Changes to the temperature and pressure of permafrost soils (and ocean waters) could lead to methane, a gas with a much stronger
greenhouse warming potential than carbon dioxide, being released.
Not exact matches
The LCA examined the effects of a 1 kilogram industry - average corrugated product manufactured in 2014 on seven environmental impact indicators: global
warming potential (
greenhouse gas emissions), eutrophication, acidification, smog, ozone depletion, respiratory effects, fossil fuel depletion; and four inventory indicators: water use, water consumption, renewable energy demand, and non-renewable energy demand.
When food waste decomposes in a landfill, it generates methane, a potent
greenhouse gas with 21 times the global
warming potential of carbon dioxide.
The findings suggest that effective new
greenhouse gas controls could help lessen the effects of climate change on the release of carbon from soils of the northern permafrost region and therefore decrease the
potential for a positive feedback of permafrost carbon release on climate
warming.
The research adds one important data point to the ongoing question of how much methane, a
greenhouse gas with a
warming potential 25 times that of carbon dioxide, is emitted in the life cycle of natural gas production, transport and use.
The researchers detected a «significant regional flux» of methane, a
greenhouse gas with about 30 times the
warming potential of carbon dioxide over a 100 - year period, coming from an area of gas wells in southwestern Pennsylvania.
But when unburned methane is released into the atmosphere, it is a potent
greenhouse gas with a
warming potential 28 to 34 times greater than carbon dioxide over a 100 - year timeframe (and up to 84 times more potent over a 20 year timeframe).
Under the worst - case scenario (RCP 8.5), which assumes that
greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise throughout the 21st century, the authors show the
potential for extremely large net increases in temperature - related mortality in the
warmer regions of the world.
That year the U.S. released 7.40 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), a measure of the global
warming potential of any
greenhouse gas in terms of the amount of
warming generated by CO2.
«(2) the carbon dioxide equivalent value for purposes of this Act for any
greenhouse gas not listed in the table under paragraph (1) shall be the 100 - year Global
Warming Potentials provided in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report.
«(C) global atmospheric concentrations of
greenhouse gases, expressed in annual concentration units as well as carbon dioxide equivalents based on 100 - year global
warming potentials;
Even some environmentalists have begun to embrace nuclear power, because of its
potential to reduce the
greenhouse emissions that are blamed for global
warming.
«It only makes up 9 % of total
greenhouse gas emissions, but it's got 300 times more global
warming potential than carbon dioxide», says Prof Richardson.
Meanwhile, here on earth, we still have the same remaining problem of our trapped thermal atmospheric content that can not escape away from Earth's self contained system that is maintained by the
greenhouse gases that surrounds the earth that is said to be increasing in content, and because it increasing in content, the thermal kinetic capacity (global
warming potential of certain said gases will rise with it.)
Many climate scientists, policy experts and environmentalists are concerned about the
potential for the incoming administration to limit funding for climate science and roll back both national and international progress toward limiting the
greenhouse gases that are
warming the planet.
I'm not saying that
greenhouse gases isn't a player, but I'd like the IPCC and the climate community to work towards understanding the other
potential causes of
warming, before jumping to conclusions on the impact of
greenhouse gases.
The EU Regulation on fluorinated
greenhouse gases requires the refrigeration and air conditioning sectors to phase out the use of refrigerant gases with a high global
warming potential by 2030.
The global
warming potential (GWP) depends on both the efficiency of the molecule as a
greenhouse gas and its atmospheric lifetime.
CO 2 equivalents: The GWP value (Global
Warming Potential) of a gas is defined as the cumulative impact on the
greenhouse effect of 1 tonne of the gas compared with that of 1 tonne of CO 2 over a specified period of time.
Discovered in 2007, Gliese 581 is probably too cold to be habitable, although recent studies suggest it could in fact be
warmed by
greenhouse gases, which gives it some
potential to harbor life.
But there are two
greenhouse gases, which are actually much stronger than carbon dioxide: Methane, with a
warming potential 30 times as strong as carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide, -LSB-...]
Indeed, impacts of Arctic
warming include the melting of major Arctic glaciers and Greenland (containing the
potential for up to 7 meters of sea level rise if it were to melt entirely), the thawing of carbon rich permafrost (which could add to the burden of atmospheric
greenhouse gas emissions) and signs of worsening wildfires across the boreal forests of Alaska, to name a few.
This language would have been superfluous and without legal effect if, as Waxman assumes, EPA already had authority since 1970 to regulate carbon dioxide as an «air pollutant» or
greenhouse gases in general based on their» global
warming potential.»
A Japanese study showed that producing a kilogram of beef leads to the emission of
greenhouse gases with a global
warming potential equivalent to 36.4 kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO2).
Methane is a potent
greenhouse gas; according to the EPA, methane has a high global
warming potential of 28 - 36 times that of CO2 over a 100 - year period.
This is the menu of
potential but largely untested ways to counteract global
warming resulting from the buildup of
greenhouse gases, should reality start to reflect worst - case projections.
In 1991, the language was already strong and urgent, noting that the risks were sufficient to justify action even with substantial unanswered questions: «Despite the great uncertainties,
greenhouse warming is a
potential threat sufficient to justify action now.»
And those initial
warming events can trigger even greater
warming because of the «feedback loops» associated with the melting of ice and the
potential release of methane (a very strong
greenhouse gas).»
Another source of short - lifetime bias in the community probably comes from a calculation used to compare the
greenhouse consequences of different gases, called the Global
Warming Potential (GWP)[13].
But that's just it, Paul, within the scientific community anthropogenic causation of increasing
greenhouse gases,
greenhouse gas - induced
warming, and
potential climate effects and impacts of increased
warming are accepted science.
Jain, A.K., et al., Radiative forcings and global
warming potentials of 39
greenhouse gases.
While, in theory, human activities have the
potential to result in net cooling, a concern about 25 years ago, the current balance between
greenhouse gas emissions and the emissions of particulates and particulate - formers is such that essentially all of today's concern is about net
warming.
That was the conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences, which last year reported, «Despite the great uncertainties,
greenhouse warming is a
potential threat sufficient to justify action now.»
«Despite the great uncertainties,
greenhouse warming is a
potential threat sufficient to justify action now.»
There are several areas in which
greenhouse - driven
warming is thought to be a
potential influence.
While persistent and deep uncertainty surrounds the most important
potential impacts from and responses to
greenhouse - driven global
warming (see David Roberts, Michael Levi and this list of reviewed research for more), the long - term picture of a profoundly changed Earth is clear.
The release of this trapped methane is a
potential major outcome of a rise in temperature; it is thought that this is a main factor in the global
warming of 6 °C that happened during the end - Permian extinction as methane is much more powerful as a
greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide (despite its atmospheric lifetime of around 12 years, it has a global
warming potential of 72 over 20 years and 25 over 100 years).
[* GtCO2e is billions of tons of carbon dioxide or the equivalent amount of other
greenhouse gases when measured in terms of their
potential to
warm things up.]
Greenhouse warming poses
potential (somewhat speculative) threats to NADW formation (and thus to Europe's continued
warm climate).
The range of numbers used to determine
greenhouse effectiveness or Global
Warming Potential (GWP) suggested people were just creating numbers — it was not scientific.
The GWP was presented in the First IPCC Assessment (Houghton et al., 1990), stating «It must be stressed that there is no universally accepted methodology for combining all the relevant factors into a single global
warming potential for
greenhouse gas emissions.
All emissions in this figure and chapter refer to GtCO2e (gigatonnes or billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent)-- the global
warming potential - weighted sum of the six Kyoto
greenhouse gases, that is, CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6, including LULUCF CO2 emissions.
They looked at the
potential long - term consequences of oceans ever richer in dissolved carbon dioxide, as humans burn ever more fossil fuels and emit
greenhouse gases that continue to
warm the atmosphere.
The hazard is not in the process itself, but in its
potential acceleration: nobody knows how much carbon is stored in the Arctic tundra as a
greenhouse gas source, and nobody can guess what proportion of this will be released as the world
warms.
Although APS plans to reduce its coal burn from the current 35 % to 17 % by 2029, by increasing its natural gas burn from 19 % to 35 %, it will actually increase its
greenhouse gas emissions in the near term, since the global
warming potential from methane, which is leaked at multiple points of the natural gas supply chain, is 86 times that of carbon over 20 years, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 2013 report.
The case for Arctic methane as a climate emergency relates to the
potential feedback: it is
warming that is triggering the release of methane, itself a potent
greenhouse gas.
Because of methane's greater
greenhouse potency, the
warming potential of the emissions measured during the second period greatly exceeded the
potential cooling produced by the uptake of carbon dioxide during photosynthesis.
While HFCs are not Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and therefore an acceptable substitute for chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) under the Montreal Protocol, they have high global
warming potentials (GWPs) and contribute to
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
An ambitious HFC agreement has the
potential to avoid 100 billion CO2 - equivalent emissions by 2050 and 0.5 °C
warming by 2100, significantly contributing towards the goals of the landmark Paris Agreement last year and eliminating the use of some of the most potent
greenhouse gases in existence.
Used primarily for cooling, these powerful
greenhouse gases can have a global
warming potential of up to 20,000 times more than CO2.