Sentences with phrase «gridcell at»

For Law Dome d18O over 1931 - 1990 for the central gridcell at lag zero i.e. without any Gergian data mining or data torture, using the HadCRUT3v version on archive, I obtained a detrended correlation of 0.529, with a t - statistic of 4.71 3.65 (for 37 degrees of freedom after allowing for autocorrelation using the prescribed technique)[updated Sep 10, 2016].

From there out it is an «iterative» process where the state of the gridcells at one instant is used to predict the state at the next instant.

Not exact matches

If I had my way, people would look at the graphs of the Tiljander data series (here, files downloadable from BitBucket.org) and at the CRUTEM3v gridcell temperature anomaly synthesis for 1850 - 1995 (here).

As a result, the phenomena I describe above, with the rapid changes in circulation regimes, are not represented in the climate models at all except as gridcell sized averages...

But how do «trends» in the AO or NAO relate climatologically to temperature trends at specific gridcell locations?

Let's step back a little on this: if Parker is going to use NCEP gridcell calm - windy as a «proxy» for UHI, then I'd like to see at some examples where it is agreed that there is known UHI and the NCEP gridcell calm - windy distinction picks off the UHI.

Koven then calculated the speed at which a gridcell's climate will shift toward its matching gridcell over the next 80 years.

Jim D, you just looked at three GISS gridcells and 12 BEST gridcells for the same area.

The charts at issue are introduced by «If we calculate trends for all 81 gridcells that have at least one MMTS and one CRS station available, and weight each gridcell by its relative size, we get the following raw mean temperature trends:» and show MMTS stations back in 1965.

If I had my way, people would look at the graphs of the Tiljander data series (here, files downloadable from BitBucket.org) and at the CRUTEM3v gridcell temperature anomaly synthesis for 1850 - 1995 (here).