaint against The
Great Global
Warming Swindle.
The
Great Global
Warming Swindle received critical
response from the scientific community, including a letter
to ABC that was signed by thirty - seven British Scientists who claimed «the misrepresentations of facts and views, both of which occur in your programme, are so serious that repeat broadcasts of the programme, without amendment, are not in the public interest.
The IPCC chairman's
response to The
Great Global
Warming Swindle sheds light on his pathetic leadership.
-LSB-...] thank Patrick Brown for his detailed
response (also here)
to statistical issues that I raised in my critique «Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global
warming will not be
greater than we thought» -LSB-...]
-LSB-...] Patrick Brown for his detailed
response (also here)
to statistical issues that I raised in my critique «Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global
warming will not be
greater than we thought» -LSB-...]
-LSB-...] thank Patrick Brown for his detailed
response (also here)
to statistical issues that I raised in my critique «Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global
warming will not be
greater than -LSB-...]
Just because
great climate flips can happen in
response to global
warming doesn't mean that they are the most probable outcome of our current situation, what one might «forecast» (that's one of the reasons why I've been careful not
to «predict» a cooling in the next century).
We show that although increases in greenhouse - gas concentrations have driven the observed
warming over the past century, approximately 60 % of the greenhouse - gas - induced
warming has been offset by the combined
response to other anthropogenic forcings, which is substantially
greater than the fraction of global greenhouse - gas - induced
warming that has been offset by these forcings.
What has the
response to Spencer and Braswell (2008) been like since the publication of The
Great Global
Warming Blunder?
It was set up in the early 1930s in
response to the rapidly
warming arctic and collected a
great deal of data in order
to be able
to charge for transit permits
The MWP is better explained by the Arctic Amplification effect whereas northern hemisphere
warming is amplified due
to faster thermal
response to climate forcing due
to greater land mass and less ocean mass; compared
to the southern hemisphere which is largely water (which has a slower thermal inertial
response to climate forcings).
[
Response: Your argument misses the point in three different and important ways, not even considering whether or not the Black Hills data have any general applicability elsewhere, which they may or may not: (1) It ignores the point made in the post about the potential effect of previous, seasonal
warming on the magnitude of an extreme event in mid summer
to early fall, due
to things like (especially) a depletion in soil moisture and consequent accumulation of degree days, (2) it ignores that biological sensitivity is far FAR
greater during the
warm season than the cold season for a whole number of crucial variables ranging from respiration and photosynthesis
to transpiration rates, and (3) it ignores the potential for derivative effects, particularly fire and smoke, in radically increasing the local temperature effects of the heat wave.
I thank Patrick Brown for his detailed
response (also here)
to statistical issues that I raised in my critique «Brown and Caldeira: A closer look shows global
warming will not be
greater than we thought» of his and Ken Caldeira's recent paper (BC17).
The IPCC's
response, I think, will be
to maintain that the Earth's Heat Uptake, in the sense of
warming oceans, is much
greater than previously thought.