However, girls with comorbid problems had
the greatest social impairment.
Compared to typically developing adolescents, those with ASD showed both over - and under - connectivity in the ToM network, which was associated with
greater social impairment.
Not exact matches
[52] My sense is that the plaintiff in the case at bar has suffered a
greater degree of pain, disability, emotional suffering,
impairment of family and
social relationships, and loss of lifestyle than the plaintiffs in the Malcolm and L.A.M. cases.
Among older patients, whose prevalence rate of depression is very high, these problems were aggravated by concurrent medical illness,
social isolation, functional
impairment or being home - bound.14 — 20 Overcoming these barriers by providing interventions in patients» own homes may achieve better treatment adherence and thereby
greater treatment success than clinic - based or hospital - based interventions.
As a result, they tend to spend more time onlooking (watching other children without joining) and hovering on the edge of
social groups.8, 11 There is some evidence to suggest that young depressive children also experience
social impairment.12 For example, children who display
greater depressive symptoms are more likely to be rejected by peers.10 Moreover, deficits in
social skills (e.g.,
social participation, leadership) and peer victimization predict depressive symptoms in childhood.13, 14 There is also substantial longitudinal evidence linking
social withdrawal in childhood with the later development of more significant internalizing problems.15, 16,17 For example, Katz and colleagues18 followed over 700 children from early childhood to young adulthood and described a pathway linking
social withdrawal at age 5 years — to
social difficulties with peers at age 15 years — to diagnoses of depression at age 20 years.
During the prenatal and infant periods, families have been identified on the basis of socioeconomic risk (parental education, income, age8, 11) and / or other family (e.g. maternal depression) or child (e.g. prematurity and low birth weight12) risks; whereas with preschoolers a
greater emphasis has been placed on the presence of child disruptive behaviour, delays in language / cognitive
impairment and / or more pervasive developmental delays.6 With an increased emphasis on families from lower socioeconomic strata, who typically face multiple types of adversity (e.g. low parental educational attainment and work skills, poor housing, low
social support, dangerous neighbourhoods), many parenting programs have incorporated components that provide support for parents» self - care (e.g. depression, birth - control planning), marital functioning and / or economic self - sufficiency (e.g. improving educational, occupational and housing resources).8, 13,14 This trend to broaden the scope of «parenting» programs mirrors recent findings on early predictors of low - income children's
social and emotional skills.
This 36 - item measure is the short form of the original Medical Outcomes Survey34 to measure functional
impairment and contains eight subsections: (1) physical activity limitations due to health problems; (2)
social activity limitations due to physical or emotional problems; (3) usual role activity limitations due to physical health problems; (4) bodily pain; (5) general mental health; (6) role activity limitations due to emotional problems; (7) vitality (energy and fatigue) and (8) general health perceptions.34 The items are scored so that higher scores indicate a
greater functional ability.
The higher the score, the
greater the overall
impairment in terms of mental health difficulties and
social functioning.
Moreover, when anxious youth with poor ER are compared to anxious youth who do not have poor ER,
greater impairments in
social functioning and more difficulties with several mood states are apparent (e.g., Kerns et al. 2014).
The only child characteristic found to predict
greater levels of parenting stress was child
social impairment.