Sentences with phrase «grounds of age discrimination»

The Complainant, Krystyna Raczynska, launched a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission on the grounds of age discrimination in the course of employment practices.

Not exact matches

Discrimination is forbidden on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, genetic information or any other characteristic protected by law.

The Fox Valley Park District provides programs, activities and facilities without discrimination or segregation on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, or veteran status.

prohibits discrimination in employment or in the provision of training and education on the grounds of any of the following protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

Those issues included closing the «L.L.C. loophole» in campaign finance, amending the SAFE Act, passing GENDA, a law banning discrimination on the grounds of gender identity, and no amendments to raise the age of adult criminal culpability.

EU citizens also enjoy legal protections of the EU law, [7] specifically the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [8] and acts and directives regarding e. g. protection of personal data, rights of victims of crime, preventing and combating trafficking in human beings, equal pay, protection from discrimination in employment on grounds of religion or belief, sexual orientation and age.

Holiday and Sea Bay were both accused of discrimination in 2007 after a single mom struggling to find a place to live complained about a Holiday policy that limited the time that families with a child between the ages of 5 and 17 could stay on the grounds.

I can accept discrimination against myself on almost any grounds be it looks, height, ethnicity or even the color of my shoes, but not when it comes to age.

The Federal Transit Laws, 49 U.S.C. 5332 (b), provide that «no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or age be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any project, program or activity funded in whole or in part through financial assistance under this Act.»

In Ontario, the Human Rights Code protects the «right to equal treatment with respect to employment without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, record of offences, marital status, family status or disability» and also protects against discrimination based on the intersection of multiple of these grounds.

The test to determine discriminatory conduct, in this case direct age discrimination, is set out in reg 3 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)(which is now repealed and set out in s 13 (1) and (2) of the Equality Act 2010): «For the purposes of these Regulations, a person («A») discriminates against another person («B») if, on the grounds of B's age, A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat other persons,... and A can not show the treatment or, as the case may be, provision, criterion or practice to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.&raqage discrimination, is set out in reg 3 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)(which is now repealed and set out in s 13 (1) and (2) of the Equality Act 2010): «For the purposes of these Regulations, a person («A») discriminates against another person («B») if, on the grounds of B's age, A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat other persons,... and A can not show the treatment or, as the case may be, provision, criterion or practice to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.&raqAge) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031)(which is now repealed and set out in s 13 (1) and (2) of the Equality Act 2010): «For the purposes of these Regulations, a person («A») discriminates against another person («B») if, on the grounds of B's age, A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat other persons,... and A can not show the treatment or, as the case may be, provision, criterion or practice to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.&raqage, A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat other persons,... and A can not show the treatment or, as the case may be, provision, criterion or practice to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.»

By contrast, in Kücükdeveci a subjective right for individuals could already be derived from Article 21 (1) of the Charter which contained a prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age (para 47).

Thompsons NI has a long history of representing workers who have been discriminated against on the grounds of religion or political opinion, as well as disability, gender, race, age and sexual orientation discrimination claims.

Discrimination: Irrespective of length of service, an employee may bring a claim for discriminatory dismissal or discrimination based on any one of the nine discriminatory grounds contrary to equality legislation (i.e., gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, race (including colour, nationality and ethnic or national origin) and membership of the travellDiscrimination: Irrespective of length of service, an employee may bring a claim for discriminatory dismissal or discrimination based on any one of the nine discriminatory grounds contrary to equality legislation (i.e., gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, race (including colour, nationality and ethnic or national origin) and membership of the travelldiscrimination based on any one of the nine discriminatory grounds contrary to equality legislation (i.e., gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, race (including colour, nationality and ethnic or national origin) and membership of the traveller community).

Jan Mazák and Martin Moser assess the CJEU's legitimacy on the basis of its use of general principles of law, especially that of the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age in controversial cases such as Mangold and Kücükdeveci.

McCormick complained, not unreasonably, that this violated the Code, which prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of, among other grounds, age.

The Code prohibits discrimination by a «person» against another «person» (the «complainant») on the basis of various prohibited grounds, such as race, sex and age in various social contexts, such as provision of services, housing and employment.

For the GCC, Mangold was problematic, both because there was a substantive disagreement regarding the nature of discrimination on grounds of age and, crucially, because the ruling was constitutionally unprincipled.

The claimant's submissions were directed, first, to reg 3, which permitted employers to justify direct discrimination on the ground of age; second, to reg 30 that provided that it did not constitute unlawful discrimination for an employer to dismiss an employee on the grounds of retirement at age 65.

Irish and EU law prohibit workplace discrimination on grounds of age.

Other grounds of discrimination include race, colour, sexual orientation, age, sex, and others.

In Ireland, the Employment Equality Acts 1998 — 2015 prohibit discrimination on grounds of age, but specifically permit the use of mandatory retirement ages provided that they are «objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim, and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary.»

Under the Equality Act 2010, discrimination on grounds of age is unlawful unless it can be objectively justified as a proportionate means of...

Under the Equality Act 2010, discrimination on grounds of age is unlawful unless it can be objectively justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

In Ontario, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are: citizenship, race, place of origin, ethnic origin, colour, ancestry, disability, age, creed, sex / pregnancy, family status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, receipt of public assistance (in housing) and record of offences (in employment).

Discrimination (including on grounds of age, race, sex, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, marital status, religion or belief, and disability) and equal treatment

Though they vary across provinces and territories, grounds of discrimination can include race, age, sex, ethnic origin, family status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or having a criminal record.

Some of the prohibited grounds for discrimination under the Code include family status, creed, citizenship, ethnic origin, colour, race, sex, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status.

Provincial and federal human rights statutes protect people from discrimination on the basis of several grounds such as age, race, language and disability.

22 The right under sections 1 and 3 to equal treatment with respect to services and to contract on equal terms, without discrimination because of age, sex, marital status, family status or disability, is not infringed where a contract of automobile, life, accident or sickness or disability insurance or a contract of group insurance between an insurer and an association or person other than an employer, or a life annuity, differentiates or makes a distinction, exclusion or preference on reasonable and bona fide grounds because of age, sex, marital status, family status or disability.

The Canadian Human Rights Act defines the following prohibited grounds of discrimination: race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.

In employment matters, including the hiring process, discrimination and harassment is prohibited in the Ontario Human Rights Code on the grounds of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed (religion), sex, sexual orientation, handicap (disability and perceived disability), age, marital status, same - sex partnership status, family status, record of offences, gender identity and gender expression.

For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for which a pardon has been granted.

Article 6 of the Directive allows member states to provide that «differences of treatment on grounds of age shall not constitute discrimination, if, within the context of national law, they are objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim, including legitimate employment policy, labour market and vocational training objectives, and if the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary».

Equality and diversity officers aim to reduce workplace discrimination on the grounds of age, disability, gender, race, religion and sexual orientation.

We wholeheartedly support the principle of equal opportunities and oppose all forms of unlawful and unfair discrimination on the grounds of colour, race, nationality, culture, religion or belief, age, ethnic or national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, marital / civil partnership status, pregnancy or maternity, disability, or socio - economic group.

The Australian Human Rights Commission is an independent organisation that investigates and resolves complaints about discrimination, harassment and bullying on the basis of race, sex, disability, age, religion, sexual preference, criminal record, trade union activity and other grounds.